Preview

Thomas Hobbes View Of The State Of Nature

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Hobbes View Of The State Of Nature
Political Philosophy
1. How does Hobbes view the state of nature? Hobbes credits to each person in the state of nature a liberty right to preserve herself, which he terms “the right of nature”. This is the right to do whatsoever one sincerely judges requiring for one's protection; yet because it is at least possible that virtually anything might be judged necessary for one's protection, this hypothetically limited right of nature becomes in practice an unlimited right to potentially anything, or, as Hobbes puts it, a right “to all things”. Hobbes further assumes that people should accept what they see to be the necessary means to their most important ends.
2. How does Rousseau view the state of nature?

Jean-Jacques Rousseau states
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Rationality In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan
    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rationality In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

    but such a system would have to take for granted Hobbes’ values and rationality—it would not work ‘right out of the box’ as deontology or utilitarianism does; more on this later.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis
    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau's Relationship With Nature
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thoreau's Relationship With Nature

    Emerson helped Thoreau in many ways, he found Thoreau work when needed and encouraged him greatly in his writing. Perhaps one of the most beneficial things Emerson ever did for Thoreau was loan him some land on the outskirts of Concord where he would build a hut on the shoreline of Walden Pond, a famous location in his writing. Here Thoreau would spend countless hours tramping through the woods and fishing all the while observing nature around him. Nature is seen as a beneficial force in the works of Henry David Thoreau. If one understands, studies and reflects on nature, then lessons about the meaning of being human are sure to follow. Through intimate relationships with nature, Thoreau constructs his own identification and philosophy.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final
    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Phil 103 Final

    1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes State Of Nature Essay
    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

    It is a brutish and violent nature. In the absence of culture, arts, science, reading or writing, humans, possibly, are more related to animals, since animals also live in the state of nature, and who always fight for domination. This rather negative view is Hobbe’s main reason why there should be a government. There should be an authority to establish peace. In peace, numerous achievements can be obtained. In peace does humanity progress. It might be argued that Hobbes demands a despot, an autocracy. Still, is not that better than the state of nature? There might be many opposing arguments especially that of the anarchists, yet Hobbe’s examples might not be conquered because they are succinct and feasible. They are plausibly impregnable because they are factual, not idealist. Leviathan does convincingly argue, and this monster in the state of nature does devour…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary Of Emma Goldman's Anarchism
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary Of Emma Goldman's Anarchism

    First, Hobbes imagines the state of nature as what would result if humans were free from laws and societal expectations, a conception which has latent problems. Conceiving of the state of nature in this way predisposes Hobbes to imagine simply taking already-socialized human beings and freeing them of the constraints of civil society and the force of authority. In Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau argues that Hobbes, and other political theorists, have not removed the effects of society from their conceptions of natural man. Rousseau writes that his objective involves “separating what he [man] derives from his own wherewithal from what circumstances and his progress have added to or changed in his primitive state”…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes Vs Mill
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Mill

    Hobbes offers support to his claim that nature makes men apt to fight one another, by showing how people act in their own self-interest. When people act in their own self-interest they look to preserve their own life. Hobbes believes in his definition of nature that man must use their own virtues of protection to ultimately preserve themselves. The way Hobbes describes the motivation is quite simple. For instance, in modern society, one may still lock our homes regardless if it is a perfectly safe area – this is due to Hobbes’ concept of, “self-preservation.” Nevertheless, the root of these actions is actually…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Henry David Thoreau: Are We Pulling Away From Nature?
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau: Are We Pulling Away From Nature?

    Over just a few decades, computers have gone from taking up entire rooms to a person being able to carry one around in their pocket. Technology has grown to extraordinary levels. With all of these technology advancements comes consequences. Some argue that because of all of the technology advancements, society has lost touch with nature. There are people that believe that humanity has built such a complete shelter around themselves that nature is no longer a part of the human life as it once was. Henry David Thoreau, a philosopher and self-trained naturalist, was one of the people that believed the world is losing touch with nature. He believed that people aren 't living the way they are supposed to. He is known for being the author of Walking and Walden. John Lame Deer was another person who believed that society is living in a post nature world. He does not like the way society is effecting the world. Lame Deer would rather enjoy a beautiful view of pure nature than a bunch of buildings and fences. On another note, John Berlau has a completely different view on the world. Berlau believes that humans are just doing what they are meant to do and the way they effect nature is just a necessary part of it.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role of Fear in Hobbes' Leviathan
    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role of Fear in Hobbes' Leviathan

    Throughout Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, there are numerous references to the emotion of fear in human nature and it’s effects as one of the defining principles of human interaction. It helps set up a foundation of sorts for some of the main points of Hobbes’ liberal view on the governing body of society and a basis for the “Social Contract Theory”.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau's Influence On Nature
    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau's Influence On Nature

    It is practically impossible to finish a history class without the mention of Henry David Thoreau. “Civil Disobedience” became one of the most important pieces of literature during the 20th century. This concept was utilized by some of the most influential people of the time like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. (Frederick). While his political impact might arguably be the light in which he is most often discussed, in the field of biological conservation he is a giant as well. The natural world has come to the forefront in many societies around the world. It has expanded beyond science and affects the political and economic realms along with many others. Henry David Thoreau can offer an interesting and important take on what nature is in respect to humans and these subjects. He…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    Two of the most influential political philosopher and social contract theorists of all time, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both used ‘The State of Nature’ as a medium in order to understand the basic human nature and natural human rights in their writings. Both, then used their own understanding of the human nature in order to determine and justify the ideal form of government, its role and its powers. However, Locke and Hobbes reach markedly different conclusions. Hobbes argues that every man should concede all of his natural rights to the government and allow it to assume absolute power, while Locke argues that man is entitled to keep his natural rights and a government body is required only in order to protect those certain natural rights.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes State Of Nature Analysis
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes State Of Nature Analysis

    Hobbes description of the state of nature is supposed to show that society can have a life without government, rules, or a ruler. That everyone in a society is roughly equal and no matter how strong a person may be, they can be killed by another person or a group of people (Rader, n.d.). During his time, kings and other ruling classes were above the rest of society. This got Hobbes thinking of what really justifies the existence of the king or government? He started out by imagening a world without a government or king ruling. This thinking got Hobbes in a place where everyone could have the right to everything; a full liberty for every…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics