Preview

Courtroom Workgroup Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1097 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Workgroup Essay Example
Criminal Justice 210

Courtroom Workgroup

A Courtroom Workgroup in the United States criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal defense attorney, criminal prosecutor, and the judicial officer. Participants within the criminal trial are divided in two courtroom workgroups consisting of professionals and outsiders. Professionals are the courtrooms official actors; these individuals conduct court business and are well versed in the practice of criminal trials. Defense attorneys, public defenders, prosecuting attorneys, judges, and others who earn a living serving the court fall into this category.
Outsiders consist of the individuals only temporarily involved with courts. Outsiders are non-personnel. These individuals consist of defendants, jurors, victims, and witnesses. Outsiders generally are unfamiliar with trial procedures or courtroom organization. It has been indicated aside from ethical consideration, and statutory requirements courtroom interaction of the professionals involves recognition of cooperation, shared goals, and informal rules of civility.
Dedicated to bringing the procedure to a successful close within the adversarial framework of a criminal trial is the goal of the courtroom workgroup. This means that the defense attorney, judicial officer, and the prosecutor hold meetings and assume the defendant is guilty; they negotiate a plea bargain with a sentence attached without a trial thereby saving time and expediting the court processes.
How does the courtroom workgroup interact daily? Pandemic is planned ahead by the court. Each court puts into place a set of tailored templates in anticipation of procedures that may be needed and information that should be followed if a pandemic or any emergency should occur that would require most or all employees and judges possibly for an extended period to work from home so that operations would be able to continue if he or she was required to. The workgroup

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Nadel Law Case Essay Example

    • 5133 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Edward J. Felson and Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, for appellants. Jonathan P. Saxton, Cincinnati, for appellee Burger King Corporation. Droder & Miller Co., L.P.A., A. Dennis Miller and Kevin J. Ryan, Cincinnati, for appellee Emil, Inc.…

    • 5133 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ftc Vs Wild Oats Essay

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    FTI graphics experts can create a wide range of visual communications devices to support the litigation team, including: — Exhibit plans and outlines — Opening statement presentations — Witness presentations — Research presentations — Hardboards — 2D and 3D animation — Interactive multimedia — Timelines — Technical and medical illustrations — Tutorials FTI Trial Technology professionals lend expertise in the courtroom and war room with: — Best-of-breed courtroom presentation solutions — Deepest bench of experienced trial technology consultants in the industry — TrialMax trial presentation software FTI Jury consultants offer deep experience designing research…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper going to be coving the materials we went over in the You make the Call: Discretion in Criminal Justice Courtroom Workgroup simulation. You are the new assistance prosecutor for the DA Office. You are faced with problem solving and what action are taking to the choices you make in your new position as the assistance prosecutor. In this paper it will describe the problem you faced in the simulation. Also this paper will explain the approaches used for resolving the problem. Last it will discuss how critical or creative thinking skills were used or not used in the simulation.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the textbook the courtroom work group is the professional courtroom actors, including judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorney, public defenders and others who earn a living serving the court. The jobs of the courtroom work group vary from person to person. The courtroom work group interacts in many ways on a daily basis. All of the different professionals have their specific jobs to do.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The re-engineered FCIC network has become today 's CJ Net. It differs from the FCIC network in two fundamental ways. First, agencies connected through the CJ net operate in a peer-to-peer relationship. Every agency "sees" every other agency on the network and has the capability to access information that agencies wish to share with each other. There is no "master" or host computer controlling communications between agencies. Each agency determines the types of information they wish to share. Second, a broader range of criminal justice agencies is being brought into the network. The CJ Net project is focused on connecting Clerks of the Court and state and local courts throughout the State. Other criminal justice agencies will be added as funding allows. (FDLE-CJ Net, 1998)…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In most courtrooms, there are groups of essential players that work together on a regular basis. They are composed of a combination of professionals. These professional are the ones which understand all phases of a criminal trial, and they all work together in fulfilling the functions of the court.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the courtroom there is a group of key players that work together on a daily basis. They are made of a group of professionals. These professional are those who know all aspects of a criminal trial and they work together in performing the duties of the court.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you're looking for a way to kill the basketball league, you should call a man named Perry Johnson of Chicago, Illinois. I think he’s found it.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicially supervised, community-based treatment plans for each defendant participating in the court, which a team of court staff and mental health…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Within the walls of any courtroom exemplified is the adversarial system of the United States of America between prosecutors and attorneys. In a logical sense, both roles and responsibilities are somewhat similar but contrasting.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The courtroom work group is composed of various people who make the court systems work to the best of their ability. Each person has its position, and she/he is responsible for their part. We can start from the top, first we have a Judge, he/she is responsible for imposing the proper judging techniques in the courtroom, and they are to make sure the accused rights are not violated in the courtroom. Then we have a defense attorney, and the defense attorney is to defend his client against any wrongdoing by the court and prove his client is innocent of the charges being brought to him/her.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe there are differences between the adult justice system and the juvenile justice system because of the differences in age, experiences, knowledge, and maturity. The juvenile justice system focuses on the rehabilitation of the juvenile, whereas the adult justice system’s goal is to punish and obtain retribution for the crime(s) committed. Juvenile offenders are given sentences that seek to rehabilitate rather than punish. Some of the treatment options offered could include counseling and placement in juvenile institutions that were also created to help restore them. Adult offenders are given harsh sentences. The sentences given can include a…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 angry men themes paper

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A very important quality in a group is cooperation. If you have people who do not cooperate, you ca not get anything done. When the jurors wanted to get done with this trial, they were fighting. So they would not work together and let each other speak. Maybe if they could communicate, they might have gotten done quicker.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I entered the court room, the defendant’s girlfriend was on the witness stand. She was the first individual on record that received a call from the defendant after the murder. She described the defendant’s condition as “distraught”, “all over the place” and “frantic” during the phone call. She exclaimed that the first words that came out of the defendant’s mouth were “I just shot him and I’m scared!” She tried to defend the father of her children by claiming he was in a disoriented mental state and was scared for his life. Even though he admitted to committing the crime to her, she did not report to the authorities with information. The district attorney brought up her while questioning her, since it was the vehicle driven…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays