Preview

Did the Provisional Government face an impossible task in Russia in 1917

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
555 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did the Provisional Government face an impossible task in Russia in 1917
Plan for Question: To what extent is it true to say that the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?

Threat of Political Opposition
- Soviets had more power than any other ‘body’; this was because they were looked upon as the legitimate authority in the land.
- They shared a dual authority with the Soviets. The All-Russia Soviet claimed the right to issue laws. From Feb to Oct 1917, major areas of policy to be agreed upon by both. The Petrograd Soviet was the closest and also the strongest force threatening the authority of the PG as the 2 groups met in different ends of the same building, the Tauride Palace.
- The Prov. Gov. was not a democratic Gov. some thought it was just a copy of the Tsarist Romanov Dynasty autocratic rule. Also, it was seen as illegitimate as no-one had elected them to lead the now-free country of Russia. There were controversy over the legitimacy of the Prov. Gov.
- Some of the country’s most influential exiles returned to Russia; e.g. Lenin.

Ways the Prov. Gov. Strengthened and improved Russia
- There were numerous reforms; including freedoms of assembly, press and speech; the abolition of legal restrictions regarding race, class and religion; universal suffrage (right to vote) introduced; more democracy; the abolition of capital punishment.

The return of Lenin
- On Lenin’s arrival into Petrograd’s Finland Station on April 3rd 1917; he makes a speech condemning the Prov. Gov. claiming that the revolution of February 1917 (that led to Tsar Nicholas II’s abdication) did not give the Russian citizens political freedom, but rather had created a parliamentary system ruled by UC and MC bourgeoisie.
- In his April Thesis, he rejected the dual authority split between the PG and the Soviets. Stating that the revolution had led to authority being taken by ex-tsarist aristocrats and businessmen.
- Lenin caused chaos amongst the Bolsheviks with his return to Russia, as he tried to convince them that the Pro. Gov. needed to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?

    Firstly, the repressive policies of the Tsar was partly responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule as the Tsar made it very difficult for there to be any sort of opposition. This was because the Tsar implemented the Okraha (secret police) to exile anyone who opposed him. This created fear in opposition groups so they started operated from outside Russia. In addition to this, the Statute of State Security meant that the government opponents were tried so could not operate. This, with the help of Okhrana barred any opposition.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964
    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Were Divisions Amongst Opponents Responsible for the Survival of Tsarist Rule, 1881 - 1905?
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Were Divisions Amongst Opponents Responsible for the Survival of Tsarist Rule, 1881 - 1905?

    Firstly, the opposition groups of the Tsar were known as the Populists, the Liberals and the Marxists. Each group had its own ideas on what was needed for Russia and each group wanted change, however, there were many problems within the groups and none of them were willing to work with each other. The Populists who were mainly concentrated on establishing a democratic government used violent tactics such as terrorism and assassinations, the most famous being the assassination of Tsar Alexander II. However, the Liberals, who also wanted to establish some sort of democracy did not agree on using violent tactics, they preferred to discuss things in meetings and banqueting campaigns. The Liberals were the most moderate of the opposition groups and wanted to keep the Tsar, but remove autocracy and have his current power shared between a democratic government. The Marxists, like the other two groups, also wanted to establish some sort of democracy; however, once again, they did not agree on using violence, they preferred to use propaganda campaigns, as did the Populists and Liberals, but not violence. These divisions meant that each opposition group’s strength alone was not enough to achieve their own specific goals and even though the groups did have some tactics such as propaganda in common, it was not enough. If each group had considered changing their tactics or been slightly more lenient, they may have succeeded.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964
    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881–1905?
    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881–1905?

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Khrushchev Fell From Power Because He Failed To Convince The Party Of The Need To Carry Out Fundamental Reform In The USSR
    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Khrushchev Fell From Power Because He Failed To Convince The Party Of The Need To Carry Out Fundamental Reform In The USSR

    ‘Khrushchev fell from power because he failed to convince the party of the need to carry out fundamental reform in the USSR’…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917
    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy
    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Soviet Union a Command Economy?
    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Was Soviet Union a Command Economy?

    Bibliography: 1. Adams, J.S. 1967. ‘People’s Control’ in the Soviet Union. Michigan State University Press…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why did the Bolsheviks gain power in Russia in 1917?
    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why did the Bolsheviks gain power in Russia in 1917?

    In March, 1917, Tsar Nicholas resigned from the throne. New laws were passed by the new government called the ‘Provisional Government’, many Russians faced by poverty were expecting changes, but the laws did not pass their expectations. This government did not last long. Lenin, leader of the Bolsheviks travelled to Russia and was dissatisfied with the new government and made a bid for power. In October, the Bolsheviks led another revolution, which remove the Provisional Government from power. With Lenin, now the ruler of Russia, he went about completely altering Russia into a Communist society.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Russian Revolution Causes

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Discontent In Pre-Revolutionary Russia
    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Discontent In Pre-Revolutionary Russia

    The accuracy of this statement is absolute. It is apparent that the majority of citizens residing in Pre-Revolutionary Russia were not satisfied with the way in which their Autocratic government ran the country. There were numerous factors which contributed to the citizens discontent with the nation. Living conditions were poor, working conditions were even worse, being the first western nation to loose to Asia, the failure to promote freedom within the Duma as well as the Tsar’s complete and utter ignorance to the people were all causes of this unrest.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty
    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Romanov Dynasty

    When discussing why public opinion of the tsar was so easily pliable in the lead up to revolution in 1917, we must acknowledge that Russia was evolving rapidly. As modern historians and public spectators, it is simple to map out how Russian society became a pressure cooker of discontent and anger. Mass industrialisation made living for a working, urban class almost unbearable, the class divide was still rigid, revolutionary ideas from the West offered a foundation to base claims for the removal of the autocratic system, and the pressures of World War 1 served to unite the people in one cause to end hardship. These factors stoked a population already vying for change and such an environment made revolution in Petrograd (St Petersburg) in the February of 1917 almost inevitable, foreshadowing the end of the…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Civil Disobedience
    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Civil Disobedience

    Since the founding of the United States, the founding fathers feared a government that would become too authoritarian. To contrast this, they allowed the right to protest in the First Amendment. However, protesting usually does not do enough. Often, civil disobedience is necessary to provoke conversation about sometimes immoral societal norms. Many examples include Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Rosa Parks, and others.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics