Preview

Doctrine of Privity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Doctrine of Privity
Doctrine of Privity
What is doctrine of privity?
Third parties do not have any rights in a contract due to doctrine of privity. Only parties contracted to each other can enforce an agreement
Dunlop v Selfridge
“Only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it.. Our law knows nothing of a jus quaesitum tertio (rights on account of third parties) arising by way of contract “ as per Viscount Haldane
Dunlop sued Selfridge and stated that Selfridge was bound by their term that they have made with Dew&Co.
Can Dunlop enforce the term agreed with Dew against Selfridge?
HOL stated no. Due to doctrine of privity, a third party cannot enforce a term or a third party cannot enforce sue on a term. Law of contracts do not recognize the rights of third parties.
Tweedle v Atkinson
A contract cannot impose liabilities on anyone except a party to it
A contract cannot confer rights on anyone except a party to it
“In general, no action can be maintained upon a promise unless the consideration moves from the party to whom it is made”
Beswick v BeswickWhat is the relationship between consideration and privity?
Consideration gives the right to enforce an agreement regardless privity.
In the absence of consideration, privity is required to have a right to sue.
Justifications: What is the purpose of doctrine of privity?
Contract law concerns bargain between parties (Eg: Dunlop & Dew). Therefore, it is unfair to impose any terms on a third party to enforce a term that she or he was not privy to.
Parties should only be obliged to fulfill terms stated in the contract and not to anyone else.
Based on the above, Lord Haldane in Dunlop’s case stated, only a person who is party to a contract can sue on it because our law knows nothing of third party’s rights or liabilities.
Should the doctrine of privity be retained/removed/abolished/modified?
Law Commission Report Opposition to the Law Commission Report
The main principle of privity; that 2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. A promise to pay in exchange for a promise of performance becomes an absolute duty when the agreement is formed -F…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 4758 Words
    • 20 Pages

    National Steel, Inc., and Overland Transport Company enter into a contract. Superior Oil Corporation, which will indirectly benefit from the deal, is prevented from having rights under the contract by the principle of…

    • 4758 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holding: a wavier of any legal right at the request of another party is sufficient consideration for a promise.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Frigaliment sued B.N.S. There were two contracts that involved selling chickens. In the first contract B.N.S was in agreeance with selling 75,000 pounds of 2.5-3 pounds of chicken, to Frigaliment. 50,000 pounds of chicken at 2.5-3 pounds at a higher price were agreed in the second contract. B.N.S fulfilled the first contract with two shipments. The first shipment fell short. B.N.S made up for the short shipment in their second shipment. Frigaliment accused B.N.S of shipping the larger chicken not to their expectations. Frigaliment protested the rest of the shipments. B.N.S said that their only obligations was to ship chicken that met the requirements stated in the contract.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kolchek Negligence Case

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When product liability is based on a negligence act then then there is no privity of the contract required.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are some similarities when it comes to UCC and Common Law contracts. But UCC is for goods and tangible items whereas Common Law Contract is for the intangible items like services. UCC is use to eliminate the technical requirements of contract law. UCC relies on the merchants acting on good faith and reasonable contracts. Part of the UCC is in most contracts between merchants. Common Law contracts are normally made between two individual parties.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    for the contract to be valid and not have any future issues or breaches of contract. Contracts must…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A nonbreaching party is only entitled to damages within the contemplation of the parties at the time of contracting. Damages which may be recovered by a party for breach of contract are restricted to those damages which were reasonably foreseen or…

    • 25666 Words
    • 103 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business and Consumer Law

    • 17559 Words
    • 60 Pages

    Doesn’t have to be in writing: Contracts can also come in a verbal form – but tend to be more difficult to prove in court…

    • 17559 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    This project bears on imprint of many peoples. I sincerely thank to Sir Puranjoy Ghosh and Ma 'am Jinia Kundu, faculty members of KIIT School of Law, KIIT University for providing me an opportunity to do my project work on “ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACTS AND BENEFITS OF THIRD PARTY”. Also, I wish to avail myself of this opportunity, express a sense of gratitude and love to my friends and my beloved parents for their manual support, strength, help and for everything .…

    • 2704 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unsw Legt1707 Assignment 1

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Under contract law, both parties must have had the intention to be legally bound by the contracts terms and conditions. It is often difficult to test the parties intention since it’s objective and often a question of interpretation of the words used in the construction of the agreement . To help determine whether intention exists, the courts will either presume the…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: 1. Radcliffe, Mark F. and Brinson, Diane (1999) DLA Piper US LLP Contracts Law FindLaw http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Jan/1/241463.html…

    • 2642 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a one sided contract, one party known as the offeror, makes a promise in exchange for an act by another party known as the offeree. If the offeree acts on the offeror’s promise, the offeror is legally obligated to fulfil the contract. After an offeree has performed, only one enforceable promise exists, that of the…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Expungement

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These contracts emerged from necessity. For example, lets say we’re in ancient cave man times, living in constant fear of predators and other cave men. You and I understand there is strength in numbers. We agree to watch each other’s back, by taking turns keeping watch so the other can sleep. The agreement has to include a clause where we both take responsibility for not killing the other. That's our contract. Anyone else around us, if they aren’t party to our contract, will try to kill us, because they want our stuff (our wheels or our clubs), because they're not part on our agreement, because we would do the same to them. Eventually, all the cave men realize it is in their best interest to also join our agreement, because if they don’t always have to worry about being robbing or killed, they’ll have more time to hunt wooly mammoths and draw on cave walls…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lcw1 Vocabulary

    • 7441 Words
    • 30 Pages

    (1) Consent- parties may not trick each other or use force. (2) Written Contract- some must be written.…

    • 7441 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics