Burke felt that the age of selfless devotion to the monarchy and the chivalric code by which the people lived had given way to a new way of living - a meaningless economic consciousness in which actions were motivated by selfish needs only. He felt that once we reject moral imagination, there is nothing to keep us from returning to our primal selves, governed by animalistic instincts. Burke brings in the metaphor of ‘decent drapery of life’ as being ‘necessary to cover the defects of our naked, shivering nature’ - this introducing the subtle idea that a revolution in France could be compared to an act of rape (Burke 4).
If we considered his implications objectively, we could understand his metaphor of dress and undress - that the aristocratic and chivalric ways of life served as a wardrobe, to envelope and camouflage our deepest, darkest and most brutish natures. According to this theory, Burke’s choice of a metaphor of rape may have been appropriate - but mostly when the aspect of ‘clothing’ is considered. If we take into regard every other consequence and everything else that comes along