Preview

Epicurus' Philosophy on a Good Life Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epicurus' Philosophy on a Good Life Essay Example
Epicurus was a Greek philosopher. He was born, in the year 341 BCE, on the island of Samos, which is located a mile off of the western coast of Turkey. In 306 he moved to Athens for the required two years of military training that every Athenian did. When he finished the training he stayed in Athens absorbing the philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. He eventually returned to his home in Samos where he started his own school, The Garden. The reason the school was called The Garden is because its location was, believe it or not, his own garden. It is there where he taught philosophy to his disciples who were known as “the philosophers of the garden.” But unlike Plato’s Academy and the Lyceum of Aristotle, “The Garden” allowed women to join and philosophize, which was unheard of at that time. One of the biggest things Epicurus tried to achieve was tranquility. His definition of pleasure was that was “freedom from pain and fear.” Epicurus valued the mind more so than the body. He said that we should enjoy intellectual pleasure more than sensual pleasure because the intellectual would last much longer and cause less suffering. Epicurus is not saying that having sex or other physical pleasures is bad or evil, because the sensations felt during the act is always good. He is saying that when you have too much of it or pursue it too often, it ends up bringing pain and lasts only a short while. It is in this sense that Epicurus is a hedonist. A hedonist is one who believes that pleasure is the greatest good for people. This developed Epicureanism, a hedonistic philosophy that stressed science, serenity, and friendship as the keys to pleasure, happiness, and the good life. Some of the greatest producers of pain and fear are religion and death. Epicurus believed that if we conquered the fear of death, the afterlife, and the gods we would be able to reach genuine happiness. One of the major differences between Epicurus and other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Which Hellenistic philosophy taught that we should strive for “pleasure,” defined as the absence of pain? –Epicureanism…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epicurus seems to believe that the idea that ataraxia/ happiness can be achieved if one is able to lessen pain as much as possible, on the other hand, Epictetus believes that ataraxia/happiness can only be reached by having a strong mind and if one is indifferent to external events that are beyond one's control. Epictetus's ethical theory seems to be a little influenced by his belief in god and more about his stoicism, while Epicurus, though he does not deny the existence of God, his theory is less influenced by divinity. Epicurus’s theory maintains that people should try to minimize one’s own desires and pains. Also, for someone to reach the highest form of pleasure, it is important to have a positive attitude toward the future and death.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epikouros, also called Epicurus, was a Greek philosopher known greatly for the school he founded, Kepos, also known as “The Garden.” In his honor, Epikouros had a statue erected at Kepos depicting him sitting calmly in a chair, even referencing to the entire philosophy he founded, Epicureanism. His philosophy is based upon his teachings that a positive outlook can overcome fear, pain, stress, and lead to happiness, alluding to the calm demeanor Epikouros is depicted with in his original statue that was likely originally displayed in Kepos (Katona, “Epicurus”). The marble head of Epikouros is actually just a copy of this original statue as there have been many others made as well, though they still depict Epikouros very…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bwvw Study Guide

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hedonism- Defines pleasure and pain according to human condition. (social condition) Ex. Pursuit of pleasure, comfort, safety and security in human terms. All struggle and pain is defined as evil. Delayed gratification is…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suffering and Epicurus

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epicurus was a hedonist, a materialist and a consequentialist who strongly believed that in order to attain the good life one must live a pleasant existence free of worry and pain. Through reflection of the concepts in Epicurus’s Letter to Menoeceus this paper will discuss Epicurus’s argument of why ‘death means nothing to us’ (Epicurus 1998a, p.49). In other words, the concept that one should not fear death, which he held to be a state of fear bringing only pain to one’s life. In addition, the notion of applying these concepts for ethical purposes on how one should live their life will be explained. In conclusion, this paper will provide a compelling argument of the reasons why Epicurus’s ideas on being fearless of death did indeed contribute to the alleviation of pain and helped with the pursuit of happiness or ataraxia (peace of mind).…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One interesting thing about Epicurus’ is that he believed that the true life of pleasure consists…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus says that Pleasure is what we pursue and, what we come back to, but for him pleasure stems from lack of pain. He believed that a life on moderation brought the most pleasure that over indulgence was unhealthy and brought pain. The simple things in life bring the most pleasure. He believed that mental pain was worse the physical pain. He explained mental pain a disturbance of the mind. He urged prudence in our pursuit of pleasures, and that all other virtues spring from it.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument is also sound. I have already proven its validity, now I must show that the conclusion is actually true. If Aristotle is going to claim that one cannot reach a state of happiness without being engaged in virtuous action, then it does logically follow that this type of unfailing virtue that Aristotle so vividly describes cannot possibly be reached without contemplative action. Some opposing views of Aristotle say that a life totally based off acts of contemplation is not realistic in our world. But Aristotle is careful to note, in response to this issue, that of course, living a life fully dedicated towards contemplation is too high of a life for humans (Bk. X, Ch. 7). Rather, contemplation is a divine, internal presence within a person. When situations arise that do not…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rosenbaum states “Epicurus offered a remedy for our attitudes towards our death” (Rosenbaum 175). People spend minutes, hours sometimes days preoccupied with the thought of death. Conjuring death in their mind is worse than actually experiencing it. Indeed, if something has no impact on a person, then there is no need of thinking about it. Once in a while it’s fine to think about death but it should take control of our lives. Instead one should try as much as possible to maximize pleasures and minimize pain. Evidently when one does so then the attitude towards death is no longer about fear but about how to escape the mere fact of…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare is a play about honor, integrity, and political strife. Each character is faced with difficult decisions influenced either by ambition or honor. Marcus Brutus, one of the main characters of the play, although one of Caesar's best friends, is the head conspirator plotting for Caesar's death. Marcus Brutus is motivated by honor…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear Of Death Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus also believed that death was not to be feared. The two writers list four reasons. People do not know what it's like to be dead. Nobody knows the feeling of death; therefore there is no need to fear of death. And we cannot say death is bad. In addition, the writer talks about the relationship between mortal and immortal. It will be boring if a person is mortal and never die. This is called the deprivation of death. If people do not want to live immortal, it is not necessary to fear of death. The third reason is people are worried about dying in a young age. Another possible answer is people are fear of dying in the near future. However, now science and technology are developed. Almost everyone lives healthy nowadays. If a person is health, then he or she does not need to be fear of death. Kagan and Epicurus, explore the thought-provoking part of death. Life after death could be a myth meaning the only important part of human life is when someone is alive. It is then clear of his existence. Could gauge him on his identity and see the effect of his living. As everyone waits for his death, as everyone also experiences the death of other people they become aware of the importance of existence. One’s existence is same as one’s death. The version of understanding both beliefs and values of a person, range from the mentality pursued within the articulation of the same…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPICURUS TO MENOECEUS

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus in his letter to Menoeceus backers the necessity of freedom from prejudice, superstition and extremes of emotions in the pursuit of happiness and a tranquil life. The apparent simplicity of this formula allowed detractors to misinterpret Epicurus, depicting him as depraved, hedonistic, anarchistic and atheistic. His aim is to present to us, how to live a happy life. He sees happiness as the fundamental principle of the good life. This paper is an attempt to critically delineate the essential tenets of Epicureanism as articulated in his letter to Menoeceus, and finally to criticize and evaluate in order to arrive at a dependable conclusion. In what follows, it would be apt to briefly consider the personality or Epicurus, before delving into the main work.…

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Greek Life Essay Example

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the Kappa Alpha Society was founded in 1825 at Union College, all but three United States Presidents have been members of a fraternity. The Greek system now contains nine million members across 123 chapters of fraternities and sororities. Nine million people have taken advantage of the opportunity to better themselves and their universities through a fraternity or sorority. However whenever a Greek organization is featured in the media, it is usually for reasons of an out of control party or hazing allegations. The media ignores the millions of hours dedicated to community service, as well as the millions of dollars raised for charity annually. Hazing makes headlines, philanthropy does not. The Greek system is frequently criticized for instances of members breaking the non-hazing policy of every chapter across the country, and is regularly condemned for it.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Epictetus’ Enchiridion, Epictetus claims that people are upset not by the things themselves but by their judgements about the things. This is because people are not in control of what happens to them, but they are in control of their own response. Therefore, the only things in life worth worrying about are those that are within the individual’s control. Worrying about anything else is destined to end in disappointment or sorrow.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus: A Tragic Hero By Chad Gingery In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Brutus is a tragic hero for he was easily manipulated, naive and patriotic. Brutus believed that the Romans wanted him as the leader to assassinate Caesar, because of the forged notes that were sent to him by Cassius. The note explained how to assassinate Caesar by Speaking, Striking and Redressing. This note by Cassius caused Brutus to be manipulated into joining the conspirators, one of many flaws that leads to the downfall of Brutus and the assassination of Caesar. Brutus' trusting attitude toward Antony is an example of one of his flaws. Brutus allowed Antony to give a funeral speech for Julius Caesar and to be sure not to speak negatively about the conspiracy. This resulted in Antony leading a mob against the conspirators, Revenge!, About!, Seek!, Burn!, Fire!, Kill!, Slay!, Let not a traitor live.!(3.2.216). From this powerful speech and Brutus' naïveté, Antony became his nemesis, an event that would ultimately lead to Brutus' downfall. Brutus had an overabundance of love for his country which blinded him to the truth. Brutus had said in one of his soliloquies, If then that a friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Brutus had honored Caesar but Brutus felt that Caesar was too ambitious. Brutus also felt that Caesar made the Romans as slaves. Brutus was a patriotic man who did not see past his patriotism, to see the exploitation of his comrades. Brutus was noble in how he was benevolent towards his fellow man, but this nobility was a negative component that led to his inevitable loss of nobility. Brutus had many errors in his plans in Julius Caesar; one of those errors was an exorbitant amount of love for Rome. Tragedy is when a person is deprived of something loved. Brutus had been deprived of his nobility. Brutus was a tragic hero because of his trusting, obedient personality and his…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays