Preview

Famine, Affluence, and Morality Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Famine, Affluence, and Morality Essay Example
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
PHI 200 Mind and Machine
August 19, 2012

In this article Peter Singer’s goal is to shed light and bring awareness to the way people in the world are suffering due to poverty and natural disasters. He also explains how many people struggle to survive because they live below the poverty line, some on a dollar a day. Singer makes the point that we should be doing more to help those who are not in the position to help themselves. By using Bengal as an example of how richer countries react to a disaster Singer is able to prove his point (Singer, 1972).
Singer addresses the issues of why people do not donate. He says some people have the belief that it is the government’s responsibility to provide aid to those in need. He later states that it is a joint effort between us the citizens and the government to come to the rescue of those who are suffering. We live in a selfish society that believes that we should only take care of our own and not worry about others. Reliance on aid is one reason why people do not donate because they believe the society in need will become dependent on that service (Singer, 1972).
In his article he also argues that people are morally obligated to prevent as least some suffering by personally taking action. Singer says that it is in our power to prevent bad things and we can prevent the without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance. If we have the resources to do so, we the people should help those in need by suffering in the world, Singer makes a valid point by saying that are morally obligated to help, since help would relieve suffering (Singer, 1972).
Singer offers two principles in his article the first states that if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.” The second one states “If it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without sacrificing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought that you are happier than many children in the world? On the other hand, they do not have enough good conditions to live and develop themselves, including poverty. How will they struggle for their lives with their small hands? They probably need our help to rescue them out of danger. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, which is written by Peter Singer, is a solution to save children's lives. Singer persuades the reader to participate in helping children who lack food, get many diseases, and do not have good living conditions. His argument is that all of us should contribute to saving the children’s lives According to “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, this solution totally has the ability to be done by our help; however, I am not completely persuaded that I will help children by following Single’s solution.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, Peter Singer’s purpose is to draw attention and bring apprehension to the fashion the world’s people are being tormented directly to natural disasters and poverty. He also analyzes the amount of people struggling to survive in account to living under the poverty line, a few on a single dollar a day. Singer constructs the point that we need to be doing a greater job at helping those not in the status of being able to help themselves. By using Bengal as an example of how the countries that are rich respond to a disaster, Singer is capable of proving his point (Singer, 1972).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The primary objective of Singer’s post is to convey that we the folks have the capacity to assist men and women in need that is less lucky since it's our moral duty to do so. He uses the disaster in East Bengal for example. As per Singer, P. (1972), “Continuous poverty, a cyclone, and a civil war have turned a minimum of 9 million people into abandoned refugees; nonetheless, it's not beyond the capability of the wealthier countries to provide sufficient help to decrease further suffering to very small proportions” (pg. 229). He thinks that there's no reason at all for folks to suffer if other people have the capability to avoid it from happening. It’s our moral responsibility to…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peopl Singer Analysis

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How is it justified in anyway that we all spend money on luxury goods for ourselves at the cost of other lives? If we can prevent something bad from happening at a comparatively small cost to ourselves, we should indeed do so and do have a responsibility on situations like this. Singer states that we ought to prevent death and suffering from lack of food, shelter and medical care. As many may think that they have nothing to do with this, they clearly do. Many individuals would rather spend money on a shirt that they do not need while there are many who are dying of hunger at a speeding rate. How do these things go unnoticed? In this society today, most feel as if they have to keep up to “fit in”, by doing so, they think they should make every purchase that they see…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems as if Singer isn't giving us an obligation or choosing whether or not one has too. He makes it clear that if one wants to save the lives of a kid then one should give away all the money one has to offer and not use the money to use on themselves. Lets just say, one can't help but save innocent children's lives, one agrees one should, but one also agrees what if one needs money for an emergency but can't help the kids out because one is helping themselves out instead, would one still be a bad person? For example, in paragraph 23. Singer says, "Then, if we value the life of a child more than going to fancy restaurants, the next time we dine out we will know that we could have done something better with our money." Arguing towards this, one would say, the thing is that we have to give all our money to saving a child's life instead of going to dinner or spending any money for themselves. One completely disagrees, how would spending a little money for themselves making one a bad person, rather then saving some money for them, and giving some money away to help the kids. Why not do both, rather then give away all the money one worked hard to get. Another example of this would be, in "World Poverty and Our Obligation" Peter Singers argument is that "people are continuing to have luxurious items without helping other in need. we are not doing what we are meant to…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Singer claims that by donating to aid agencies or charity organisations, who will in turn pass it on to the needy in other poorer parts of the world that desperately need these resources, we can help prevent the suffering and death that comes unnecessarily if not for that fact that they had the basic necessities that we can offer help with, and this is true on the basis that we could, as an affluent society, comfortably do since many of us need not an extra piece of clothing or car that can be considered indulgences, and it could have been better used as donations to help those suffering. While it sounds logical that the able should help the needy especially if it is not too bothersome to do so, Singer might not have considered the reality that exists in aid agencies and their practices, whereby even with the best intentions, the donations might not truly be delivered to the recipient, leading to the idea that his premise might not be as sufficiently thought out, perhaps due to the time when it was written, which was a time before there was an increase in awareness of corruption in regards to global aid to the needy, and this does not support his premise, that people would be saved if we were all obligated to do so as realistically speaking, we cannot guarantee it. Singer is right to claim that donation equals aid and decreased suffering and that aid agencies is one good way to help the needy directly, but it is difficult to fully conclude this would, together with the other premises, help prevent suffering and death as it is difficult to completely prevent an issue that is prevalent in many third world countries, aside from East Bengal, the main focus of his argument, as it is multi-faceted and complex in nature. The fact that the people living within these countries are unable to fend for themselves might not fully be due to merely external events such as wars and natural disasters, as part…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective altruists recognize that the worth of anyone is equal to their own and believe that everyone should work towards good (Singer, 2015 p. 82). Through this reasoning, effective altruists are not influence by strong emotions to help out a single, recognizable person, but are motivated to reach out to the most number of people as they can even if these people were to remain anonymous. Their minds operate so that they prioritize helping out more people rather than a smaller group (Singer, 2015, p.82). In short, in this chapter, Singer emphasizes that actions must be grounded in the reasoning of working for the good of as many people as…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer's position on our moral obligation to aid the world's poor is characteristically frank and rests on three premises. The first premise states that ‘if we can prevent something bad without sacrificing something significant, we ought to do it.’ The second premise simply declares that ‘extreme poverty is bad’. Finally, the third premise claims that ‘there is some extreme poverty we can prevent without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance.’ Ultimately, the sum of the premises’ yield the conclusion that ‘we ought to prevent some extreme poverty.’ The premises are wisely formulated; it’s put forth in a fashion that…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Based on the article by Peter Singer entitled Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he attempts to move us to do more for charities and gives one astounding example. He uses starving children in Bengali and a drowning child.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do you think about the Singer article? Do you think he's right? Are we really morally obligated to give to relief efforts and other means of ending suffering until the point at which we would be giving up something of comparable moral worth? Why or why not?…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Singer Solution to World Poverty” addresses the urgency for a more generous world. Peter Singer presents lots of valid points within his work to the manner that incite one to question his morals and ethics. He states the gift of donation in an eccentric but motivating way. The purpose of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is to encourage the reader to change his aspect and consider the idea that he can contribute to those impoverished people of the world. In other words, Singer is writing to any person with the ability to donate. In this passage, he makes it clear that everyone has the opportunity to make a difference is other’s lives. And the facts that he uses are very connected to the way of a person’ thinking; making his arguments connect on a personal level. With the author and reader connected on a personal level, Singer’s arguments have a stronger effect. Singer asserts that“$200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old”. He later calls the reader to action by saying, “I…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first premise presents the idea of the “principle of equal consideration” which says that if a nonhuman entity has the ability to suffer, then it should be given equal moral consideration as humans. This premise means that if an nonhuman is suffering, we should take it into consideration and try to minimize the pain. According to Singer, suffering is a prerequisite to interests of taking their suffering into moral consideration, and if you have sentience, this should give you moral status similar to humans. People who object this thought would say something to the likes of “humans are the intellectually superior beings and have a right to utilize their surroundings (plants, animals, etc) to maximize their survival, mainly their happiness.” To this Singer would counter that intelligence is an arbitrary rebuttal. The argument to Singer is pointless because if you consider a certain level intelligence is the cut off for being granted the “principle of equal consideration” then you would have to exclude certain humans since some mentally challenged and young children do not possess the same mental capabilities as even some Apes and other mammals. This would allow, in theory, factories to test…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What this proposition means is, to be morally responsible and worthy of something, the action must be done in a way that the person believes it is their duty. An example of this is someone who is having thoughts of suicide not committing suicide because the reason that this heinous act is “selfish”.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays