Peopl Singer Analysis

How is it justified in anyway that we all spend money on luxury goods for ourselves at the cost of other lives? If we can prevent something bad from happening at a comparatively small cost to ourselves, we should indeed do so and do have a responsibility on situations like this. Singer states that we ought to prevent death and suffering from lack of food, shelter and medical care. As many may think that they have nothing to do with this, they clearly do. Many individuals would rather spend money on a shirt that they do not need while there are many who are dying of hunger at a speeding rate. How do these things go unnoticed? In this society today, most feel as if they have to keep up to “fit in”, by doing so, they think they should make every purchase that they see
Even if the money they give to infrastructure or food for them, it still is help and as long as it does not go back into their pockets. Many may say that this isn’t an issue that they think of on a daily basis and that if they saw it in front of them then they would do something about. However, they do see it. We see it when we go out in public, the homeless who ask for money. A meal that we eat could last them days of meals to the homeless who don’t have any food at all. It is an obligation to do so, as you would be extremely appreciative of someone who did it for you. Singer says we also shouldn’t do it because we feel like we have to, instead because it comes out of our hearts. Imagine if everyone in the entire world contributed to someone’s well being? Things like world hunger wouldn’t even occur. Also, it’s not like people aren’t aware, they just choose to not take the blindfold off as they think “it’s not my problem”. Another example would be walking passed a drowning child and you ignore it, this is morally