Preview

HEARTS R US

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
HEARTS R US
Case 13-3:
Summary:
This case is about a company named Hearts ‘R Us. This company provides research and development for medical devices. According to the information provided the company is in its early stage and has no products in the market. They have developed a Heart Valve System that would be revolutionary in the market if is approved. Also there’s another company called Bionic Body that is a biological medical device company, they have another product that would work well with this new Heart Valve System. Therefore both companies decided to fuse by agreement.
The agreement is as follows: $3.5 million preferred stock shares of Series A from Heart Company are sold to Bionics with a par value of $1 each. This transaction was completed on November 30, 2011, according to the information provided. This transaction gave Bionic specific rights: 1. Board Rights, 2. Mandatory Conversion right, 3. Contingent Redemption Rights, 4. Additional Protective Rights, 5. Right of first refusal and Co-Sale Rights.
The $3.5 millions of shares would be convertible in common stock according to the agreement when the IPO reaches net proceeds of at least $50 millions. It is stated that if on year five of the agreement the FDA has not yet approve the product to be in the market; the shares could be redeemed at its par value. Hearts R Us is a company that reports on a year basis and it’s planning to make an IPO soon.
There are a couple of issues surrounding this case. First is an early-stage company that doesn’t have the financial stability and this might create trouble for further transactions. The only product that might be coming to the market still depends on a series of trials and the approval of the FDA. Since the company is just starting; all of its accounting transactions have being recorded to comply with the covenants of its outstanding debt. Furthermore they are not required to comply with SEC and are currently not doing so. Also theirs an issue of how to be done to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cetuximab Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our company want to major in follow on biologics of bifunctional antibodies. The bifunctional antibodies market is still infancy and certainly first companies enter to this flied will have a competitive advantage over other biopharma companies. Therefor, we want to be one of the first companies starting in the field of follow on bifunctional antibodies. Nonetheless, many big pharma companies attracted to biosimilar market since they are in patent cleft thus they are trying to collaborate with other companies to produce biosimilar. For example, Pfizer established a collaborative with Biocon to produce biosimilar for insulin. As a new company, Innovace want to collaborate with biopharma company in China to magnify our business and brand name so then we can stand in the biosimilar…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    M4A3 AllStarFoodsCase

    • 10820 Words
    • 80 Pages

    are in excess of US$1 billion, and ALL STAR’s shares are traded publicly on the New…

    • 10820 Words
    • 80 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Law

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My stand in the case Gingerich vs. Protein Blenders, Inc. has to be with Gingerich based on the evidence presented. Gingerich formed a written contract with Protein Blenders, Inc. that Protein Blenders, Inc. would purchase a certain number of stocks at a given price per stock. After the contract was signed Protein Blenders, Inc. didn’t want to pay for the stocks they purchased due to the fact that unknown and not easily ascertainable value was available. This is where Protein Blenders, Inc. is at fault…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M International (“M”) and W Inc. (“W,” a competitor of M) have been engaged in long- standing litigation over a specific patent infringement matter. Below is a summary timeline of specific events that have taken place related to this matter:…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Assignment Wiley

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    (c) Issued $200,000 par value common stock upon conversion of bonds having a face value of…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Issues in Accounting

    • 4341 Words
    • 18 Pages

    1. On January 2, each company issued 3,200 shares of capital stock for $160,000 and…

    • 4341 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was instilled in 2002. In this act, three sections speak directly to the illegality of what Mr. Reed wants to do with the $1.2 million of equipment sold, but not to be billed until the following year. In section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act the financial statements must not contain any untrue statements, omission of material information, or be considered misleading ("Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance ", 2003). By reporting the sale of equipment before it took place, Excello would be misstating income and misleading shareholders to the…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the Accounting Standards Codification, the funding arrangement between Pharmagen (Pharma) and the private equity investor (PEI) would be applicable under the Research and Development Arrangements standard (ASC 730-20). This standard provides guidance for entities that are entered into a research and development (R&D) arrangement who acquire the results of research and development through the entire or partial funding by others (ASC 730-20-15-2). In this case, Pharma is receiving funding up to the amount of $500 million from PEI for R&D costs of the $1 billion of R&D costs Pharma estimates to incur for the development of their potential new drug X. This standard would be also relevant to Pharma’s case because the funds received from the PEI are restricted to R&D costs associated with drug X. No other accounting standard would be appropriate because the funds are strictly for R&D according to the Agreement.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The complaint alleged that the business plan of Covis enterprise was that it would try to sell itself or its assets soon after developing a market in the pharmaceuticals that it acquired. Based on that description, merger discussions and negotiations were to be expected by Plaintiffs. Therefore, the pendency of merger negotiations thus signaled no more than the Covis enterprise’s continued adherence to its announced corporate…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mr. Duncan has decided to eliminate preferred stock as one of the alternatives and focus on the others. EduSoft’s investment banker estimates that EduSoft could issue a bond-with-warrants package consisting of a 20-year bond and 27 warrants. Each warrant would have a stike price of $25 and 10 years unitil expiration. It is estimated that each warrant, when detached and traded separately, would have a value of $5. The coupon on a similar bond but without warrants would be 10%.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case is about a joint venture between the American company Blue Ridge which is owned by Delta Foods and the Spanish company Terralumen in Spain. Problems arose because of disagreement concerning the future growth rates set by Delta which are considered as unrealistic by Terralumen.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My main leverage point would be that trying to get rid of those stocks at a lower price than you originally wanted to is not worth getting investigated and tried by federal officials. In this case, the FDA did not refuse the drug; they simply said they needed more information about it before they could release it to the public. So even though Stewart and Waksal would lose money during the waiting period,…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Holding Fast Case Study

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. This case starts out in a lab that is located in a building that is operated by Crescordia. Crescordia is a company that makes a range of products such as artificial hips and scalps but also is one of the few companies that sell fixation devices. At the beginning of the case Crescordia holds a seminar for orthopedic surgeons so they can better familiarize themselves with the products and procedures that are needed when dealing with using these fixation plates. During this seminar the CEO Peter Walsh enters excitedly to see what is going on. You can tell right from the start that he is a very big people person and is incredibly interested in finding out the needs and what surgeons are saying about the products that he puts out. After Peter Walsh enters the seminar is put on hold and they all go out to lunch. During lunch one of the surgeons launched into a story about having to remove a resorbable plate, which are fixation devices that instead of having to be removed by doctors after the bone is healed these would just disintegrate after the bone had been healed which would mean that you would not have to have surgery again to remove the plate. The story however takes a sad turn as you find out that most resorbable plates have a lot of problems that have not been figured out and is still a technology that is not capable of doing what it says. The surgeons asked Peter Walsh when Crescordia would plan to launch its own resorbable’s and his response was that Crescordia is a company that has a reputation for quality and that resorbable’s were not at the stage where they would live up to what they set out to do. Resorbable’s are a huge potentially untapped market so Peter Walsh made it his first priority to find out where Crescordia is at with its resorbable’s. He talked with Gary Miskimen who is the head of R&D. He basically confirmed to Walsh that resorbable’s still are not perfect and that they could not do any more lab…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Forming a joint venture with the biotech firm Biopart, equally sharing all future costs and profits.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy Fu and Moog, Inc

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The proceeds of the sale are $89.125 million. This would increase stockholder’s equity and assets by the same amount. The company uses $84.5 million of…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays