Preview

NSA Surveillance Debate Paper Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NSA Surveillance Debate Paper Essay Example
Pro
I strongly affirm the resolved: Government Security Agencies Are Justified In Monitoring Private Communication For The Sake Of National Security.
Definitions:
Government Surveillance - (noun) the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime
Justified: Allowed For A Proper Reason
Private Communication: Any Amount Of Physical Or Electronic Contact Between People In A Private And Secretive Communication.
National Security: The Protection Of The Peoples In That Nation Or State.
Value: Utilitarianism: The Pursuit Of Benefit For The Greater Amount Of Peoples. In this case benefit means the prevention of the loss of lives of a greater amount of people regardless the cost.
Value Criterion: Laws barring government surveillance groups be lifted in regards to amount of laws. These surveillance programs be allocated more money so as to purchase or acquire automated systems to filter through metadata acquired by these programs.
The U.S. government can fully monitor air, space, and sea for potential attacks from abroad. But it has limited access to the channels of cyber-attack and cyber-theft, because they are owned by private telecommunication firms, and because Congress strictly limits government access to private communications. “I can’t defend the country until I’m into all the networks,” General Alexander reportedly told senior government officials a few months ago.
Contention 1: Domestic Surveillances are utilized properly and are being used effectively towards threats to the United States.
Subpoint A: The NSA domestic surveillance programs have assisted in the prevention of over 50 terrorist activities.
During the “lifetime” of the two domestic surveillance programs being utilized by the NSA, these programs have assisted in stopping a total of 54 terrorist activities, including potential terrorist plots. These two programs involve the collection of metadata of phone calls made in the U.S. and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Act, aimed at updating both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the Electronics Communications Privacy Act of 1986 is composed of 10 titles all of which were hurried through Congress on October 24th, 2001 and passed the senate the following day, “…with little deliberation. Unlike a typical statute, neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate issued a report on the PATRIOT act.” (Standler, 2007-2008, p. 4) To this day, the Patriot Act remains controversial; its supporters uphold it as a requirement for The War on Terrorism and for the enforcement of modern electronic communications law. The Act’s critics cite its numerous infringements on civil and individual rights. Title II, considered the most controversial, deals directly with surveillance, wiretapping, and computer fraud. Title II also details sanctions placed on trade with the Taliban, Syria and North Korea. The Patriot Act’s Title II, Enhanced Surveillance Procedures is a breach of privacy and infringes upon the tenants of our Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Surveillance is a feature used by the modern government. Surveillance is supposedly used by the government for preventing /investigating crimes and gathering information, however it can also be used by criminal organisations for planning and committing crimes, which is ironic. Technology allows the government to track online activities, people’s movements and communications. Most people would consider surveillance a breach of privacy and it is opposed by numerous activist groups since most authoritarian governments don’t have any domestic restrictions, which means that governments are allowed to access your information whenever they choose without relevant justification. George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty Four” warn of the negative effects of surveillance and how the government can use it to control people. It is believed if…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Developed “to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes” the USA Patriot Act, bears the formal name ‘‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act, 2001, p. 1). Heretofore referred to as the “Patriot Act” the USA Patriot Act was signed into law within 6 weeks from initial draft to final approval supporting the enforcement of laws for the ultimate protection of the United States and her citizens by granting access to persons and information with liberal criminal and civil procedure exceptions. The Patriot Act immediately granted broad-based interrogation, surveillance and isolation abilities to law enforcement when investigating “crimes against terror” (US Government, 2011)…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to tracking cellular-telephone communication, agents can now subpoena Internet providers to surrender records of e-mails that they judge suspicious. This component of the law was significant, given that the men who hijacked the four planes on September 11 had communicated extensively about their plans via the Internet. The Patriot Act also sanctioned funds to triple the number of border-patrol agents and Immigration and Naturalization Service inspectors along the northern border.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros/Cons Patriot Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The House of Representatives passed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 on October 24, 2001. This is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (USA Patriot Act, 2001). The events of September 11, 2001 led to the near unanimous support for the Patriot Act. In this paper, our learning team will discuss the many pros and cons of the Patriot Act of 2001.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By filtering things like calls, texts, and emails terrorist attacks can be prevented. During a visit to Berlin President Obama said “At least fifty threats have been avoided because of the information that is gathered.This information has not only avoided attacks in the United States, but in other countries around the world. So lives have been saved.” The information gathered has been successful at least fifty times already. This shows that all the information used by the NSA is…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They argue that it has been effective in the fight against terrorism and that it is important to keep the U.S safe.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: USLegal.com (2010) Title II Enhanced Surveillance Procedures, Retrieved on February 9, 2012 from http://civilrights.uslegal.com/usa-patriot-act/provisions-of-the-patriot-act/title-ii-enhanced-surveillance-procedures/…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The government should worry citizens, by hiring people to hack into their lives. The National Security Agency, NSA, is “inside” everything from phones to major websites like Google and Yahoo. The NSA is responsible for code breaking and getting information from phones and the internet. The NSA has headquarters in the United Kingdom as well. They try to focus overseas instead of domestically to prevent any serious crime and to defend the UK’s economic interest. Because the NSA doesn’t trust its own U.S. citizens, violates the fourth amendment, and made programs to “hack” us, the NSA invades the privacy of citizens and should be stopped.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    National Security Agency Director Keith Alexander said surveillance programs have helped thwart more than 50 “potential terrorist events” around the world. Alexander said at least 10 of the attacks were set to take place in the United States, suggesting that most of the terrorism disrupted by the program had been set to occur abroad. And in defense of the program he added “NSA also disclosed that counterterrorism officials targeted fewer than 300 phone numbers or other “identifiers” last year in the massive call-tracking database secretly assembled by the U.S. government.”. FBI Director Sean Joyce said the Web traffic program (NSA data collection) had contributed to arrests averting a plot to bomb the New York Stock Exchange that resulted in criminal charges in 2008 (Gerstein, 2013). Since the government was able to foil 50 plots around the world using the data they collected since 2001, is it worth being spied on? Some may argue that yes since life itself is more important than privacy but that brings me back to my question. Was Ben Franklin incorrect when he stated that “He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.”? Some may argue that technology and society has changed and its time we protect ourselves against extremist by giving up some of our liberties. Bruce Schneier in his bestselling book Data and Goliath explains how we are fed a false narrative of how our surveillance state is able to stop terrorist attacks before they happen. In fact, Schneier argues, the idea that our government is able to parse all the invasive and personal data they collect on us is laughable. He added that The NSA repeatedly uses a connect-the-dots metaphor…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander, then director of the National Security Agency (NSA), told Congress more than 50 potential terrorist attacks had been thwarted by two controversial programs tracking more than a billion phone calls and vast swaths of Internet data each day. Additionally, the attacks on would-be targets such as the New York Stock Exchange were prevented by consuming telephone and Internet information from millions of Americans since September 11, 2001. In testimony, General Alexander said, "In recent years, these programs, together with other intelligence, have protected the U.S and our allies from terrorist threats across the globe to include helping prevent the potential terrorist events over 50 times since…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act Essay

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The USA PATRIOT Act stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism." This act was enacted 45 days after more than 3,000 American lives were lost at the state of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The intended purpose of the act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes. There are four primary initiatives of the act in improving our nation’s counterterrorism efforts: It allows investigators to use the tools available to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking; facilitates information sharing and cooperation between government agencies so they can detect patterns of terrorist activities; update the law compatible to new technologies and new threats; and raise penalties…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My value criterion is: maximizing life and wellbeing. We should favor the greatest prosperity of life and wellbeing for innocent individuals, noting that as a government, it…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is not spending enough time and resource in surveillance, which is resulting in the threats and decrease of national security. Surveillance is the act of observing, or monitoring a person. Monitoring a person can include the use of cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. Events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, and the attack on 9/11 lead to a law former President Bush passed. "On October 26th, 2001, Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act." (Podesta) Government surveillance is an essential part of everyday life because not only does it keep the country under control, but ensures safety for Americans.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays