I strongly affirm the resolved: Government Security Agencies Are Justified In Monitoring Private Communication For The Sake Of National Security.
Definitions:
Government Surveillance - (noun) the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime
Justified: Allowed For A Proper Reason
Private Communication: Any Amount Of Physical Or Electronic Contact Between People In A Private And Secretive Communication.
National Security: The Protection Of The Peoples In That Nation Or State.
Value: Utilitarianism: The Pursuit Of Benefit For The Greater Amount Of Peoples. In this case benefit means the prevention of the loss of lives of a greater amount of people regardless the cost.
Value Criterion: Laws barring government surveillance groups be lifted in regards to amount of laws. These surveillance programs be allocated more money so as to purchase or acquire automated systems to filter through metadata acquired by these programs.
The U.S. government can fully monitor air, space, and sea for potential attacks from abroad. But it has limited access to the channels of cyber-attack and cyber-theft, because they are owned by private telecommunication firms, and because Congress strictly limits government access to private communications. “I can’t defend the country until I’m into all the networks,” General Alexander reportedly told senior government officials a few months ago.
Contention 1: Domestic Surveillances are utilized properly and are being used effectively towards threats to the United States.
Subpoint A: The NSA domestic surveillance programs have assisted in the prevention of over 50 terrorist activities.
During the “lifetime” of the two domestic surveillance programs being utilized by the NSA, these programs have assisted in stopping a total of 54 terrorist activities, including potential terrorist plots. These two programs involve the collection of metadata of phone calls made in the U.S. and the