Preview

PHIL 201 Study Guide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
PHIL 201 Study Guide
Study Guide: Lesson 13
Justification, Part 1: Noetic Structure

Tasks

View and take notes on the presentation, “An Overview of Issues in Contemporary Justification, Part 1.”

What are 3 characteristics of a person’s noetic structure?
The sum total of everything that person believes
It recognizes the differing degress of certainty, firmness, and conviction with which people hold their beliefs.
Characterized by how beliefs are related together.
Explain coherentism and the 3 problems with it.
Coherentism: All beliefs fall into one category. No beliefs are more foundational than the others.
Problems:
Circularity: How do I justify my belief in P? It coheres with Q.
Isolation Problem: Coherentism isolates my beliefs from the external world.
Plurality: It is possible to have 2 coherent systems that are logically incompatible.

Read chapter 4 of Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous, “Foundationalism.” As you do, consider the following questions and points:

What is the root idea of foundationalism?
Each of us holds a set of beliefs basically or immediately while we hold other beliefs non basically or mediately.
Why would one adopt a foundationalist approach to justification?
Because they are epistemic engies of our noetic structures, imparting to all of our non-basic beliefs, while not themselves requiring justification from any other beliefs – this support goes just one way.
What is the regress argument?
Taking for granted the general reliability of your conscious faculties, and indeed must take them for granted.
What are the 3 basic components of foundationalism?
Basic or immediate beliefs- Form the bedrock of what all we believe undergirding everything else we are justified in believing.
Mediate or non-basic beliefs- Everything else we believe
Basing Relation- Specifies how the epistemic merit of our basic beliefs is to be transferred to out non-basic beliefs.
What are the characteristics of strong foundationalism? Specifically

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vocabulary Week 1 Hum/130

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    |8. Dogma |To be a part of a group that believes, and has strong faith |…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Read the preface and chapter 1 of Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous, “The Nature of Epistemology.” As you do, make sure you understand the following points and questions:…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belief Donald Lopez

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These conclusions about ideology and belief go hand in hand. In most cases, a belief is held unconsciously, depending on how strong the belief is. Because of this, there cannot be a remotely accurate judgement on a belief through a simply play on words. Instead, in order to gain meaning and understanding of the belief and its use, there has to be an observation for its role in the everyday life of the one who holds that belief (Lopez 24).…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schommer-Aikins, M. (2006). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systematic model and coordinated research approach. Educational psychologist.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Correct Use of Terminology

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The term beliefs can be defined as “something believed; an opinion or conviction” (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/belief) also it can be defined as, “Confidence in the truth or existence of something not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof” (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/belief).…

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beliefs are the things that we hold dearest to us, believing that they are true and correct. Most of the time though, there’s no proof or evidence to support these beliefs. The biggest belief in many people’s lives is religion. People’s religious beliefs can vary depending on their faith. Christians believe that God made the world in 7 days, when you die you will go to heaven or hell depending on how you conducted your life and that Jesus died on a cross. Jehovah’s Witnesses base their faith on Christianity but have different beliefs. They believe that when you die there is no heaven or hell and Jesus died on a stake not a cross, that’s why they do not use the cross in their faith.…

    • 2856 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Working within the framework of foundationalism where there are basic foundational beliefs that are “brute” in the sense that they need no further justification than a pure belief in the proposition itself. A proposition, is a sentence or utterance of something that is said about the world that can either be true or false ( ? ). Common propositional paradoxes are things like statements cannot be both true and false at the same time and something cannot be completely red or completely blue at the same time; they are statements made about the happenings within the world. Pryor, a rationalist, agrees that epistemologically appropriate (Pryor 181) beliefs stem from one singular and stark infallible basic belief from which all other auxiliary and supplementary beliefs are initially predicated. These ‘foundations’ of knowledge as I will call them, are independent and distinct of propositional beliefs much like axioms of mathematics. This notion that immediate justification is not only favourable, but also necessary, is explained in Pryor’s outcomes of the infinite regress (Pryor 184). Pryor presents four outcomes that outline how an epistemological regress ends: that the regressive chain continues on infinitely (infinitism), that what makes a person justified in believing a proposition is based off beliefs do not have to be justified, but in turn can justify other beliefs, that some beliefs justify other beliefs but do not get their justification from other beliefs (foundationalism), or the trails of justification form closed circuits so that the justification of a belief comes to include the belief itself as a justifier (Pryor 184). This differs from what is considered ‘mediate’ justification where your belief is predicated upon other propositions that make the current, true. Pryor is…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Credo Paper

    • 1731 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To have a belief is to have confidence, faith and trust in something that cannot always be proven right or wrong. Some families are required to have certain beliefs due to religions where as other individuals develop their own core beliefs based on experience or teaching from mentors in their life. Whether they are taught to you or you create them yourself, whatever you believe in makes up your core beliefs. Most of my core beliefs deal with my relationship with God, but a few beliefs go into how I live my life.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history, philosophers have been trying to come up with a clear way to provide the justification of our beliefs and knowledge. Noah Lemos offers readers explanations of both foundationalism and coherentism for theories of justification. These two different theories offer very different ways to explain the basis of our beliefs. For a foundationalist, they believe that all of our beliefs can be broken down until we reach a basic belief. This belief would be largely independent of other beliefs and not derived from other beliefs. A coherentist feels that a belief can be reasonably justified if it is coheres with our other beliefs.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The human race, ever since its existence began, has been seeking truth. Living in a limited spherical space has forced us to adapt to communities. This has involved accepting laws, social contracts, morals, values, and most importantly, communal knowledge. Our pursuit of knowledge has been modeled by different groups and their accepted beliefs. Every new piece of knowledge has been built upon existing knowledge and that new piece of knowledge is the basis for the one to come so we end up with a thread of information that is to long to track. This pressures us to constantly operate under groupthink, physiological phenomena in which the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic exploration of alternatives; we accept beliefs as truth without having sufficient evidence or any at all to prove that they are in fact true. Not only are we automatically accepting our community 's ideas as truth but we are encouraged to. The key to success is to think globally is what the world says, but are we to accept every global belief? "Truth is that which the community ultimately settles down" is what Charles Pierce concludes. Through this quote, he implies that truth is the outcome of a process. Pierce flawlessly portrays human tendency, however it is questionable whether his definition of truth is functioning. In order to reliably distinguish between true and false claims a universally working definition for truth must be adopted (This does not necessarily mean that knowers will be able to know what is true and what is false but they will, however be able to have a rational conversation about knowledge). A true statement will be true independent of what anyone believes. It is easier to take truth as a single point in a coordinate plane, there is only of its kind and it will be there regardless if you see it or not. It would be…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many ways epistemology clears the way for metaphysical construction or hypothesis. By adhering to the principles of one branch of philosophy, it allows us to become better at searching within the other. It is true that epistemic ideas are often knocked down by metaphysics, but when one considers that it is entirely possible to base metaphysical ideas on epistemology, it becomes clear that the branches of philosophy are very much intertwined and somewhat interdependent upon each other for clarity and reason. It is a strange philosophical symbiosis from which a magnificent and new organism emerges.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dejohn

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question today is, is the truth the same for everybody. The answer to that question is yes and no. I say that because if were in an argument about something there is only one truth to that. But, if we have different beliefs in something then no the truth isn’t the same. I’m picking one answer today and that’s no. To me everyone has a different point of view, and belief. So their truth can be very opposite and different. Truth is basically based on belief.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    TOK Essay

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How would one rate the effectiveness of their personal experiences or ideological bias on their knowledge claims? Most people would think their knowledge claim is a true belief, but without some form of proof, data, or authority verification it is not a true knowledge claim. It is known that what distinguishes knowledge from belief is truth, but if you only believe a portion, it may be true or false. Therefore, it should be a justified true belief. It is important to be open-minded and except all things that are new to you, but it is your choice to decide how far you let your personal experiences affect your knowledge claims. While looking at any of the different Areas of Knowledge, what one group believes to be true, may be false to another. With a fast paced, ever-changing environment the ideological bias of others tends to interfere with our personal understanding of the world.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanities

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When it comes to knowing or believing how do we decide what way to follow? There are two ways to look at it empirical or reasoning. Empirical being evidence based knowledge of a certain experience we have had in the past. Reasoning being based on logic, or innate (born with) knowledge. Is it possible that both could be right and combined with each other? When we talk about our significant others do we know for fact that they love us, or do we believe that they love us? Melissa is Troy’s wife and he tends to think that she loves him whole heartedly. This being based on empirical evidence on the things she does for him.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS ETHICS & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OCS AGENDA • Understanding Ethics • Managing Business Ethics • Corporate Social Responsibility • Complexity of Ethical Issues • Ethical Leadership • Evaluation of Corporate Governance • Internal & External Corporate Governance mechanisms • Corporate Governance Ratings OCS Scams OCS Values • Fundamental beliefs • Principles for good, right and just • Evaluate something vis-à-vis a Standard • Integrity, Patriotism, Fairness OCS Morals • Values attributing to a system of beliefs • Values derived from a higher authority • Religious system or political system OCS Understanding Ethics • Greek word “ethos” meaning character…

    • 5886 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics