Preview

R. (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 961

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
632 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
R. (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 961
The appellants (M, N and L) appealed against a decision ([2012] EWHC 2381, [2012] 3 F.C.R. 233) concerning the illegality of assisted suicide and euthanasia. M, N and L wished to die but were incapable of ending their own lives without the assistance of a third party or euthanasia carried out by the third party. It was likely that those who provided such assistance would be guilty of assisted suicide under the Suicide Act 1961 s.2(1), whilst those who carried out euthanasia would be guilty of murder. After the decision in R. (on the application of Purdy) v DPP [2009] UKHL 45, [2010] 1 A.C. 345, the DPP had set out in a policy statement the factors to be taken into account when considering whether to prosecute assisted suicide cases. The court was required to determine whether (i) to grant a declaration, as sought by L, that necessity should be a defence to a charge of euthanasia and assisted suicide where certain conditions were met; (ii) the blanket legal prohibition on providing assistance to those wishing to die constituted a disproportionate interference with the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8; (iii) the DPP should set out in greater detail, as sought by M, how he would exercise his discretion to initiate prosecution in cases of assisted suicide in order to make the law more accessible and foreseeable.

L's sought issue could not be resolved for the following reasons: (a) the sanctity of life was a fundamental principle of common law. There was no self-evident reason why it should give way to the values of autonomy or dignity; (b) there was no right to commit suicide; s.1 of the 1961 Act merely conferred immunity from the criminal process for those who actually committed suicide; (c) it was not appropriate for the court to fashion a defence of necessity in such a complex and controversial field, it was a matter for Parliament, Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] A.C. 789 considered; (d) A question was raised of how the courts could develop a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Associate Ltd (2005) article show that in 1971 a Gp Practitioner murdered 250 patients over a 27 year period in practice. The author believes that the event that occurred in the article contradicts the legal law of rights to life because the Gp deprived 250 patients of unlawful violence and death (Libadmin 2010). It could be argued life is sacred; every individual has a right to preserve their own life and therefore is wrong to end another’s regardless of ethnic or cultural differences (rsrevision 2015). Homicide act (1957) questions the rights of life as it creates a double effect whether it is ethical right if a patient complies with ending their life. For example, patient wanting death through overdose or pain relief, we are unable to know…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Th ink sw ap Do cu me nt Question: In what ways does a comparative study accentuate the distinctive contexts of King Richard III and Looking For Richard? Question 2: To what extent have the connections you have made between the two texts shown how particular concerns, although timeless, impact differently on individuals in different contexts.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    and U.S. Law” by Stephen Hoffman is credible because he practices law in Minnesota where he also received his J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School and his LL.M. from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. Hoffman’s purpose for the article is to explain the controversial and complex issues of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Hoffman explains the difference and similarity between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as well as classifying the different types such as ‘voluntary’ and ‘nonvoluntary.’ He states the difference between active and passive euthanasia which plays a role for a physician’s duty in a patient’s death. He also explains what medical doctrine of double effect is. Then he explains the common law necessity defense and a physician’s conflicting duties that deal with euthanasia. Later in the article, he explains the legal doctrines of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in European countries such as the United Kingdom, Switzerland and The Netherlands and states in North America such as Oregon, Washington, and…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to these tragic events Nicklinson’s fight for the ‘right to die’ is argued by the high court. Although, it may be his wish; but the court see his it as he is using euthanasia is taking advantage of his vulnerability.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major claim of this editorial, is that legalized doctor-assisted suicide is euthanasia. We are asking for the right to decide though the court system, if an individual’s life is valuable or not. Some may claim we are just hiding or heartless nature and corrupt moral standards to justify our actions.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide is “the voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Physician-assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life” (MedicineNet.com, 2004). Many times this ethical issue arises when a terminally-ill patient with and incurable illness, whom is given little time to live, usually less than six-months, has requested a physician’s assistance in terminating one’s life. This practice with the terminally ill is known as euthanasia. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia is a controversial topic that brings up many ethical issues and the rights of the patients the physicians serve. Many questions arise when this topic is discussed. For example, does an individual have the right to end their life, if prolonging it will only cause more pain and suffering? Should families, who do not want to lose a loved one, be allowed to prolong the pain in the life of a terminally ill family member so they do not experience loss? Is this more or less ethical than letting the person die? This paper will examine why terminally-ill patients should be allowed to make decisions regarding their care and their life. This paper will examine a utilitarian perspective on physician-aided suicide, which provides a solid argument for allowing physician-assisted suicides in certain circumstances.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia is a widely debated and controversial topic in our society. It is believed that the principle of PAS and euthanasia portrays, “merciful acts that deliver terminally ill patients from painful and protracted death” (page 477, column 2). In the paper, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View,” John D. Arras discusses the subject and states that while he agrees with patients making decisions, implementing laws supporting PAS and euthanasia is a huge threat to our social order. However, John D. Arras also concludes that he does not disapprove with the possibility of having a legislative policy in favor of PAS/euthanasia, only if there is “sufficient evidence of reliability of various safeguards” (page 477, column 2).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A state’s prohibition on assisted suicide, like all homicide laws, advances this interest. The Supreme Court concluded that the state of Washington had the right to decline to make judgments about the quality of life that a particular individual may enjoy, and the state could certainly conclude that all persons’ lives, from beginning to end, regardless of physical or mental condition, deserve full protection of the law.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The debate on assisted suicide in Canada is very controversial among groups who believe that these laws are taking away patient’s right to make a decision about their life while suffering from severe pain or a “right to die”. An example of assisted suicide is the case of Sue Rodriguez, where she was suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that was leading to total loss of physical control and dependence on a respirator. She wanted to maintain as much control over her own dying and death as possible and this is why she applied in Supreme Court to get permission for assisted suicide (Sneddon, 2006). But the Supreme Court rejected her request and ignored the fact that this prohibition discriminates against those who can not commit suicide without assistance and they are prevented by law from doing something that physically able are permitted to do. These laws might serve the goal of equality of autonomy but on the other side comes at the rate of being unfair. Such regulations prohibit the rights of competent vulnerable, disabled, and terminally ill people who are well aware of their situation that they will never get back to their healthy life and request to end life. From moral perspective, they face injustice by not getting the right to control their life. Making assisted suicide legalized will provide them justice and they will…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    b) ‘The concept of the Sanctity of Life is not helpful in understanding the issues surrounding euthanasia.’ Discuss. (10 marks)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In her article, “Thank God Hippocrates Was Pagan”, Jennifer Lahl comments that many non-secular arguments against PAS are mostly ignored; however, arguments regarding the fairness of Death with Dignity laws are strong contenders over the debate regarding PAS (40). She questions whether it is right that only those who are terminally ill can legally end their suffering when others cannot since they are not terminal (Lahl 41). Her contention should be acknowledged when considering possible solutions since one of the pro-PAS arguments is that personal autonomy allows for choice. Another article, a critique written by Manne Sjöstrand, Gert Helgesson, Stefan Eriksson, and Niklas Juth, analyzes two anti-PAS points of view (226). Though Sjöstrand et al. do not argue against PAS, their analysis of protesters’ arguments contribute an unbiased overview of justifications the protesters provide regarding their stance (229). One argument considers autonomy to be a prudential value which should not be compromised by actions that prevent future autonomy, such as suicide (Sjöstrand et al. 227). The other, referred to as the Kantian argument, claims that suicide undermines the value of one’s person (Sjöstrand et al. 228). Where supporters of PAS believe personal autonomy grants patients the freedom the commit suicide, protesters believe the same personal autonomy should be…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assisted Suicide Speech

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page

    People all over the world have a misconception about what the term ‘assisted suicide’ truly entails. Assisted suicide is suicide committed with the aid of another person, most times a caretaker, family member or physician. Assisted suicide is becoming more and more common across the world. With the House of Lords trying to pass a bill to legalize assisted suicide in the UK and the continuously rising rates in Switzerland. While there is no federal law involving assisted suicide in the U.S, the act is legal in five states. Some people like to believe that they are helping their terminally or mentally ill family member or friend when it comes to this act, but are they really? I believe that the government should set boundaries and explain in…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics