Preview

St. Thomas Aquinas: the Summa Theologica Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
St. Thomas Aquinas: the Summa Theologica Essay Example
AP European History
May 14, 2011
St. Thomas Aquinas: The Summa Theologica

St. Thomas Aquinas’s “The Summa Theologica” is a document meant to summarize the difference between divine laws and human laws. This document explains whether these two types of laws are just or unjust. Aquinas demonstrates how laws are the reason for the common good which is made by those who care for their community, and how all the laws come from divine reasons which according to the document are understood by men. The first part of this document analyzes how laws are just or unjust depending on the impact they have on our conscience. Aquinas seems to represent the idea that just laws are in our minds because they are the laws of God and they are just depending on three things; the purpose they have, the authority of the law maker, and their form (Aquinas 1). The author makes it clear that laws are also just when their main purpose is the common good, when the person that makes the law doesn’t surpass his rights when making that law, and when a person and everything they own belongs to the community. Finally, there are laws that burden one set of people and do not burden the others equally and these are the just and legal laws that stay in our minds. The second part of this document explains how laws are unjust because they go against the human good. A ruler can sometimes impose laws that are not good for the society but only good to himself, and also he might try to go beyond his own power in order to make those laws. Aquinas mentions, “Or, a law in its own form may look toward the common good, but not impose burdens which have a due proportion to the positions of the subjects within the community” (Aquinas 2). This quote means that a law might seem like it has a good purpose but it has no burden and this affects the people in the community. According to St. Augustine a law that is not just is no law at all. As a result of this, these laws do not stay in your conscience,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his Summa Theologica number seventeen, article two, Aquinas is trying to answer the question of whether there is falsity in the senses and, if there is, how it exists. He concludes that falsity does exist in the senses in the way that the senses can misjudge objects. Aquinas maintains that the senses can perceive the likeness of an object in one of three ways. The first is by the color of the object and other proper qualities which occur in only one sense. The second is by the common qualities of shape and size which can be validated by more than one of the senses. Finally, the third occurs accidently and not of its own nature. He follows that by stating the premises for his argument. Aquinas’s first premise is the sense gains false knowledge…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law is good. Man, in his needs, has different motivations for law in his society. His secular needs require striving for justice, social stability and punishment. However, in the area of religious influence, law should promote morality so that believers can get close to god or be separated and condemned by god. As man and society evolves, the purpose of law has remained the same – to punish and deter.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    explicitly noted in his writings, that he was influenced by the work of 13th century philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas. King’s functional definition of natural law was taken from Aquinas’ seminal and most known work, “Summa Theologica”. King agrees with St. Thomas Aquinas’ key precepts of natural law that good should be promoted and carried out, while evil must be identified and avoided. It was King’s view that he had not broken a moral or legal law. King strongly believed in Aquinas teachings, stating that “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law”. King’s arguments in his letter accurately reflect Aquinas’ philosophy on natural…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas as a Neo-Platonist believes that existence is a good in itself, therefore, all things that improve existence are good. For humans our most important act of existence is the one that separates us from the animals around us, our ability to reason. As animals are not provisioned with morality, then our morality must be based on reason. Reason…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas saw the conscience as the natural ability of a rational human being to understand the difference between right and wrong, and to apply the most basic moral principles to particular situations. Aquinas thought that there would be problems with people following their own moral sense, which lead him to natural moral law (NML). He thought that everyone should follow NML because they are moral laws found in nature (e.g. sex for procreation). He thought that the conscience was the intellectual part of you because you work out what to do using natural reasoning. Without following NML, people might have distorted judgments from their passions, ignorance and society and therefore different views on right and wrong. Therefore although he says that it is always right to follow one’s conscience, he does recognise that people may still get things wrong, through ignorance or making a mistake. Therefore Aquinas would not say that conscience should always be obeyed because a person may not be aware of the relevant moral principle. In order for conscience to work, a person needs to have some background information…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pope John Paul II states that our freedom and God’s law is most noticeably present in our conscience. When we set our freedom against the moral law, we risk deviating from the teachings of the Church or even contradicting them entirely. Some theologians have gone as far as to state that the conscience is simply a guide to give a general view of the man’s life, rather than “the sanctuary of man, where he is alone with God whose voice echoes within him” (John Paul II 55). Some also state that the Church’s intervention in the life of the faithful is the true cause of the conflicts in our conscience, which could be solved by allowing Christians to make their own decisions regardless of the moral law. This idea falls under scrutiny, however, as it proposes a double standard for the moral law. To support this argument, one must separate the inherent truths of the moral law so as to not conflict with the yearnings of the individual conscience.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Source of the law is God. The root of obligation is in the divine conception of the order proper to the universe. Human Law, to be just and morally obligating, must therefore be rooted in Divine Law. People cannot originate the law themselves. Aquinas rejects Divine Right theory because it contributes a divine quality to political authority. No authority, not even the sovereign, can impose an obligation on the citizen where it is not already latent in the nature of things.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just law – one that is in line w/moral laws or laws of God; any law that uplifts human personality…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In all of these, God is the central truth. Aquinas believes that law was given to us by God’s divine existence, and as such is the eternal law. According to Aquinas, because God is inherently good, any laws and their subsequent punishments that are based on eternal law are considered virtuous and good as they are a means to make man moral and true. Laws based on tyranny cannot be considered true laws because their basis is personal rather than divine and therefore they do not serve God and do not contribute to the greater good.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Healthcare Fraud and Abuse

    • 3859 Words
    • 16 Pages

    “Laws are made to restrain and punish the wicked; the wise and good do not need them as a guide, but only as a shield against rapine and oppression; they can live civilly and orderly, though there were no law in the world.”…

    • 3859 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas is a prominent figure for someone who believes, preaches, and teaches about Gods existence. Aquinas made what is known to be called the Summa Theologica. This piece of writing is known to talk about the relationship between God and man along with questions and articles to show that God truly exists. Part one, question number two in the Summa talks about the existence of God. In this section of Aquinas’ writing, he gives three articles which are questions to support his claim on the topic. The article contains objections to each question and Aquinas thus responds to it show what he thinks of them. This also includes Aquinas’ five proofs for the existence of God.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays