Preview

The Law Relating to the Remedies for Defective Goods Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Law Relating to the Remedies for Defective Goods Essay Example
LAW Coursework Essay April 2012

Q: Evaluate whether the law relating to the remedies for defective goods can be considered satisfactory.

In this essay I will outline the remedies available in cases of defective goods from the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the criteria that constitutes a material breach. I will then go on to outline the other remedies available in supply of goods cases such as hire purchase and hire etc., using the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 and the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. After discussing all the remedies available, I will then evaluate the adequacy of the law relating to these remedies through case examples and decide whether this law can be considered satisfactory.

The remedies that a consumer can have, in Scotland, for defective good are outlined in section 15B of the Sale of Goods Act 1979. This section states that if the seller is in breach of the contract of sale then the buyer’s remedies will be an entitlement “to claim damages and if the breach is material, to reject any goods delivered under the contract and treat it as repudiated.” This means that the buyer can claim compensation for any damage or loss that may have been incurred by the breach of the seller. Also, if the breach is material, meaning there was an express breach of the contract or any implied breach breach under ss. 13 – 14 of the act, then the goods can be rejected and the contract can be repudiated, meaning there is a denial of the existence of any contract the consumer will not perform their previous contractual obligation.
S.15B (2) also says that when ‘a contract of sale is a consumer contract’ then any term breached, express or implied, will be seen as material. As long as the express or implied term that has been breached relates to the fitness for purpose or the quality of goods, the goods consistency with their description and if a sample has been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

      Company A’s Defense: Impracticability and rights to delegate Company A is responsible for the poor workmanship of Company B BREACH OF CONTRACT  Tom’ Offer???  Assessing Tom’s position  Determining Breach Of Contract  Harry’s Legal…

    • 1103 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became the basis of the bargain because she purchased the boat because of it. Sandra can therefore, bring a breach of express warranty, An Implied warranty of merchantability of goods is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind. In order for the goods to be merchantable they must be fit for the ordinary purposes of which such goods are used. The implied warranty of merchantability applies to a seller of used goods as well but the warranty is not as expansive because it is used.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 11 Business law

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Signal won’t necessarily succeed on his claims. “Acceptance of the goods prevents the buyer or lessee from exercising the right of rejection, but it does not necessarily prevent the buyer or lessee from pursuing other remedies” (Business Law Today; page 337). In some circumstances, a buyer or lessee are allowed to revoke their acceptance of the goods. The revocation of acceptance is not effective until the seller has been notified. The seller must also be notified within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the grounds for revocation. Tuner noticed cartons with scrape marks and right away questioned Signal, but Signal assured they would not be damaged. A couple days later Tuner’s stocker opens some cartons and then discovers the damages, notifying Signal. Two days later is within a reasonable time. Therefore Tuner has not breached for accepting the goods. He could now keep the goods and recover damages caused by…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In week four’s theory practice, we reviewed the case scenario of Big Time Toymaker vs Chou in regards to determining the validity of a contract. As we’ve reviewed, an agreement or mutual assent is of course essential to a valid contract but the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts. If his words and acts, judged by a reasonable standard, manifest an intention to agree, it is immaterial what may be the real but unexpressed state of his mind (Melvin, 2010).…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Purchaser's exclusive remedy and the Seller's limit of liability for any and all losses or damages resulting from defective goods or from any other cause will be for the purchase price of the particular delivery with respect to which losses or damages are claimed, plus any transportation charges actually paid by the Purchaser.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    D2 Unit 21 2

    • 3044 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Statutory protection given to a consumer in their dealings with a business and the remedies available (D2)…

    • 3044 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following paper will examine an article detailing the definition intellectual property. Additionally, it will make example of the laws that govern and protect the creation and use of intellectual property.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 14 P6

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    All consequences of the breach of the condition are deemed to be sufficiently serious to justify termination. The buyer cannot terminate the contract if the non-conformity is a minor defect and slight breach. Slight breach is treated as a breach of warranty in the business sales contract. Slight breach is the breach when the conse-quences of breach do not go to the root of the contract or detriment the purpose of the contract. If the buyer accepts the goods there is no right of termination because termi-nation remedy required…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 21 P1

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (For D1, a justified conclusion needs to be reached, on how well the business protects its self from things like non payment or failure of delivery. You should also look at how adequately the buyer is protected from issues such as poor quality or late delivery.)…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) Is Bright entitled to specific performance because of the unique nature of the goods?…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Customer has bought an item from catalogue or internet. But when it arrives He is not happy with the quality of the item. Because he can not find returns procedure, he needs to contact the store.…

    • 2823 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question 1 Peng & Lau, a firm of accountants, recently purchased a laptop computer from computer retailer Ace Computers Ltd for $5,000. The laptop was acquired for use by the auditing staff of Peng & Lau during the times when they are working at the premises of clients of the firm. A term of the contract between Peng & Lau and Ace Computers provides that the liability of Ace Computers in relation to any defective computer is restricted to the cost of repairing the relevant defect(s). Soon after the laptop is acquired, it is discovered that, because of faulty wiring, users of the laptop receive an electric shock if they use the laptop while the batteries of the laptop are being recharged. One consequence of this problem with the laptop is that Peng & Lau lose the opportunity to tender for a highly profitable audit job in relation to a new client. What legal rights (if any) do Peng & Lau have against Ace Computers Ltd?…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Products Liability

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Explain the importance of MacPherson and Henningsen in the development of law of products liability.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LAW416

    • 367 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Answer FOUR (4) questions in the Answer Booklet. Start each answer on a new page.…

    • 367 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A seller can resell the goods and recover the difference between the contract price and resale price (and incidental damages, less expenses saved). §2-706.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays