Preview

Why Is Personal Identity Important in Locke's View? Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Personal Identity Important in Locke's View? Essay Example
In his essay Of Identity and Diversity, Locke talks about the importance of personal identity. The title of his essay gives an idea of his view. Identity, according to Locke, is the memory and self consciousness, and diversity is the faculty to transfer memories across bodies and souls. In order to make his point more understandable, Locke defines man and person. Locke identifies a man as an animal of a certain form and a person as a thinking intelligent being. Furthermore, to Locke, a person has reasons and reflections and can consider itself as being itself in different times and places; and he/she does it with his/her consciousness (429). Basically, personal self is a particular body and personal identity is consciousness. In this essay, one will only focus on personal identity since it is the one that is most important to Locke. First, one will discuss the reasons why personal identity is important to Locke. Then, one will highlight the strengths of he's position; in addition to that, one will draw attention to the weaknesses and limits of Locke's view to show that his theory about memory being the only element of personal identity is not that strong.
Personal identity is the unity of consciousness and the unity of consciousness defines the person. Locke says "personal identity, the identity of the self overtime, depends on one's recalling of past experience and actions as one's own" (428). So if one remembers one's past memories, one is the same person. However, if one does not remember, one is the same man but a different person. In this case, the 85 years hold man (John Doe) does not remember the war crimes he committed when he was 20 years old, Locke would say that John is a different person now since he lost his memory; however, he is the same man. One of the reasons why personal identity is important to Locke is that he is concerned about the past and the future. He clearly states that all rights and justice of punishment and reward are founded in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is very difficult to attribute characteristics to a mind when we know it does not actually exist in the physical realm. Though, personal identity has been connected to the mind. However, it is tricky to determine what exactly comprises one’s personal identity. Although it is a difficult concept to grasp, philosophers such as Nagel and Chisholm attempt to construct their own position on the characteristics of the mind. By comparing Nagel and Chisholm’s positions on personal identity, it is evident that identity is a development of both body and mind. Nagel shows that we cannot properly identify a mind, and if this is the case then it is impossible to attribute personal identity to a mind. In turn, he attacks the idea that personal identity can be defined in terms of physical attributes. Chisholm shows that although things are constantly changing, they still remain the same. He argues that it is the mind that holds our identity, regardless of physical alteration. In my view, the physicalist perspective of identity is the most logical when contrasted to the mentalist argument simply due to the fact that we do have a self-identity, and Nagel does not attempt to define what it is. Locke’s argument finds a middle ground between Nagel and Chisholm as he argues for a conscious and bodily continuity of the mind.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The view of interest here holds to the objection that personal identity is anything but ubiquitous, but rather the set of characteristics in question form a personality, which a person merely possesses as a holding, a constitutive of personal consciousness. On this view, a person can change their personality without having their identity annihilated in the strict sense implied by Hume, because one’s personality as well as the personality traits is constitutive of personal identity. Based on how this idea has been refined in recent paragraphs, I propose we rename it personality as a constitutive of personal identity or personality as a constitutive for short. The basis for personality as a constitutive has been that personal identity as a static…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was a political figure and well known for his studies in medicine. Locke also was well educated in medicine. He was a key advocate of the observed approaches of the Scientific Revolution. During his final years John Locke wrote and published all of his most significant works. One of them was his “Essay Concerning Human Understanding” in which he advanced a theory of the self as a blank page, with knowledge and identity arising only from accumulated experiences. Locke made a perfect example: “Rejecting the divine right of kings, that societies form governments by mutual (and, in later generations, tacit) agreement. Thus, when a king loses the consent of the governed, a society may remove him—an approach quoted almost verbatim in Thomas Jefferson’s 1776 Declaration of Independence.” In the end Locke came up with a final answer from all of his studies that explained his work. Locke said “A child is a blank slate that is formed through experience.”2…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The accounts for personal identity, thought up by John Locke, were skeptical for several philosophers throughout time. Locke believes that we are the same person as we were yesterday because of our personal identity. He says that our personal identity is founded on consciousness namely, a continuity of conscious memories, but that the substance of the soul or body does not affect our personal identity. First, I will discuss what Locke believes to be a person. Second, I will explain why Locke believes personal identity has to be a continuous consciousness throughout time. Third, I will asses Thomas Reid's objection to Locke's account on personal identity and explain why I believe Reid's account is stronger.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have said that the basic concept of individual identity has come from the Renaissance time. The two documents B and D are the most significant to the development of the current worldviews about individual identity. Documents B and D display the topics on literature and anatomy. The Renaissance view of individual identity still affects us today because now our knowledge about certain areas of work are more in depth. We are also able to make more discoveries thanks to early realizations.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He agrees that identity is a bundle of memories or perceptions; meaning that they all interconnect; or that these perceptions “succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement” (2). It is hard to maintain and to say that one is exactly in that personality forever because he is always changing…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke defines a person as a ‘thinking, intelligent being, that has reason and reflection and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing, in different times and places’ (Locke, 1689, p 1-6). This statement suggests that, in order to persist as the same person, we must have a mental consciousness which persists through time. We can say that a person is psychologically continuous if they have a mental state that is descendent from their previous mental states. For example, this theory states that a five-year-old will be the same person when they are a 25-year-old, because their mental state in later years is descendent from their earlier years.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an effort to reimagine politics and diverge from the fanciful teachings of the ancients, three optimistic realists emerged to begin a philosophical revolution. The garden of modern politics was begun by Machiavelli who cleared the land of the stones of antiquated virtue and tilled the soil. Then came Hobbes, who added the fertilizer of enlightened self-interest, the water of reason, and the seeds of human nature. Finally came Locke who, upon seeing that Hobbes’ seeds had grown into weeds of despotic monarchy, ripped them from the ground and replaced them with the seeds of liberalism. What Locke viewed as weeds, Hobbes viewed as the form of government most conducive to stability and peace. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government provides an argument against absolute hereditary monarchies while exalting liberalism as the paradigm of politics.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Rousseau, the original condition of mankind was a peaceful and quixotic time in which people lived solitary, uncomplicated lives. This differs from Locke's concept of the state of nature in that, his natural condition of mankind was a state liberty in which one was able to conduct one's life as they saw fit. Like Rousseau's, it was a time of peace between the people, but Locke's was not necessarily a solitary life.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind Body Debate

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Chapter 7, Personal Identity, Eric Olson approaches identity of a person by asking many questions to find out what makes a person who they are. He takes a different approach from other philosophers but his main point is that a person’s identity is biological not psychological. He asks many questions, one of which is, what makes us human? He states by being a biological organism we escape the psychological approach which makes us human and not animal. Olson argues no psychological relation is sufficient for a person to persist. He discusses personhood and persistence and disagrees with several well known thought experiments dealing…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal Identity Essay

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Identity is something human beings hold dear. Humans are very complex beings and it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what makes up who a person is or can be. Now, the most common generalizations as to what makes up an identity are: personality, likes, dislikes, experience(s), religion, soul, memories and beliefs. A physical form isn’t mentioned; because the body is a temporary thing. A body doesn’t necessarily mean that it is part of the identity since; what will last forever in not the body but the impact left by personality or ideas, for they are everlasting.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Second Treatise of Government by John Locke, he writes about the right to private property. In the chapter which is titled "Of Property" he tells how the right to private property originated, the role it plays in the state of nature, the limitations that are set on the rights of private property, the role the invention of money played in property rights and the role property rights play after the establishment of government.. In this chapter Locke makes significant points about private property. In this paper I will summarize his analysis of the right to private property, and I will give my opinion on some of the points Locke makes in his book. According to Locke, the right to private property originated when God gave the world to men. Locke makes the argument that when God created the world for man, he gave man reason to make use of the world to the best advantage of life, and convenience. What he means by that is, that God made this world for man, and when he made it he gave man the right to use what is in this world to his benefit. Locke explains that every man has property in his own person, and that nobody has any right to that property but that person. The author states that "whatsoever then he removes out of the state of nature hath provided, and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property (Locke pg. 19)". What Locke means by that statement is that once a person removes something out of its original state of nature that something becomes that persons property. After someone gains this property are there any limitations on that property? Locke believes that there are limitations on that property. Locke believes that God has given us all things richly, and that man may use those things as long as he takes what he needs. Men can have property as long as they obtained it rightfully, and as long as they use discretion. If those limitations were overlooked when the person was…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke influenced Thomas Jefferson and our Founding Fathers while writing “the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, Locke’s Social Contract Theory on America’s political and governmental system is undeniable” (Moll, 2006).…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is equality? Equality is not something that a government can grant or deny a body of citizens; for this right is unalienable. This basically included life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and was not allowed to be taken away by governments. It could be utilized to describe the same political rights that people may have, including males and females. However, John Locke in the Second Treatise of Government outlines his theory of equality and how it works in his political society, known as the common-wealth.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke in his essay "Concerning Human Understanding" begins with his explanation of ideas, and spends a decent amount of time here. Locke is concerned with ideas in two ways; simple and complex. From here he extrapolates, and makes his argument against innate ideas and for a tabula rasa, or blank slate, idea of human understanding. His arguments also address several other philosophers' papers and the errors he sees in them, most notably Spinoza and Descartes. However, Locke's argument against innate ideas falters a bit due to inner contradictions; specifically, when he addresses the idea of the blank slate and pre-experiences in the womb.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays