After the September 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center Towers, the United States government reacted quickly in order to increase the aviation safeties at the local airports (Robert W. Poole, 2012). Congress designed the Transport Security Administration (TSA) in November 2001 (Chris Edwards, 2013) with the main purpose of protecting the nation’s transportation system acting as an efficient and effective counterterrorist organization through screening of passengers at the airports (TSA, 2001). However, due to some problems and monopoly on behalf of the TSA, some airports such as San Francisco International Airport (SFO) were demanding and were granted a private airport security screening contract from…
Millions of people fly annually. Almost everyone has or will travel by plane in his lifetime whether he is traveling for the holidays, visiting family, or important business trips. This must mean that they must have been at an airport, and if they have been to an airport, that means they have shared the experience of airport scanners. After 9/11, security measures have been increased which seems to have led to racial profiling. The major frustrations for many Americans are the Airport Security Scanners. Scanners were created since 1992 when Dr. Steven Smith first created them. Their primary purpose is to detect anyone who is trying to smuggle any harmful object or substance that could be used as a weapon onto a plane. Some welcome the machines as protection and others see as the same threat the scanners try to pick up. It now bubbles down to the question “Should scanners or pat-downs be required to go through if one wants to travel by plane?”…
Travelers must check in at least two hours before their flight takes off, and family can no longer walk with you to the gate; only ticketed passengers go through security. There are restrictions on what travelers can bring, which can be an inconvenience. Liquids and toiletries have to be a certain size and placed in clear, sealed bags if placed in carry-on bags. Drinks are not allowed through security; if you want to bring a drink on the plane, it must be purchased once you cross through security. We must remove our shoes, belts and empty pockets. Full body airport scanners, which has received complaints of not being safe, are now used as they can detect much more than metal objects. Many government buildings and schools have since installed security devices and scanners to enhance protection. The assumption that we are safe is gone; we must be proactive and be…
Since airplanes became the weapon of choice for the terrorists, there is now more airport security. Responsibility for airport security screening after 9/11 was handed over to the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Passengers since then have been subjected to much more vigorous screening procedures. “Some security measures require passengers to remove their shoes and jackets before walking through x-ray machines” (Delgadillo). These new procedures allow for TSA workers to screen passengers in a more detailed way, to find out what exactly a person is carrying with them…
A large effect from 9/11 was an increase in the security aspects when it relates to aviation, when at the time America was fairly lackluster. There were many things you were able to do and get away with, that are completely unheard of nowadays. Then after this incident was a kick in the face for us here in America especially for us to make leaps in bounds when it comes to security. ”America’s involvement in the War on Terror — prompted…
The good thing about having information and security from terrorist is that it keeps us safe and prevents tragedies like the one that happened on September 11th. The bad thing is that I’ve been hearing in the news that a lot of people are not comfortable with the pat down in airports because people feel violated. The screening that they do makes the public feel uncomfortable because their private areas are shown. I necessarily don’t care if they see me naked because I have nothing to hide and I want to get on a plane safe and I hope everyone else has a safe flight. I’m ok with armed air martial’s being on the plane too, you can never be too…
Thomas Frank’s article presents a theme that receives a controversial nature. Based on my understanding backscatter x-rays are more honest than normal scenarios and reduce the danger of exposure to radiation. I believe this call made by Frank Cerra is a lawful reason to permit the use of backscatter x-ray machines. On the other hand, the issue of privacy invasion does not convince me as a strong enough reason, why? Because the privacy advocates sound like the great unwashed who are straining to create a problem that is not in that location. The TSA said the images are cart onlike in nature, uses outlines of a person’s body and erases details within highlighted areas. I would prefer a machine that has a one in a thousand chance of discovering a person’s physical structure and can detect threats than metal scanners. It is worth noting that Thomas Frank does not demand as a side; he covers all the opposing views fairly.…
Flying in planes is regulated by the government to keep people safe and protected, they have the detectors to see if there are any unsafe prohibited items being carried on board, and they also have security to make sure everything goes well in the airport. The negatives of this are that going to the airport takes forever, but I guess if it's for safety than you can't really complain.…
“TSA says the scanners add another layer of security at checkpoints besides metal detectors, explosives-detection systems and bomb-sniffing dogs” (Jansen). What that is saying is that the scanners check for things that metal detectors, explosive-detection systems and bomb-sniffing dogs might not be able to find. “The threats the machines could have detected include the shoe bomb Richard Reid attempted to detonate, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s underwear bomb, and two non-metallic explosives in Yemen printer cartridges” (Jansen). Full body scans are just another way to ensure the safety of others.…
We need to remember that the government has advanced the security of our nation for the safety of its citizens. Airports have had one of the largest changes to their security. Before 9-11 the only security was a metal detector.“Due to events that have occurred such as the terrorist who attempted to blow up an airliner with explosive chemicals in his underwear” (How Has National Security Changed Since). We as America have changed the security. Now when you go into an airport you are scanned patted down and your luggage is searched. The changes that have been made to our national security have helped to protect the lives of innocent people of the United…
Although the United States has improved security to protect all people from various situations, there are many people who disagree with these changes. These people say that security checks are taking away their freedoms as Americans. Organizations such as We Won’t Fly say that body scanners and other forms of airport checks are intrusive, humiliating, take too much time, and that the high budget is unnecessary. (We Won’t Fly)…
Individual Privacy vs. National Security is something that many people have argued for years. Many people have forgotten what a disturbance September 11, 2001 was to everyone in America. This was the day that 2,992 lives were stolen in the attacks by the Taliban on U.S. soil. Due to this attack the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) along with the Federal Government has put in place many new security regulations. Many people have lost touch with why these regulations were put in place. As well, many people have lost touch with why TSA is using full body scanners and other security devices.…
a. The TSA is planning to eventually replace all magnetometers (that detect metal at airports) with full-body x-ray scan machines. The issue of privacy has been raised by passengers who were opposed to having their x-ray body images appear on screen as naked. Other objections include questions over the possibility of the machine’ capability to record and store images, as well as questions over the safety of being exposed to the machines’ radiation. Individuals are free to opt out of the full-body x-ray scan.…
The aftermath of the 9/11 in 2001, has left the United States of America in frenzy. It is this particular event that has been devastating to our nation and unforgettable. Furthermore, stressing the importance of the safety and health of the general public. September 11, has caused federal and state governments to merge public health and public safety into one. This merger brought about the significance of public health preparedness. In other words, this merger created ways in which we can protect the country against future terrorist attacks and the precautions that we must now take to ensure that our nation and its people are protected (Annas, 2012). The United States Supreme Court now upholds the merger. But where problems begin is in the area of routine strip searches of those who are arrested (even those who commit a minor crime such as, not wearing a seat belt) before being confined to either jail or prison. The U.S. Supreme court had to determine whether or not these routine strip searches were a violation of the Fourth Amendment. According to Walenta (2010), the Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (para 1, pg. 1). In other words, this prohibits those in positions of authority to conduct strip searches on individuals without probable cause. Hence, the term “unreasonable” searches. Public health as well as medical professionals and staff should be informed of how. This writer will further discuss the findings in Annas’s article in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Strip Searches in the Supreme Court –Prisons and Public…
“X-ray Tests both Security, Privacy”, is an essay that was written on December 27, 2006 by a correspondent for USA Today. This USA correspondent goes by the name of Thomas Frank as mentioned above. It is important to know when this essay was written in case there is a change in information or an update within the system that wasn’t mentioned with the essay in case you are using the information as a source. For example, if I was to write and academic paper and use information from another source other than myself, I would have to give that person the correct citation, but the respect for referencing their material. It is also important to know when the essay was written for reference purpose in case any information has to be cited.…