After I read the poem, I think why do I follow people’s mind to live. It's always about owning our own lives, being responsible for who we are through the choices we make.…
The poem tells the story of a young black girl exploring and experiencing what it is to become a black woman in her changing social circle. “it’s dropping food coloring in your eyes to make them blue and suffering their burn in silence. It’s popping a bleached white mophead over the kinks of your hair and primping in front of the mirrors that deny your reflection.” (Smith,9) The food coloring in her eyes, and the bleaching of her hair can only symbolize her need to grow into the more “accepted” form of society, the white skinned, blue eyed, blonde haired men…
The poem itself is discussing a man's journey from birth to death and how all around him life is interpreted by material possessions. At the beginning of the first stanza, the sentences have been made very short and simple, as if to demonstrate the thoughts of a new born child. The first voice that the baby hears when he is born is Bobby Dazzler, one of Australia's first game shows. The very first thing that the baby hears is not the voice of his mother, nor the voice of his father, but the voice of materialism. This first stanza instantly creates the feeling of a home in the 1950s, where television was something new. The ellipsis that connects the first and second stanzas demonstrates a change in time, in this case, a change of a couple of years.…
The speaker of this poem is going through an identity crisis. They are dull and don’t see themselves having a personality. They see women in beautiful saris in the beginning of the poem and revel in how exotic and interesting they are or appear to be. Simultaneously they are conscious of their own bland way of life…
While this line could simply be about the beauty of the plain midnight sky or it could be about the beauty of Black people. The tone of this poem seems to be one of resentment and fury. Although the speaker doesn't use harsh words, it seems like he is fed up with a situation and is telling the audience to realize that something is wrong as well. Through my reading of this poem, I conclude that its intended audience was Black people who accepted things the way they were. I'm not really sure as to what the situation of this poem is, but I think the author's feelings toward it could be that he wants the audience to see things for the way that they were, reject them, and stand up for themselves.…
The speaker in the poem is currently at a crossroads in life where there is opportunity to act upon their ambitions. Yet before they can make a change there is an “old tug at your [their] ankles” forcing other people’s “bad advice” into their conscious (8-9). The “bad advice” coming to life and grasping the speaker physically creates an emphasis in the emotional impact a decision can have on a person. By personifying the advice, attention is being drawn to the obligation to conform to the general consensus or opinion of peers. Throughout the poem there is a conflict between following heart or society but the speaker suggests that the audience in the end is only “determined to save the only life you [they] could” (lines 35-36). Indirectly proposing an idea to infer that the only guaranteed life a person can save is their own connects to the ethos appeal. The audience can identify with this claim and take it in their own perspective to connect with personal experiences. This paints a bigger picture because by one saving them it shows priorities and valuing your own life over others. By choosing to help yourself, one becomes more self aware, kind and resourceful to others who are also figure out where they are going in their journey. [closing…
The shift in images from the beginning to the ending of the poem served as a useful example in showing me how to switch the tone of a poem with grace (I was thinking about my condom poem in this instance) and how to structure lines and words in a way that make the reader think. All in all, Brewington hits the nail on the head with this poem by delivering a prepossessing story of life, death, and all the odd portions…
She only has her “white” dress, and is unable to do anything at all to change the world outside her walls. The beauty in the poem is that it is only 4 lines, but it message speaks volumes. I love this poem, because she conveyed so much without really being specific. Leaving the audience drawing conclusions and possibly inspiring…
One reason why, is because, in the beginning of the poem, it starts off by giving negative messages. Once you read it backwards it gives you strong positive messages. In my opinion, I believe that this poem gives you the idea that a part of the world is crooked and bad, while another part of the world has a lot of good and happiness. Although, many people disagree and have only seen the bad in the world, this does not mean that bad could not turn good. Today, our generation has many different types of people:Quiet, angry, unhappy and finally happy people. Seeing different personalities although sounds a little bit crazy, helps make us who we are and allows us to know who and where we belong. This poem is also showing that if we did what it said backwards, we would be happier and do better in life. My favorite part about the poem was how it explains that if we switch any negative things from life back to good, it would allow us to have an effect on the world allowing us to possibly be able to change somebody's life for the better. Lastly, I believe that this poem can help other people change positively and see the world…
Many people would have made chosen to take the path that has been taken more often, knowing they will be safe and their deeds will go unnoticed. I would have taken the path less traveled by too, but not everyone makes the same choices. This is why there are both bad and good people in the world. Hopefully someday the good will weigh out the bad and all will be equal. The author used poetic devices to make the poem seem more real. Even though choices are already real. In the first line the poet gave am example of assonance. “Two roads diverged in a yellow wood.” The ‘O’ sound is repeated in “roads” and “yellow.” He also gave an example of personification. In the eighth line the text states, “Because it was grassy and wanted wear.” He gave a human characteristic to a non-living thing. He was saying the path wanted wear but only living things like humans, animals and plants can want. The poem as a whole could be considered a metaphor. The poet was comparing the paths in life to the choices one must make. This poem speaks of the actual choices in one’s life, as roads one must choose to take. The roads represent your choices in…
Although this poem had no personal effect on me, it caught my imagination through the imagery. The delusion of the teacher's town, Schoolsville, filled with all of their old students, is made almost real by the descriptions of the population. "The boy who always had his hand up" I swear was in my English class last year, and I have always been jealous of "the A's." You would find me in the circle of creative writing students, sitting near whoever plays the lute, pulling at the grass and conversing about that new Sylvia Plath poem I ran across the other night in my grandpa's old college notes.…
These grotesque descriptions could refer to the negative elements of the natural world, as later in the poem it makes the prenatal being’s need for the “pure” aspects of nature apparent. If this is so, its wish to be protected from the harsher points of the environment coincides with natural instincts, as the human race has strived for its own protection since the beginning. But, in the next verse it speaks of how the search of complete protection of individual lives against nature, the human race may construct societies that crush individual freedoms. The being seems to be wishing to be able to have complete sanctuary without its liberty becoming stifled. This utopia is unfeasible because a balance must be struck between the two positive factors, since if a life were to be shielded from all danger its freedom and options would be greatly diminished. The being disregards this, and demands a paradox for itself.…
The most visually noticeable part of this poem is the format. It isn’t written in familiar stanzas with any kind of meter or complex organization, but is simply a paragraph. The poem reads like the average disclaimer on the side of the television or amusement park ride. It reads first “We are not responsible for your lost or stolen relatives.” (Line 1). Countless other disclaimers have taught people to expect the phrase to end “lost or stolen items,” but this line reads relatives. The unexpected causes the reader to think beyond the surface and past what is obvious. The poem leaves it open as to why the victims are losing relatives, where they may be going, what happened to them, and how they can get them back. It’s a mystery that is left unsolved and is open for interpretation.…
The poem discusses the funeral of a woman and how she is presented in her funeral as someone people would be more likely to romanticize than what she actually was, perhaps out of a misguided sign of respect. The other more hidden meaning behind the poem is the author's reaction to the women herself and how she is portrayed in almost a spiteful, angry way because of his anger over her wasting her life in gray dullness.…
In the beginning of the poem, the speaker explains the differences between humans’ life and animals’ life. He thinks animals do not have consciousness, so they do not need to think and act humanely. In his view, animals which are “so placid and self-contain’d” never get frustrated with their life, while he is now mad at his own life. He thinks humans’ life is much more troublesome than that of the animals. In the second stanza, he lists some negative aspects of the humans’ life when compared with an animals’ life. Humans usually “sweat and whine” about their living conditions. They commit sins and can’t sleep at night because of their guilt. They have desires and passions which sometimes make them “dissatisfied.” They also have to show their respect to other people. However, animals’ never have to do those things, because they do not have thoughts about them. The speaker uses comparisons to clearly reveal the differences in those two worlds. He seems to be tired of living in this society, where he…