Issues: 1. SALN 2. Which of the two court is superior in the impeachment case the Supreme Court or the Impeachment Court 3. Cold Neutrality of Impartial Judges Facts: First and foremost regarding the SALN of Chief Justice Corona the prosecution claims that CJ Corona has 45 properties. However they were able to present only 21 properties which in his account named after him and his family. According to a key member of the President Aquino’s Cabinet the government
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Chief Justice of the United States United States Congress
Pike v. Aurora The issue at hand in this case is whether or not the town ordinance is constitutional. To determine this‚ there are a number of questions that must be asked and laws that must be examined. The first step in determining the constitutionality is knowing and understanding the enumerated powers given to congress under the constitution. Enumerated powers are specific powers listed in the constitution that congress can exercise. If a power is not specifically listed in the constitution
Premium United States Congress United States Constitution Commerce Clause
called to enforce the Supreme Court Decision Brown V. Board of Education. The governor of Arkansas in 1957 decided to challenge the right of the court by preventing students from integrating the schools in Little Rock Arkansas‚ Eisenhower had been silent on the issue up to this point‚ could no longer remain so and decided to act. The president federalized the Arkansas national guard and enforced the Supreme Court decision. Eisenhower did not agree with the decision of the court but felt that his constitutional
Premium United States American Civil War President of the United States
W Marbury v Madison 1803 will forever and always be a Supreme Court Case that will live infamously in today’s history. During the election of 1800 against incumbent president John Adams of the Federalist Party versus the Anti-Federalist Party nominee Thomas Jefferson‚ with Jefferson being the victor. Before Adams were to leave the presidential office‚ he made what is called “midnight appointments” of new judgeships to counter act the Jeffersonians once in office. John Marshall‚ who was secretary
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
In 1976‚ the California Supreme Court ruled that psychotherapists have a duty to warn and protect potential victims if their patients made threats or otherwise behaved as if they presented a serious danger of violence to another. This ruling happened because of the Tarasoff Case of 1969‚ in which the court determined the need for therapists to protect the public was more important than protecting patient-therapist confidentiality. (Vitelli 1) The Tarasoff Case is based on the 1969 murder of a University
Premium Marriage Love Emotion
a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train‚ and refused to move to the car for blacks and was then arrested. The Court had to decide whether the Louisiana law was unconstitutional under the 14th amendment. The Court ruled that the state law was within its constitutional boundaries. The majority of this case supported the state-imposed racial segregation. The Court based their final decision on the separate but equal doctrine and agreed that the state had separate facilities for blacks and whites‚ which
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education
minor receiving the death penalty it gets even more interesting. The Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons was a perfect example of that. Roper v. Simmons presented the Supreme Court with two questions: 1) whether or not the execution of those who were sixteen or seventeen at the time of a crime is cruel and unusual punished and 2) does is violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. The main audience for this particular case is the general American population‚ and specifically affects the juvenile
Premium Roper v. Simmons Capital punishment Supreme Court of the United States
multiple legal victories‚ consisting of decisions ruling against racial segregation and discrimination. Led by Chief Justice Earl Warren during the Civil Rights Movement‚ the Supreme Court embodied the idea of legal liberalism‚ using the law to achieve political ends. During this era‚ the Court used the civil rights cases brought to them to achieve social change and promote equality. The decision in Loving v. Virginia is one example illustrating the Supreme Court using its power to attain racial equality
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
destroying over thirty thousand documents before being subpoenaed by the SEC‚ predictably hindering the investigation. During May of 2002‚ Arthur Andersen LLP was finally indicted on charges of obstruction of justice by the Southern Texas District Court‚ served by Michael Chertoff. The jury believed that Arthur Andersen and its employees were in violation of 18 US Code § 1512‚ a public law which covers “tampering with a witness‚ victim‚ or an informant”5‚ due to the mass destruction of documents in
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States
Case: Near v. Minnesota 1931 U.S. Supreme Court Parties Jay Near (Plaintiff) State of Minnesota (Defendant) Facts: A publication‚ The Saturday Press‚ published an article alleging that City officials of Minneapolis were complaisant with gangsters who were engaged in illegal activities in the city. A Minnesota law was in effect which allowed the state courts to enjoin a publication which was engaged in a public nuisance. To be a nuisance the publisher had to be printing material that was malicious
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution