Perry w. James April 8‚ 2010 The Dangers of Groupthink Question 1 – One factor was that there appeared to be group unanimity in the new steps with the mail delivery system and appeared to be a consensus. The civilian worker was horrified with the process but lacked the confidence to speak up. Also‚ group members seemed to rationalize that the assumptions made were good because they had the majority. I think in the future after the teams have discussed the issues‚ they can take a discreet
Premium Psychology Debut albums
terrible decision? You may have been part of a groupthink event. Groupthink is a term coined by Psychologist Irving Janis. He determined cohesive groups try to maintain unanimity rather than utilize all data to make a good decision (Whyte‚ 2000). Some historic examples of groupthink are the attack on Pearl Harbor‚ Iranian hostage rescue attempt‚ and the Holocaust. The attack on Pearl Harbor may have been thwarted‚ or damage minimized‚ if groupthink was not present. Ambassador Grew sent a warning
Premium United States World War II Franklin D. Roosevelt
GROUPTHINK THEORY Groupthink is a concurrence-seeking tendency that can deter collective decision-making processes and lead to poor decisions that induce fiascos‚ (Janis‚ 1972‚ 1982). Janis (1972) defined groupthink as "a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group‚ when the members’ strivings for agreement override their motivation to realistically review alternative courses of action. Janis listed eight symptoms of group think: Illusions of invulnerability
Premium Diffusion of innovations Decision making Group dynamics
Q 2.What is groupthink. Explain Groupthink occurs when the pressure to conform within a group interferes with that group’s analysis of a problem and causes poor group decision making. Individual creativity‚ uniqueness‚ and independent thinking are lost in the pursuit of group cohesiveness‚ as are the advantages that can sometimes be obtained by making a decision as a group—bringing different sources of ideas‚ knowledge‚ and experience together to solve a problem. Psychologist Irving Janis defines
Premium Dispute resolution Negotiation Mediation
Quotes Quote #1 page 72: “3rd Juror: … that goddamn rotten kid. I know him. What they’re like. What they do to you. How they kill you every day. My god‚ don’t you see? How come I’m the only one who sees? Jeez‚ I can feel that knife goin’ in. 8th Juror: it’s not your boy. He’s somebody else. 4th Juror: let him live. [There’s a long pause.] 3rd Juror: All right. Not guilty” This is memorable to me because when the 3rd juror was talking I realized that his anger was coming from problems at
Premium Jury Boy Not proven
Twelve Angry Men – Essay 1 “Twelve Angry Men” asserts that justice is far more important than truth. Do you agree? In Reginald Rose’s gripping play‚ “Twelve Angry Men” the assumption that justice is more important than the truth is explored. The play illustrates the necessity to eliminate all preconceived ideas when deciding a verdict based on the standard of proof‚ ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. Antagonists‚ jurors 3 and 10 find it almost impossible to administer justice fairly
Premium Jury Not proven 12 Angry Men
Twelve Angry Men “Reasonable Doubt” Theme The play‚ “Twelve Angry Men” is of how there could’ve been flaws in the Judicial system; however one juror tries to prove that the man isn’t guilty and persuades the others to follow his reasoning. One of the many themes is reasonable doubt‚ meaning a doubt of the guilt in a criminal due to lack of evidence or thorough examination. Reginald Rose feels that reasonable doubt is often portrayed in many real life juries partly because of testimonies‚ lawyers
Premium Law Jury Judge
Kevin Faucher & Joel Lai Mr. Gordon CLU3M1 April 25‚ 2013 12 Angry Men In the film Twelve Angry Men‚ all jury members discussed the evidence of a boy’s murder trial. It seems as though it should be an easy‚ unanimous vote for guilty however after hours of analyzing and discussing the evidence it comes down to the most powerful evidence; the eye witnesses. How reliable really were the eye witnesses to the boy’s murder? The most convincing testimonies do not always add up as proven by this
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Superficially the ideas promoted through groupthink often result in decisions appearing well founded and heavily supported‚ however the outcomes of such decisions are most frequently detrimental. Factors of cognitive dissonance are quite often evident in members of groupthink decisions‚ with individuals finding in reflection that they generally possessed ideas starkly contrasting the concepts which they just publically supported. Such incongruity in beliefs and decisions according to Hackman and
Premium Psychology Management Leadership
Surprises Found in Studying Groupthink There are many things that groups of people are capable of that might be surprising to someone who has not studied the theory. As there have been more tests throughout the theories history‚ scientist have found fascinating results. The first interesting discovery made while studying groupthink is‚ “Group deliberation often produces worse decisions than can be obtained without deliberation. (Often enough for epistemic concern.)” (Solomon‚ 2006). Despite most
Premium Social psychology Creativity The Work