Consequences: A Student Refutation of Utilitarianism Erik Z. Hallworth San Francisco State University Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory holding that moral actions are based on the maximization of overall happiness‚ defined as the Utility Principle. Mill and Bentham ’s utilitarianism makes a plausible and convincing argument‚ though not everyone agrees with it. Bernard Williams writes Utilitarianism: For and Against the theory. In agreement with Williams
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics John Stuart Mill
conflict between Antigone and Creon throughout the play‚ both of them having their own ideas and opinions regarding divine law versus human law. The theme that I am going to analyze is the conflict of divine law vs. human law. The reason for this is because this theme seems to control the whole play. It is an issue of which law is the "right" law‚ and if Creon’s and Antigone’s acts were justifiable.<br><br>The play Antigone can be summarized by the following: King Creon lets it be known that Polyneices
Premium Sophocles Law Oedipus
Cambridge University Press‚ 1993. Singh‚ Janak. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Messiah of the Downtrodden. Delhi: Kalpaz Publications‚ 2010. Sinha‚ N. N. “Isn’t Caste System Outdated?” Social Welfare 31‚ 4 (July 1984)‚ 15-16. Sloane‚ Andrew. “Singer‚ Preference Utilitarianism and Infanticide.” Studies in Christian Ethics 12‚ 2 (1999)‚ 47-73.
Premium Utilitarianism Sociology Social class
Mill: Utilitarianism‚ Chapters 1-3 In chapter number one titled “General Remarks” Mill starts off by talking about what is to be seen as morally right and morally wrong things‚ yet no one has a complete understanding for what is actually morally right and wrong. He then talks about “Moral Faculty” and two different views or opinions on the subject. Mill states in his text that “Our moral faculty‚ according to all those of its interpreters who are entitled to the name of thinkers‚ supplies us
Premium Morality Ethics Moral absolutism
many different ways‚ but depending on an individual’s ethical code‚ they may or may not be considered good. The three major ethical theories which we addressed are Kantian Ethics‚ Utilitarianism‚ and Virtue Ethics. A strong argument could be made for each theory‚ but one sticks out as the best and most reasonable theory of ethics. Kantian Ethics is the best universal theory of ethics‚ as it allows for individual rights and is specific enough to follow. Kantian ethics stresses individual rights‚ reason
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Decision making
we should not lie to someone even if that means that we may prevent 5 other people from being used as mere means. This is because the categorical imperative is principle-based and not utilitarian. The categorical imperative states that you should “act only on the maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. Lying is bad and can never be universalized because if it were‚ there would be no point in being honest. However this may be used as an objection to Kant
Premium
Paper 2 “How would Aristotle respond to Utilitarianism?” How would Aristotle respond to Utilitarianism? The Definition of “Utilitarianism” is an ethical theory holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes the overall "good" of the greatest number of individuals. It is thus a form of consequentialism‚ meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its resulting outcome. The most influential contributors to this theory are considered to be Jeremy Bentham and
Premium Marketing Management United States
Ethical theories are designed to give reason of how and why life’s principles and moral rules should be applied to everyday life. The two theories of focus in this discussion are: Femininist/Care Ethics and Utilitarianism. We will take a closer look into Feminist/ Care Ethics and find out what it means to say that women and men are equal and what it does not mean. We will also go in depth about the Utilitarianism theory to try and answer the question‚ “Does it make a difference whether a person’s
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
1. Aaron Feuerstein became something of an overnight national hero by protecting his workers. Feuerstein said‚ “It was the right thing to do and there’s a moral imperative to do it‚ irrespective of the consequences.” a. Was Feuerstein employing utilitarian or formalist reasoning? Explain. Aaron Feuerstein engaged in formalist reasoning. I believe this is true because he based his decision on what he felt was morally right and the consequences did not matter to him. He kept to his moral upbringing
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
money for the same amount of work does sound like a good deal. With that said if you increase the wage amount and companies do not have that in their budget‚ it will cause loss of jobs. A Utilitarian would defiantly have an issue with that. “Utilitarianism States that it wants the greatest good for the greatest number of people.” With job loses it would really not help the people out in a way that would be good. A utilitarian would want people to be happy with the change in the amount of wage. That
Premium Utilitarianism Minimum wage Wage