University of Phoenix CJA 354 Criminal Law Criminal Law Paper Iesha Gay Rod Shelton July 7‚ 2013 In this paper I am going to take a look at the case state of Maryland v Alonzo King. I will take a look at what accomplice liability is and criminal liability and how they are related to the case of Maryland v King. How different aspects of crime differ from one another and there direct correlation to this case. In 2009 Alonzo Jay King Jr. was arrested by the Maryland police for first and
Premium Law Crime United States
Inchoate Offenses I believe criminal liability and punishment for inchoate offenses is indeed fair. An inchoate offense is “a criminal act that goes beyond mere thought‚ but occurs before the substantive criminal act is completed” (Wallace & Roberson 2008 p.63). Also called preparatory or incomplete crimes‚ the acts involve the impulse to commit‚ or indirect participation in‚ a criminal offense. It is in society’s best interest to punish crimes that have not been fully carried out. This is so “injuries
Premium Criminal law
legal definition on murder is “The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another” In order for Sawyer to be convicted of Sayid’s murder it needs to be establish that the actus reus (guilty act) was present while the mens rea (guilty mind) and Sayid’s death was a result Sawyer unlawful act. The actus reus of murder is unlawful act which results in death of another human being within the queen’s peace. The mens rea of murder is intention also known as malice aforethought there are two
Premium Murder Law Capital punishment
Criminal Law Paper A country without rules to follow will be peril‚ just imagine how dangerous our communities would be. We would see crime in every corner‚ criminals will be everywhere‚ and people will not have peace. Many people ask what the purpose of law is and why laws are created. Criminal laws "deal with the crime committed against the public by the public and this laws focus on the general public and how they respond or take charges for the offenses they have made" (Criminal Lawyer Group
Premium Criminal law Crime
Firstly‚ one similarity of assault and battery is that they both form the mens rea. For example‚ both intention and recklessness form mens rea. The mens rea of assault is content when the defendant intends to cause the victim to apprehend violence or does it recklessly. This can be found in the case of R v Savage (1991)‚ a woman threw a pint of beer over the victim’s head in a pub. The glass slipped out of her hand‚ smashed and cut the victims wrist. The victim was the defendant’s husband’s ex-girlfriend
Premium Marriage Woman Sexual intercourse
CHAPTER 7 – CRIMINAL LAW 7.1 Introduction The term criminal law‚ sometimes called penal law‚ refers to various rules whose common characteristic is the imposition of punishment if one fails to comply with the rules. In criminal law‚ a crime is considered as a wrong against the State. A crime may be defined as an unlawful act or an omission which is unacceptable that causes public condemnation in a form of sanction. Therefore‚ a crime is a wrong which affects the public welfare‚ a wrong for which
Premium Criminal law
Actus reus is known as conduct‚ which mean a person cannot be charged for thinking a crime‚ they must have committed an actual crime. Mens rea is the mental state of a person‚ which means the crime must have been voluntarily or purposely committed. Finally‚ concurrence means actus reus and mens rea must be committed at the same time. For this particular case none of these elements are relevant
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Law Police
Principles of Criminal Liability 1/16/2013 Student ID: Word Count: 2482 Criminal activities are very common in our society. With the intention to hamper the property of other people or causing ill effect to others‚ criminal activities are occurred usually. Sometimes people involve themselves with some activities to injure others due to personal clash or from ill temperament. Some activities which may be done to cause simple injury
Free Criminal law Manslaughter
referred to as the ‘actus reus’ of a crime. However this alone is insufficient for conviction‚ unless it concerns a crime which is of strict liability‚ like Harrow London BC v. Shah . Alongside the ‘actus reus’ element of a crime there is also a requirement for the accused to have the appropriate state of mind known as the ‘mens rea’. Both ‘actus reus’ and ‘mens rea’ need to be apparent to create criminal liability. Another dimension to criminal liability is that not all ‘actus rei’ require an ‘act’
Premium Criminal law Causality
Supreme Court Case CJA/354 Supreme Court Case The discovery of unethical billing alongside unethical accounting practices provoked a chain reaction towards a hospital accountant by the name of Rehberg. An accountant trying to serve justice was entangled in a web of lies. Rehberg vs. Paulk is a very interesting Supreme Court case. Rehberg vs. Paulk embodied much of the injustice that is not presented to the public when sworn officials break the very laws that are supposed to be
Premium Jury Criminal law Law