Del Monte Foods Company LBO Deal Report 1. Del Monte Foods Company (DLM or ‘the company’) is one of US ’s largest producers‚ distributors and marketers of premium quality‚ branded pet products and food products for the retail market. It is the world’s sixth largest manufacturer of preserved food‚ and the leading producer of both preserved fruit and preserved tomatoes . Its pet products segment includes brands like Meow Mix‚ Kibbles n Bits‚ Milk-Bone‚ 9Lives‚ Pup-Peroni‚ Gravy Train‚ Nature
Premium Stock market Stock Cash flow
Financial Analysis JET2 Task 3 A1. Capital Structure Recommendation A sound capital structure needs to be in place for Competition Bikes to maximize its shareholder return and expand. A good capital structure would ensure adequate funding and future business stability. However‚ adequate funding involves capital financing which also has its own risks. If bonds are issued‚ the company would have to pay interest on them but if sales projections aren’t met‚ this could have a huge negative impact
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Investment
organizations to make their capital budgeting (CB) decisions or the alternative projects can be ranked in line with the benefits arrived in terms of profitability and the revenue generated. (Gitman‚ 2008). Net present value (NPV)‚ internal rate of return (IRR)‚ accounting rate of return (ARR) and PBK are generally described as the most commonly used CBTs. The two former techniques are based on the cash-flow concept and are usually categorized as sophisticated techniques. Bierman & Smidt (1993 cited in Axelsson
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
structure that would make ICL win against other four bidders. Hence‚ in this leveraged buyout‚ there are four main concerns needed to be considered‚ which are; 1. ICL required that bid prices would need to reflect at least 30 percent rate of return or IRR | 2. Deutsche Bank Securities must evaluate whether the deal will be worth the cost for ICL‚ or not | 3. Must make sure that ICL would get the deal by offering the most attractive price to CSSA and win the action | 4. ICL had to be sure
Premium Leveraged buyout Debt Leverage
the information assembled‚ team A recommends the purchase of corporation B. this company has a significantly higher net present value (NPV) at $48035.14 compared to corporation A at $20979.21. Corporation B also has a higher internal rate of return (IRR) at 16.94% compared to corporation A at 13.05%. At first glance of the income statement‚ it appears corporation A is a better potential value with a slightly higher net income at $79822.41 compared to corporation B at $79670.51. After analysis and considering
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
|Case 9 | |Performance Boating Products‚ Inc. | Performance Boating Products‚ Inc I. Situation Analysis • Performance Boating Products‚ Inc (PBP) manufactures attachments for boat hulls and motors that aid watercraft in reducing drag and maintaining ‘plane’. • PBP attachments can be integrated as part of new
Premium Net present value Discounted cash flow Internal rate of return
internal rate of return for all the firms bonds. First the coupon on the bond is found for each of the remaining years until maturity‚ then we deduct tax‚ finally we choose test two discount factors and put our findings into the following formula; IRR = DCF1 + (DCF2 – DCF1) * NPV1 – 0 / NPV1 - NPV2 Once we have found our KE and KD we must find the weights of both the equity and debt capital. Finally all of this information is entered into our WACC formula which is as follows where MV is is the market
Premium Weighted average cost of capital
Capital Budgeting Techniques (Summary) | | Decision Rule | | | | |Method |Independent |Mutually Exclusive |Formula ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff |Advantagesffffffffff |Disadvantagesfffffffff | |Average Accounting Return|Accept the project if the|Choose the project
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Decision theory
Chapter 9&10‚ financial policy 1) Duval Inc uses only equity capital‚ … answer: with a 11% return cuz wacc = 10% 2) 10.038: which one is correct? One defect of the IRR method that is assumes that the cash flows to be received from a project can be reinvested the IRR itself‚ and that assumption is often not valid. 3) Stern Associates is considering a project that has the following cash flows data. What’s the project’s payback? Year: from 0 to 5‚ cash flows: -1100$‚ 300$‚ 310$‚ 320$‚ 330$
Premium Net present value Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
the present value of the annuity =$5000/8%*[1-(1/1+8%)^(25-2)] = $51‚855.29 ! ! ! C5-q11 A:(1)IRR(DF):$-750000+$310000/(1+r)+$430000(1+r)^2+ $330000(1+r)^3=0 r=19.8253% IRR(SR)=$-2100000+$1200000/(1+r)+$760000(1+r)^2+$850000/ (1+r)^3=0 r=17.3641% since r1>r2 project deepwater fishing should be chosen. (2)incremental cash flow: initial investment: -$1350000 year1:$890000 year2:$330000 year3: $520000 IRR : $-1350000+$890000/(1+r)+$330000/(1+r)^2+$520000/(1+r)^3=0 r=15.76% since 15.76%>14% ‚ project
Premium Net present value