role being to assist their child in their growth and creating a supportive and loving environment. Appeals to traditional paternalistic values are made to indicate that the author’s opinion is of benefit to the audience (target audience being parents) because the author seemingly knows best. “Our culture puts a greater value on work than it does family and community life.” This quote is a direct appeal to one’s values of traditional paternalism. The author’s idea that parents are now putting more value
Premium Appeal Child Idea
I am writing to appeal to get back into the nursing program. I feel that a lot has changed since I first went into the nursing program. I for one am more confident in myself and know that if I push myself a little more I can do anything. I have made a plan for when and if I get back into the program. The first semester that I was in nursing‚ I had a very heavy workload. I was taking 17 credits and was very stressed throughout the semester. This semester‚ I am doing very well in my general classes
Premium English-language films 2006 singles 2008 singles
(name) (Home Address) (Zip Code) (561) (Personal Email) (name of school) Office of Student Financial Aid (school address) Dear Financial Aid Office: “Invest in a human Soul who known it may be a diamond in the rough” stated by our beloved Founder Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune. My name is (insert name)‚ a (insert classification) majoring in (insert major)‚ the purpose of this letter is for reconsideration of Financial Aid eligibility and to also continue on and becoming an Alumni of this
Premium Academic degree Investment Academia
Subashini Rajasingam v. Saravanan Thangathoray & Other Appeals [2008] 2 CLJ 1 FC Summary of the case: (4 marks) There were three appeals (02-19-2007(W)‚ 02-20-2007(W) and 02-21-2007(W)) before us and with the agreements of the parties‚ they were heard together. The parties to the three appeals were originally Hindus husband and wife; they were married pursuant to a civil ceremony of marriage that was registered on 26 July 2001 pursuant to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (the 1976
Premium Marriage Appeal
Company kept judicial and executive functions separate since year 1793. But this system was not perfect; the appointment procedure of judges was faulty. Executive became judge and judge became executive vice versa because of lack of experience judiciary suffered as executive failed to do justice to judiciary. In 1868‚ company officers pointed out that native judges and pleaders who had received a regular legal education at the Calcutta University had a better knowledge than the civilian‚ executive
Free Judge Court Jurisdiction
appellate process. Judicial officers and counsel could adapt to the changes relatively easily‚ and the process could be grafted onto existing sentencing appeals processes. Why is judicial discretion considered not fair and inconsistent?? Judicial discretion varies from area to area and the key disadvantage of relying upon sentencing appeals to ensure sentence consistency is that the process is purely reactive. ‘Gibbon’ believed that judicial discretion is the ’first engine of tyranny’. The opposition
Premium Law Appeal
CASE ANALYSIS: Case: Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Introduction: Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company Ltd is one of the most leading cases in the law of contracts under common law. Known for both its academic importance and its contribution in the development of the laws relating unilateral contracts‚ it is still binding on lower courts in England and Wales‚ and is still cited by judges in their judgements. This research paper aims to critically examine and analyze the
Premium Contract Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company Invitation to treat
Real life Personification Throughout the film Blackfish the filmmaker’s objective was to appeal to the audience’s senses and side with the killer whales. Incorporating ethos‚ logos‚ and pathos in the film through interviews and statistics helped spread this film and leave an impact on everybody who watched it. The film took an interesting approach to displaying how SeaWorld was trying to hide from the audience and the visitors to the parks around the world. By showing clips of emotional kids
Premium Film director Rhetoric Logos
courts before it reached the United States Supreme Court. List those three courts in order‚ beginning with the court that has the most authority and ending with the court that has the least amount of authority. a. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals b. Texas Court of Appeals Fifth District c. Dallas County Criminal Court 5. Provide the citation for the United States Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Texas v Johnson‚ 491 U.S.397 (1989) 6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision
Premium United States Law Supreme Court of the United States
1995 Relevant Facts: Appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria. 19 June 1991 Giovanni Masciantonio had a heated altercation with his son-in-law Maurizio Femia. Altercation resulted in Mr. Femia’s life. Fatal wound being a severed aorta (known as wound 5). Giovanni Masciantonio was convicted of murder in the Supreme Court of Victoria. O’Bryan J trial judge. The defence argued provocation. An appeal was put before the Court of Criminal Appeal Victoria. Reason for the appeal was that the judge
Premium Court Law Judge