Analysis Energy Flow Earthquake Analysis 2 Buildings Reaction towards Earthquake Structural Members and design Beams & Columns as a Structural Members Horizontal Bands Shear Wall Boundary elements Concealed Beams Reduced Beams General Design Consideration Inverse pendulum effect Beam column design Short Column Behavior Beam Column Joint Recent trends in Seismic resistive design Bracings Bearings Dampers Friction Pendulum Epoxy
Premium Earthquake engineering Beam Structural engineering
determine: a b Identify what kind of structural member are AB and CD respectively. The maximum force P that can be applied to the handle of so the member CD does not fail. The shear force and bending moment diagrams for member AB for this load. The required diameter for the round member AB to resist only the bending action of the force P (use a factor of safety F.S.=2). The diameter of the pin C‚ also made of A-36 steel‚ so it acts as a fail-safe mechanism to limit the loading of the member CD to 75%
Premium Force Shear strength Continuum mechanics
Statics and Dynamics 1. The diagram below shows the loading on one of the horizontal floor beams and associated supporting vertical columns for a proposed building‚ sited on an incline. In order to consider the worst case‚ assume that the beam is simply supported and the column is pin jointed at either end. 1.1 Determine the beam reaction forces at each support and . Taking moments around (2 x 50) + (6 x 70) + (10 x 20) = (8 x ∴ = = 90 KN So‚ = 50 + 70 + 20 = + 90
Premium Torque Force Bending
Tutorials Introduction to steel beam competition Laboratory safety induction • • • • Milestones Team setup Print AS4100 & AS1170.0-.2 Beam competition released Teams allocated for fabrication lab sessions and notified 2 3 4 • Bending of laterally restrained beams • Geometric design & section capacity of I-beam • • Bending of laterally unrestrained beams Typical floor system & gravity load estimation • • • • • • Member capacity of I-beam Building project Development of
Premium Structural engineering Column Beam
2.2 Discussions 5 3. Conclusions & Recommendations 6 References 6 * ABSTRACT This experiment is conducted to calculate the transverse bending deflection of the tie bar and compare it to the theoretical values. There are two theoretical formulae that are given in this experiment which are simple theory method and exact formula. By comparing the values‚ the adequate method to calculate the
Premium Beam Theory Science
Solids | | Adam McCreevey | 3/15/2013 | This is a laboratory to learn how to make measurements using a strain gauge by using different configurations‚ also to determine experimentally the axial and transverse stress at the surface of the beam and compare them to theoretical calculations | Introduction If a length of wire is subject to a stress within its elastic limits‚ the resulting elongation and change of diameter alters the resistance. The resulting principle is used in the resistance
Premium Beam Shear stress
COUNTRY ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ARCHITECTURAL MOVEMENT RENAISSANCE BAROQUE ROCOCO Age of awakening or the rebirth Period of Artistic style “Late Baroque” was ornate and made strong usage of creamy‚ pastel-like colours‚ asymmetrical designs‚ curves and gold. Italy Plan • Central plan • Concave or Convex on plan • Oval plans Wall • • Often painted Ceiling • Ribbed Vault • Flat ceilings of wood and plaster. • Contains Large frescos Doors • Richly carved frames‚ sometimes arched and
Premium Corinthian order Italy Baroque
The primary tools for the lab consisted of 10 ceramic tiles and a Instron machine. The Instron machine was initially set up for 3-point bending by a technician. The base and thickness of the tile was then measured. Following that the length of the ______ was measured. Next‚ the Instron machine was set to 50 lb/min and 5 tiles was tested using 3 point bending. The max load to fracture in lb was recorded for each tile. Then‚ the Instron machine was set up for 4
Premium Force Chemistry Classical mechanics
Sample Calculations I-Beam (S8x18.4) Dimensions: D= 8 in; h= 7.148 in; bf= 4.001 in; tw= 0.271in; tf= 0.426in; L (length of the beam) =18.4 in I= (bf*D3 – h3 (bf – tw))/12= 57.6 in4; E (Referenced value of Young’s modulus) = 29X106 psi Theoretical Strain: ε= σ/E= (M*y)/(E*I) P = load a = distance from support to the applied load (48 in) y = distance from neutral axis to the extreme element in y-direction The sing in the theoretical strain (±) determines if the strain is in compression
Premium Beam Theory Experiment
will be using Bending Light simulation found at http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/bending-light II) Initial Observations: First‚ let’s get acquainted with the PhET sim that we will be using. The red button on the laser turns the light on. What do you notice about the angles of the reflected and refracted light? Briefly‚ give a qualitative description of the following features: What happens to the reflected and refracted rays as you change the angle of the incident light beam? The ray will
Free Light Refraction Total internal reflection