An Argument Against Divine Command Theory One may make the claim that if there is no God‚ then nothing is morally wrong. Those who are religious may believe this to be true‚ while it seems implausible for an atheist (at least one who claims to have any morals) to believe such a statement. Without addressing the issue of the existence of God‚ I will examine several facets of this claim in order to explore the two main points of view that a theist might have regarding this claim. A theist could agree
Premium God Divine command theory Religion
Divine Command Theory In order to analyze the argument presented by Russ Shafer- Landau against the divine command theory‚ it is important to first understand the concept of divine command theory. The author has presented the idea about the ethical objectivity of God which is against the Divine Command theory that says there are the existence of only one God and therefore the uncertainties about the skepticism that are moral in nature are halted for the time. The theory of divine command also
Premium Morality Logic Ethics
the law is a philosophical one‚ which probably has no definite answer to it. This is evident as we have seen a lot of legal theorists trying to come with answers to the question. Ronald Dworkin says it is “a set of explicitly adapted rules and ought to maximise the general welfare” ‚ Fuller on the other believed “law should withstand the scrutiny of reason and opposed the idea of legal positivism that law is no higher than a particular authority” ‚ John Austin defined it to be “the command of the
Premium Law Jurisprudence
THE HART-FULLER DEBATE It is important to consider‚ howbeit briefly‚ the academic exchanges between the proponents of legal positivism as represented by H.L.A. Hart and those of the natural law school represented by Lon Fuller. The gravamen of such academic discourse‚ usually tagged Hart-Fuller debate is to be found in the Harvard Law Review 1958. Curzon identifies the background of the debate as the atrocities committed by Germany during the 2nd World War. Under the National-Socialist regime
Premium Law Jurisprudence
“describe” the law separate and distinct from morality or ideology. WHAT MAKES KELSEN A LEGAL POSITIVIST? 1. Kelsen’s theory is free from ideological issues‚ and no value judgments are made concerning the “legal system per se.” 2. Historical‚ sociological and moral issues are beyond the scope of Kelsen’s pure theory of law. As such‚ Kelsen’s “Pure Theory” attempts to examine and define what law “is” outside the purview of these normative areas. “The pure theory of law is a theory of positive
Premium Law
Jane Austen has attracted a great deal of critical attention in recent years. Many have spoken out about the strengths and weaknesses of her characters‚ particularly her heroines. Austen has been cast as both a friend and foe to the rights of women. According to Morrison‚ ’most feminist studies have represented Austen as a conscious or unconscious subversive voicing a woman’s frustration at the rigid and sexist social order which enforces subservience and dependence’; (337). Others feel that her
Free Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Emma
John Austin (1790-1859) was a British legal philosopher and was the first Professor of Jurisprudence at London University. His publications had a profound influence on English jurisprudence. They include The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832)‚ and Lectures on Jurisprudence. John Austin is best known for his work developing the theory of legal positivism. He attempted to clearly separate moral rules from "positive law." Austin’s theory also falls under Constitutions‚ International Law‚ non-sanctioned
Premium Law Jurisprudence
27) Put simply‚ are God’s commands right because God commanded them or did God command them because they are right? In what follows‚ I will explain what unrestricted divine command theory tries to accomplish‚ why Euthyphro’s dilemma poses a few significant problems to its views‚ and I will argue how embracing a restricted version of divine command theory can help avoid the obstacles the dilemma sets in place. It can be well argued that the unrestricted divine command theory is aimed to explain what
Premium God Good and evil Divine command theory
According to Jenkins‚ “The natural law theory begins with theories about the nature and purpose of the world and moves on to ask about the purpose of every action or object. The right thing to do is that which fulfils the natural purpose.” Natural law was developed by Thomas Aquinas‚ in which he believed that there is such a thing as natural moral law. Natural law ethics depends on the belief that the world was designed by a creator‚ God. It teaches everything God made has a purpose‚ including every
Premium Human rights
Gregg Cantrell‚ author of Stephen F. Austin: Political and Cultural Mediator‚ is a Texas A&M Alumni who graduated with his Ph.D. in History in 1988. Cantrell began his career in the field of history as a lecturer at TAMU in ’86‚ then spent 15 years working as an assistant and later an associate professor at a variety of notable universities around Texas. In 2001‚ Cantrell got his first job as a professor. Cantrell currently resides in Fort Worth where he works as a history professor at TCU. Cantrell
Premium Texas