Case Brief Case name‚ citation‚ and court Walker v. Quillen 622 A.2d 1097 (Del. 1993) Supreme Court of Delaware Key Facts A. Quillen owns a piece of land known as Bluff Point‚ B. Walker owns a piece of land close to Bluff Point where there is a narrow dirt ‘’public’’ road. C. Implied easement states that Quillen is entitled to cross over a portion of Walker’s land to access Bluff Point. D. Water access was not feasible for access to Bluff Point. E. Walker said
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law Supreme court
1. Review the decision in the case of Shah v. HSBC (2012) and evaluate the implications of the decision for regulated financial services firms. In particular: * What are the key issues in the case? * Outline the decision of the court * Evaluate what practical guidelines can be taken from the case by regulated financial services firms Under the proceeds of crimes act 2002 (POCA) all UK financial institutions and other regulated firms not only have to report suspicions of money laundering
Premium Appeal 1965 Lawsuit
POWELL v ALABAMA United States Supreme Court 287 U.S. 45 (1932) FACTS: Nine young black boys riding in an open train car were involved in a fight. When the fight ceased‚ two white women claimed the black boys raped them. Once the boys got off the train in Scottsboro‚ Alabama‚ police picked them up and placed them in jail. The men appeared in court‚ frightened‚ and unrepresented. The defendants were charged with a capital offence and therefore had the right for counsel to be appointed to them
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Legal terms Capital punishment
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania Facts of the Case The case involved Joseph McKeiver‚ and Edward Terry‚ from two different charges. McKeiver was charged with robbery‚ larceny‚ and receiving stolen goods as acts of juvenile delinquency. Terry was charged with assault and battery on a police officer. The officer was breaking up a fight when Terry began hitting him with his fists and a stick. The next week‚ he was then charged and committed with assault on a teacher. Both juveniles were denied a jury trial
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
| |Legal Memo Format Date: 3/13/2013 Re: A.16 (pg1223): Cafazzo v. Central Medical Health Services‚ Inc 542 Pa. 526‚ 668 A.2d 521‚1995 (Pennsylvania Supreme Court) Facts Cafazzo (Plaintiff) sued Central Medical Health Services and Physician that did the surgery (Defendants) for product liability for an implanted medical device that failed six years after his surgery in 1986. Cafazzo had surgery for the implantation of a mandibular
Premium Physician Surgery Medicine
Jake Farmer Goss v. Lopez This case happened in 1975 when a couple of students including D. Lopez were suspended for misconduct at school. The Ohio revised code allows a school principle to expel or suspend a student for up to 10 days. If a student is expelled he has the right to a hearing that could lead to his reinstatement. The Columbus public school did not give any of the Apelles the right to a hearing or. When the Columbus Public school did not give them their hearings they withdrawd the
Free Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution High school
Brief Fact Summary. Police officers sought a bombing suspect and evidence of the bombing at the petitioner‚ Miss Mapp’s (the “petitioner”) house. After failing to gain entry on an initial visit‚ the officers returned with what purported to be a search warrant‚ forcibly entered the residence‚ and conducted a search in which obscene materials were discovered. The petitioner was tried and convicted for these materials. Rule of Law. All evidence discovered as a result of a search and seizure conducted
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Notes on Ceballos v Garcetti Richard Ceballos had been employed since 1989 as a deputy district attorney for the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office‚ which at the time was headed by Gil Garcetti. After the defense attorney in a pending criminal case contacted Ceballos about his motion to challenge a critical search warrant based on inaccuracies in the supporting affidavit‚ Ceballos conducted his own investigation and determined that the affidavit contained serious misrepresentations. Ceballos
Free Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Kubasek‚ N.‚ K.‚ Brennan‚ B.A.‚ and Browne‚ M.N. (n.d.). The legal environment of business: A critical thinking approach (3rd Ed). In R. Hartigan (Ed.). Ethics and legal concepts for business. Upper Saddle River‚ NJ: Peason/Prentice Hall. Liebeck’s v. McDonald’s Rest.‚ P.T.S. Inc. and McDonald’s International‚Inc. No. CV-93-02419‚ 1995 WL 360309 (N.M. Dist.Ct. August 18‚ 1994). Press‚ A.‚ & Carroll‚ G. (1995‚ March 20). Are lawyers burning America? Newsweek‚ 125(12)‚ 32. Retrieved February 14‚
Premium Tort Burn Damages
Chapter 1 The Problem and its Background Introduction Agreement is the grammatical logic or coherence in the links between parts of a sentence. An example of agreement is the subject-verb agreement‚ wherein the subject and the verb are considered the significant form (Ramos 87). In subject verb agreement‚ the general rule that we follow is that the verb should always agree with the subject. A singular subject requires a singular verb‚ and a plural subject requires a plural verb. To apply
Premium Pronoun Verb English language