Preview

Liebeck V. Mcdonalds

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1640 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liebeck V. Mcdonalds
This paper will consider the facts associated with the case of Stella Liebeck versus McDonald’s, resulting from Ms. Liebeck’s efforts to collect for damages sustained when she spilled extremely hot coffee into her lap in 1992. The issues, applicable laws and the conclusion the jury reached will also be covered as well as the subsequent impacts on American tort law following this decision. The facts in the Liebeck case start with the incident description as recounted by Aric Press in the March 20, 1995 issue of Newsweek. Ms. Liebeck was a recently retired, 79 year old woman who ordered coffee at a McDonald’s drive through and received it in a lidded, styrofoam cup (Press, 1995, p. 32).
After the order was picked up, her grandson pulled his car forward and stopped so that she could add cream and sugar to her coffee. After placing the cup between her knees since the car had no cup holders, she attempted to remove the plastic lid. The entire contents of the cup spilled into her lap, burning her severely. Subsequently, Ms. Liebeck suffered second and third degree burns on her groin, inner thighs and buttocks (Press, 1995, p.32). Ms. Liebeck spent several days in the hospital for her burns and another period of weeks at home recuperating. Subsequently, she was readmitted to the hospital for skin grafts. (Press, 1995, p. 3). It was confirmed that the coffee was stored at a temperature of approximately 180 to 190 degrees, per industry standards (Howard, 1994, p.1), which is likely to cause third degree burns with only a few seconds exposure. The temperature at which McDonald’s kept their coffee was reported to be approximately 40 degrees hotter than that made in a home brewed pot of coffee (Howard, 1994, p.1).
McDonald’s had previously received reports of over seven hundred (700) burn incidents form scalding hot coffee and had not at all reacted to the situation (Press, 1995, p. 32). Prior to the incident in question, Ms. Liebeck had never before



References: Coffin, B. (2004, February). Courting Disaster? Risk Management, 51, 2, p.4 Gerlin, A., (1994, September 24). McDonald’s callousness was real issue, jurors say, in case of burned woman. Pittsburgh Post Gazette, P. B2. Howard, T. (1994, August 29). Nation’s Restaurant News, Vol. 28, issue 34, p.1 Kubasek, N., K., Brennan, B.A., and Browne, M.N. (n.d.). The legal environment of business: A critical thinking approach (3rd Ed). In R. Hartigan (Ed.). Ethics and legal concepts for business. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Peason/Prentice Hall. Liebeck’s v. McDonald’s Rest., P.T.S. Inc. and McDonald’s International,Inc. No. CV-93-02419, 1995 WL 360309 (N.M. Dist.Ct. August 18, 1994). Press, A., & Carroll, G. (1995, March 20). Are lawyers burning America? Newsweek, 125(12), 32. Retrieved February 14, 2008, from Business Source Premier database. The Mighty Quinn. (2002, July 25). Daily News, Sports, p. 3

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a direct and proximate cause of the negligent acts of Defendant Anheuser-Busch or its employees as set forth above, Plaintiff has incurred the following expenses for medical care and attention:…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Regardless if a corporation is an instrumentality agency if a foreign state owns the majority shares of the company at the time of a lawsuit brought against them it gives rise to possible litigation (Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson). The requirements of FSIA can define if a company is eligible for the instrumentality status. The instrumentality status also determines if a company’s jurisdiction and ownership are met due to the fact these are two critical elements.…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spilled coffee is a foreseeable circumstance from going through a drive through. It was undetermined if temperature the coffee was served at was too hot. It was determined there was no breach of warranty, there was not adequate warning about the product and there was no negligence as far as the emotional damage was concerned.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samantha Smith Case

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our case Samantha Smith had an accident in a retail store where she slipped on shampoo that had leaked from the bottle and suffered a broken hip. In her suite against the store Samantha claims the store is at fault; however, the store claims that Samantha failed to exercise due care while shopping and that she is partially to blame for the accident. The three articles below pertain to our case in one way or another.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Coffee Association advises that coffee should be brewed at 195 to 205 degree Fahrenheit for the ideal extraction and served at 180 to 185 degrees Fahrenheit. The law firm of Gallivan, White and Boyd gave their opinion that “Just because a product can cause serious injury when handled negligently doesn’t not mean that product is unreasonably dangerous when and if used properly” (The Original Hot Coffee Product Liability Case, Gwblawfirm.com). I believe the severity of Liebeck’s injuries and her old age is what made the jury feel sympathetic and side against McDonalds restaurants. Liebeck argued that there was no warning label on the McDonalds coffee cup to inform the customer. However on McDonalds promotional poster and on their website there was sample picture that showed “Caution: Contents Hot” in an orange text on the cup. In my opinion I do not think McDonalds should have been held accountable for Liebeck acting careless with hot coffee. However, McDonalds should have covered Liebeck’s medical expenses out of good faith since they could easily afford it. McDonalds sending Liebeck for $800, which didn’t even cover half of her medical bills, displays McDonalds lack of concern and sympathy for Liebeck’s horrendous injury. Even worse, from 1982 to 1992, McDonalds coffee has burned more than 700…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously. While watching these people from his police car, Officer McFadden noticed that these two men appeared to be planning a criminal attack. The two men were walking back and forth in front of a store while conspiring with each other. When McFadden approached the two men and identified himself as a law enforcement officer, he walked them down the street and frisked them for weapons or illegal drugs. When searching the men, Officer McFadden found a handgun. The individuals were taken into police custody and charged with carrying a concealed weapon.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 3 Risk Assesment

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    |2nd |This could cause someone to slip with a hot drink and burn themselves or it could also cause someone|…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ms Liebeck spilled her coffee on herself which caused her to get burned. She sustained 3rd degree burns because the coffee was brewed at a higher temperature than other restaurants. The case was ruled in favor of Ms. Liebeck. The jury declared McDonald’s negligent because their coffee was found to be 20 degrees hotter than it should have been. McDonald’s had received many complaints about their coffee being too hot and failed to do anything about it. So their actions were considered to be reckless because they did not warn their customers about the temperature of the…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For each legal issue the film provided a case or story in order for the viewer to better understand the situations at hand. The first case provided was the case of Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s, the case of the hot coffee. Mrs. Liebeck’s family thoroughly and genuinely explain the case, differing in facts and tone from the media and tort reform…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    University of the People Assignment Week 7 28MAY2018 Student X Introduction: In my paper, I hope to address the case study known as “Hot Coffee” with regard to the following questions: What does caveat emptor mean? According to this doctrine, who is responsible for Stella Liebeck’s burns?…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spontaneous Human Combustion, also known as SHC, is a type of fire that is mysterious and unexplainable. Many scientists tried to determine if it is real. SHC is when a person bursts into flames from a chemical reaction from an external source. Spontaneous means the fire spreads quickly. Combustion means the process of burning.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roasting: Roasting is vertically integrated into Starbucks, such that the company roasts the beans itself . Due to a potential hold-up and moral hazard problem that leads to high transaction cost, it is inefficient for Starbucks to outsource bean roasting. Since Starbucks values the quality of their product at the highest priority and “considers the roasting of its coffee beans to be an art form” , they have strict and high standards for their quality checks. More specifically, they use a blood-cell analyzer to test color of the beans. This requires a high degree of asset specificity such that other companies do not require this equipment to check the quality of their roasted beans and leads to a potential hold-up problem. Moreover, as evidenced by the fact that the Senior…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics