Coursework Ratio Analysis of Tesco and Sainsbury Introduction This report details the results of a ratio analysis of two of the largest retailers in the UK: Sainsbury and Tesco based on their audited financial statements for the financial years ending 2011‚ 2012‚ and 2013. The two companies are compared with each other based on their profitability and liquidity ratios. This report then critically interprets the results of the ratio analysis calculations and then discusses the weaknesses of ratio analysis
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
The aim of this report is to analysis the financial performance of J Sainsbury plc by compare several ratios‚ in the view of an investor who seeking long term investment. Four sections will be illustrated‚ the background of Sainsbury‚ 10 ratio analysis‚ a suggestion of whether the company is worth to invest and a limitation of current financial statements and ratio analysis. J Sainsbury plc is the third largest chain company of supermarkets in the UK‚ which is generally known as Sainsbury’s. It
Premium Finance Sainsbury's Marketing
industry‚ accounting for roughly 60% of all funding (The US Defense‚ 2004). With the number of US air travelers projected to increase annually over the next 20 years‚ Boeing has a good chance of avoiding job-losses related to government budget cuts and may be the most reliable provider of long-term employment out of the three companies. Boeing has also outsourced their product worldwide‚ receiving approximately 50% of funding from domestic sources and the other 50% from international (The US Defense‚ 2004)
Premium Airline Aircraft United States
Case # 10: The Boeing 7E7 Presenting Date: October 24th‚ 2012 Course Number: Fire 417 Cases in Financial Management Section: 901 Instructor: Dr. Manu Gupta Group Number: 4 Group members: Peter Lee‚ Siravuth Punyataweekul and Stephen Woolard. Case Summary: 1.) In early 2003‚ Boeing announced plans to design and sell an airliner named the 7E7. Boeing aimed for the 7E7 to be more fuel efficient‚ carry between 200 and 250 passengers‚ able to accomplish both domestic and international
Premium Boeing Commercial Airplanes Boeing Boeing 787
fluctuation appeared. Ratio analysis Year/ratio 2011 2012 2013 Industry average Current ratio 0.90 0.77 0.82 Quick ratio 0.78 0.65 0.70 Gross profit ratio 55.6 51.7 54.6 Receivable turnover ratio 13.59 13.95 12.49 Inventory turnover ratio 18.45 19.25 19.51 Net profit ratio 1.74 -1.64 0.03 Debt to equity ratio 0.89 0.92 0.88 Asset turnover ratio 0.70 0.71 0.77 Current ratio is always larger than quick ratio‚ it may because that inventory
Premium Currency Financial ratios United States dollar
ON RATIO ANALYSIS AT ZEUS SOLUTIONS‚ CHENNAI BY K.ILAYABHARATHI (Reg.No-212411631013) Of SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SUMMER PROJECT Submitted to the FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the award of the degree Of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIONIN HUMAN RESOURCE ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI-600 025 JULY 2012 BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE This is to certify that this Project report titled A STUDY ON RATIO ANALYSIS AT
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Financial ratio
Boeing Case Study: Questions 1. The market structure for the Dreamliner could be said to somewhat fall under the Oligopoly structure which is a market dominated by a small number of firms that together control the majority of the market share. Or a under the monopoly structure because it is the only firm that produced the Dreamliner of its kind that was unique in its own way. And there is no replica of it. The demand of the Dreamliner from its customers proved to be off the roof and attracted
Premium Boeing 787 Boeing Commercial Airplanes Monopoly
Financial Results FIN/571 July 22‚ 2013 Interpreting Financial Results Liquidity: Current Ratio Parrino‚ Kidwell‚ & Bates (2012) detail the current ratio as current assets divided by liabilities. The current ratio identifies a firm’s potential to pay short-term liabilities; higher liquidity is a good sign for potential creditors (Parrino et al.‚ 2012). At the same time‚ however‚ the current ratio should not greatly exceed benchmarks of other competitors (Parrino et al.‚ 2012). This could be
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue Financial ratios
Ratio analysis is a useful technique for comparing a company’s performance and position with other companies. However‚ such comparisons may be misleading. Some of the limitations of ratio analysis for cross-sectional comparisons are discussed below: Accounting policies: Accounting laws allow companies to choose accounting policies and use discretion while preparing accounts. Such a freedom leads to differences in the accounts of companies‚ which in turn distorts cross-sectional company comparisons
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Financial ratio
A CASE STUDY ON “RATIO ANALYSIS” With reference to VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT‚ VISAKHAPATNAM PROJECT REPORT (A Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Business Administration in Andhra University) Submitted by S. SUNDARA GAYATHRI MBA (FINANCE) Regd : 07ME10092 Under the guidance of Mr. JAMMAYYA Manager (F&A) ANDHRA UNIVERSITY (2007-2008) CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the Project report
Premium Steel Pig iron