your consulting firm to produce a report on this possible breach of contract case‚ including recommendations. Use the report writing guide from the course website. In your analysis of this case include answers to the following questions: Q. 1. Did Goliath breach the contract? Specifically discuss whether the showing by a competitor movie chain in Toronto constituted a violation of the Goliath/Giant agreement. Q.2. Assuming the contract is valid‚ prepare the following financial analyses:
Premium Contract Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Income statement
judge‚ arguing that his client Mr. Weinberg was claiming $85‚246.87 in disparagement of property and for breaking a leasing contract. When it was the defendant’s turn‚ he did not give an extensive opening statement‚ he simply said that he was not going to pay what the plaintiff asked for since he had never set a foot on the property and that he was in his right to cancel the contract within 72 hours. When the Plaintiff stepped in to testify he was showing confidence and his lawyer was presenting evidence
Premium Contract Contract law Law
that she should have ‘ignored what other people were earning.’ The Claim Mrs. Bryne brought her claim for breach of contract and for sexual discrimination because her boss made a comment that all women who were of child-bearing age should be sterilized. She was sacked after sending the memo and only given three months’ notice rather than the six months to which she was entitled under her contract. This resulted in her not being able to claim for unfair dismissal. At the Tribunal Another employee confirmed
Premium Human resource management Recruitment Employment
conversion. The action depended upon whether a valid contract was made between the nephew and the uncle. Since there was no acceptance of the contract‚ the court decided that Felthouse did not have any ownership over the horse. Acceptance between the parties should be communicated loudly and clearly and cannot be imposed because of no response from one of the parties. The uncle is not entitled to impose a sale through silence whereby the contract would only fail by disapproval. Even though the nephew
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
Assignment Topic: One of the main ways in which the ‘veil of incorporation’ can be lifted is when directors breach their duties. This essay question is set around the duty to prevent insolvent trading. You will need to have read the chapter in your prescribed text that deals with this duty and have then researched more widely by looking at other textbooks‚ the relevant CCH online library‚ articles from the internet and journal articles. You must answer both parts of this topic. Please make
Premium Corporate governance Executive director Breach of contract
making daily funs transfer just RM 1‚000 (about $299.32) under the threshold for which MavCap’s approval was required‚ but in combination such daily transfer greatly excced the RM 100‚000 approval threshold. b) This case is based upon the breach of contract. c) This case is related to the operation of the business because the action of Mobifusion that proceeding to take funds without MavCap’s approval could probably cause damages for the business of MavCap. d) The Court is asked to issue a writ
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
COMM 315 - FINAL EXAM REVIEW Contract of Employment: *Contract: document/understanding between two people) [2085] Employer directs/controls work (give work‚ feedback‚ job tools‚ place to work) of Employee Contractor: No direction and control‚ contractor sets his own daily schedule‚ vacation schedule‚ provides his own tools (e.g. computer) e.g. lawyer: is hired as an agent/agency‚ does not direct/control [2086] contract can be for a fixed period of time or indeterminate time (open-ended)
Premium Contract Damages Tort
The issue is related to Law of Contract under discharge of frustration and impossibility of performance. The fact of the case is Chef Joe entered into a contract with Ixora Hotel to be the chief judge for a series of cooking contest organized by the hotel. Ixora Hotel has paid Chef Joe RM15‚ 000 and agreed to pay another RM15‚ 000 after the contest. However‚ Chef Joe met an accident and suffered severe injuries as for the consequences. Whether the contract between Ixora Hotel and Chef Joe is
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
harmed party for loss or injury--for harm already suffered) desire to substitute money for a harm -- to replace something with money (designed to make P as well off as he would have been had he never been wronged) Contracts cases: to protect P’s expectation value "GENERAL" vs. "SPECIAL" DAMAGES: GENERAL/DIRECT/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES: Generally are those that are the consequence of and proximate result of the conduct of the D as to
Premium Tort Damages Judicial remedies
are for the creation of postal rule. First of all‚ the first justification is the “Ad Infinitum” justification where its main rationale is that acceptance by post has to be valid on posting because if there were no postings which mean there is no contract formed. Based on the case of Adam v Lindsell‚ the defendant actually mail the offer of selling wool to plaintiff and the plaintiff was requested on mailing back to the defendant. Unfortunately there was an error in the offered price and plaintiff
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law