"You’re not going." Just like that‚ they struck a deal. Of course‚ only one of them were aware of the deal and its terms: one man would enforce his will‚ and the other would cave. "I’m sorry‚ I don’t want trouble‚" Solomon said in an apologetic‚ non-threatening tone. "I just want to pass through and get home peacefully. I’m not bothering anyone." Solomon’s hands were raised shoulder height with his palms facing the man in front of him‚ the universal sign for "I give up." It was true‚ he really
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term
CHCCS400C – Work within a relevant legal and ethical framework: Assignment 1 What you have to do Students need to complete three (3) tasks: Task A: Complete ten (10) short answer questions based on the learning materials. Task B: Case study. Complete eleven (11) short answer questions. Task C: Complete six (6) short answer questions based on the learning material. Task A Students need to answer the following questions: 1. Why is it important for a worker in the Community Services Industry to
Premium Contract Contract law Law
Introduction and Major hindrances of 1978 Land use Act: In the Niger Delta region‚ the traditional land holding system have been thwarted by the land use act as the interest of a majority of the people have been hijacked by a few powerful individual who now control land and land resources in collaboration with multinational companies. In most part of southern Nigeria‚ particularly the Niger Delta region‚ the administration of Landwas carried out under the customary tenure. At this point of
Premium Management Risk Contract
Richard L. W. Clarke LITS2306 Notes 05A 1 MATTHEW ARNOLD “THE FUNCTION OF CRITICISM AT THE PRESENT TIME” (1864) Arnold‚ Matthew. “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time.” Critical Theory Since Plato. Ed. Hazard Adams. New York: Harcourt‚ Brace‚ Jovanovich‚ 1971. 592-603. Pragmatic theorists from Plato onwards have emphasised the impact which literature has on the reader. Here‚ Arnold‚ arguably England’s most important cultural critic in the second half of the nineteenth century and someone
Premium Management Investment Marketing
i) What is code of conduct from the legal perspective? The US Legal Definitions defined Code of Conduct as a set of law and regulations to govern appropriate manner or behavior to one organization or group. Thus‚ COC in the context of legal perspective generally can be divided into two categories. The categories relied on the Code’s legal status‚ which are soft law and hard law instrument. Hard law are also refer to compulsory code of conduct (CCOC). According to Abbott and Snidal (2000)‚ hard law
Premium Law Common law Contract
In Haugen v. Ford Motor Co.‚ the requirement of Article 2-302(2) that the court required an affording opportunity for the buyer to present evidence to aid the court in making a determination. In this case‚ Plaintiff buyer challenged the judgment of the District Court of Williams County (North Dakota) that granted summary judg-ment in favor of defendant manufacturer dismissing the buyer’s damage claim based on a liability exclusion for damage from fire. The buyer filed a complaint against the man-ufacturer
Premium Contract Contract law Law
1. What was the legal issue? What did the court decide? This case is based upon Mr. Stanbury‚ who worked as a project manager for Signal Construction from 1984 to 1985‚ and was fired allegedly because he was "not doing his job properly‚" according to Signal’s personnel manager. But nevertheless‚ the termination reason that Signal informed Mr. Stanbury was due to "lack or reduction in work". Mr. Stanbury took legal action against Signal Construction for defamation. This is because he claims
Premium Ethics Law Contract law
According to the 1958 Conventions‚ the application of the equidistance method was compulsory in the absence of an agreement‚ historical titles or special circumstances. This was name the combined equidistance/special circumstances rule. The emergence of the equidistance principle in early treaty law‚ such as in the 1958 Conventions‚ may be elucidate by the act that this principle struck a incontrovertible equilibrium between predictability and flexibility‚ objectiveness and discretion. Moreover
Premium Law Contract Common law
Retrospectively‚ rights in performance is given by the CPDA [ ] so a challenge arises when a performance takes place in a country which does not provide reciprocal protection before the commencement of the Act.[ ] In the case for this week’s assignment‚ a number of performances were performed in Stockholm in 1969 by Jimi Hendrix and the Swedish broadcasting association made a recording of it and made a public broadcast of the event. In 1970 Hendrix died intestate and the later his entire estate
Premium Law Contract Common law
Defendant‚ Union Oil Company of California‚ d/b/a/ UNOCAL (“Unocal”) responds to Plaintiffs’ allegations as follows. To the extent the allegations of the Amended Complaint are directed to Defendants other than Unocal‚ Unocal is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments and‚ therefore‚ denies them. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Denied. The allegations of Paragraph 1 are legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent a response
Premium Contract Law Contract law