Board has historically had a strong preference for using rates of return as its decision criteria. On occasions it has also used the payback period approach to decide between competing projects. However‚ Mike is convinced that the net present value (NPV) method is least flawed and when used correctly will always add the most value to a company’s wealth. After obtaining the cash flow projections for each project (see Tables 1 & 2)‚ and crunching out the numbers‚ Mike realizes that the hill is going
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
財務面分析 SALES 變 化 空 間 SALES 下 降 10% (與 模 組 比 ) NPV 變 化 12.3% 下降 5.3% 28% 25‚900 9.8% 上升 1.9% 64% The Barn 20‚500 16.4% 下降 18.1% 20% Goldie’s Square 300 8.1% 上升 45.1% 1358% Stadium Remodel 15‚700 10.8% 50% NPV IRR Gopher Place 16‚800 Whalen Court
Premium
Capital Budgeting Methods and Cash Flow Estimation Tasty Foods Corporation (Part A) November 5‚ 2012 Executive Summary: Tasty Foods has seen phenomenal growth throughout its lifetime in large part due to a continuous development of innovative new products. Although prosperous for Tasty Foods from its birth‚ this is a business initiative that in the past years‚ Tasty Foods has not maintained. Consumers are shifting towards a more health conscious lifestyle and until now Tasty Foods has not presented
Premium Net present value Costs Internal rate of return
CASE 1 - A CASE STUDY OF VICTORIA CHEMICALS Corporate Finance (FEG304) Table of Contents 1.0) Introduction This report contains two case studies in the discourse of Corporate Finance‚ more specifically capital investment strategy. The cases are applied on the fictional company Victoria Chemicals and are divided into (A): “The Merseyside Project and Victoria Chemicals” and (B): “The Merseyside and Rotterdam project”. The cases are picked from the book “Case Studies
Premium Net present value
Project Free Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) Project number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Initial investment (2‚000) (2‚000) (2‚000) (2‚000) (2‚000) (2‚000) (2‚000) (2‚000) Year 1 $ 330 $ 1‚666 $ 160 $ 280 $ 2‚200 $ 1‚200 $ (350) 2 330 334 200 280 900 (60) 3 330 165 350 280 300 60 4
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
size. The student’s task is to rank the projects. The first objective of the case is to examine critically the principal capital-budgeting criteria. A second objective is to consider the problem that arises when net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) disagree as to the ranking of two mutually exclusive projects. Finally‚ the case is a vehicle for introducing the problem created by attempting to rank projects of unequal life and the solution to that difficulty criterion. Please
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Rate of return
CHAPTER 8 MAKING CAPITAL INVESTMENT DECISIONS Answers to Concept Questions 1. In this context‚ an opportunity cost refers to the value of an asset or other input that will be used in a project. The relevant cost is what the asset or input is actually worth today‚ not‚ for example‚ what it cost to acquire. 2. a. Yes‚ the reduction in the sales of the company’s other products‚ referred to as erosion‚ should be treated as an incremental cash flow. These lost sales are included because
Premium Depreciation Cash flow Net present value
Depreciation in span classtab/span 15 yearsspan classtab/span span classtab/span span classtab/spanbr / Rate @ cost of capitalspan classtab/span 12span classtab/span span classtab/span span classtab/spanbr / br / A Objective Compute payback‚ NPV and IRR to decide whether Rainbow Products should purchase the machine or
Premium Net present value
Assignment Acknowledgement Sheet Module Title: Module Instructor : Semester: Programme: Module Leader: ECM05EKM – Financial Analysis for Managers Samatha Ravu Summer 2012 MBA-IT Samatha Ravu Intended Module Learning Outcomes Name of Student Due Date: Submitted on: Submitted to: Signature: Name and ID Fatima Hassan Al.Lawati PG11f1189 12 September 2012 through Moodle 12 September 2012 Through Moodle Signature 1 Table of Contents 1.0 2.0 Introduction ...................
Premium Financial ratios Variable cost Revenue
t Finance 333 Practice Examination 3 1. Given the following information on S & G Inc. capital structure‚ compute the company’s weighted average cost of capital. Type of Percent of Before Tax Capital Capital Structure Component Cost Bonds 40% 7.5% Preferred Stock 5% 11% Common Stock (Internal Only) 55% 15% The company’s marginal tax rate is 40%
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Corporate finance