BUSINESS LAW (BBL 2014) TRIMESTER 1‚ 2013/2014 SESSION Assignment title: Comparative Study and Analysis of The Laws of Malaysia and United States PREPARED BY: STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID ITTIPORN PRASERTSIT 1092701396 ER CHEE ZHENG 1102700368 ALI JAVIDFAR 1101106508 MUHAMMAD ASYRAF SHABARUDDIN 1061111744 SHAHIN BAGHERI 1092700846 PREPARED FOR: DR. BAHMA A/P A SIVASUBRAMANIAM
Premium Contract
Name Microbiology 2210 Answer Key Practice Test 1 Directions: Choose the most correct response to answer the statement. ___1. Archaea a. belong to the kingdom Protista b. have petidoglycan in their cell walls c. belong to the domain Bacteria
Premium Bacteria
Identification of Issue The first issue that need to be indentifies is whether the advertisement inserted by Rashid is an ivitation to treat (ITT) or a proposal. The second issue that need to be identifies is whether there exist a valid agreement between Joyce and Rashid. The third issue that need to be identifies is whether the revocation of proposal made by Rashid is valid. The fourth issue will be the effect of a contract entered into with a bankrupt and what kind of remedies were there have for
Premium Contract
EROSION OF CONSENSUS AD IDEM This work is to discuss about the erosion of “consensus ad idem” or called as “meeting of the minds”‚ to get to know about this we have to know about “Contract” where in which the “consensus ad idem” plays a very important role. Meaning and Definition of Contract: The word contract is derived from the Latin “contractum”‚ meaning “drawn together”. It‚ therefore‚ denotes a drawing together of two or more minds to form a common
Premium Contract
What are the modes of acceptance recognised under the Contracts Act 1950 (Revised 1974) and common law. Support your answers with reference to decided cases. An acceptance must be communicated for it to be effective and valid. The mental assent of both parties is not required but the external manifestation should exist. The acceptor must dos something in order to notify his acceptance. For example‚ he should communicate his acceptance of the offeror. This can be illustrated
Premium Contract Plaintiff
advertisement regarding the job of the PR officer. We may dismiss it as an offer and instead it should be merely an invitation to treat. This was established in the case of Patridge v Crittendon. This is also not similar to the facts of Carlill v Carbolic as there was a promise in return of an award for an act. The second issue would be whether there was an offer made by Jim when he called during the lunch break to mention that he was keen on joining. This may not actually amount to an offer as it
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Contract law
be made while the offer is still in existence. It must be made by a person whom the offer was addressed. If the offer is intended to be made to any person that learns of it then any such person can accept the offer on the stated terms. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256‚ where Carlill had read an advertisement offering a reward to anyone who caught influenza after buying the company’s smoke ball. Carlill bought the ball and caught influenza‚ since the offer was made to ‘the world at
Premium Contract
Name: 1 GCSE HISTORY YOUR EXAM IS ON…….. Tuesday 14th June P.M. Paper 2 Health and Medicine. Health and Medicine c 1345 onwards. Study guides and useful websites. 1. You can buy a full colour CGP guide from us for £ 2.75 2. BBC Bitesize is useful but make sure you select the correct topics. 3. Twilight revision sessions every Wednesday or Thursday in M59 from the end of February until the exams in June. Special equipment. You need a decent black (fine tip) pen. Get a highlighter
Premium 2nd millennium Medicine Middle Ages
Offer and acceptance | Contract law | Part of the common law series | Contract formation | Offer and acceptance · Mailbox rule Mirror image rule · Invitation to treat Firm offer · Consideration | Defenses against formation | Lack of capacity Duress · Undue influence Illusory promise · Statute of frauds Non est factum | Contract interpretation | Parol evidence rule Contract of adhesion Integration clause Contra proferentem | Excuses for non-performance | Mistake · Misrepresentation
Premium Contract
Intention: Non-commercial agreements:1.Where the agreement between the parties is of a non-commercial nature‚ it is presumed that the parties do not intend to create legal relations (Balfour v Balfour). Where the agreement between the parties is of a commercial nature‚ it is presumed that the parties do intend to create legal relations(Balfour v Balfour). The presumption in social arrangements is that there is no intention to create legal relations(Edwards v Skyways Ltd)..(Social agreements in friends/acquaintances
Premium Contract