described by: Q = 5000 - 200P Firm 1 has a unit cost of production c1 equal to 6 whereas firm 2 has a higher unit cost of production c2 equal to 10. a. What is the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium outcome? b. What are the profits for each firm? c. Is this outcome efficient? Answer: (a) At equilibrium‚ assuming that if both firms charge the same price‚ then the firms split the market evenly. (b) The higher cost firm makes zero profit‚ whereas the lower cost firm’s profit is (c) No‚
Premium Supply and demand Competition Economics
Business School (CBS) School of Information Systems Unit Outline 10830 Business Information Systems 100 Semester 2‚ 2014 Unit study package number: 10830 Mode of study: Internal Tuition pattern summary: Lecture: 1 x 1.5 Hours Computer Laboratory: 1 x 1.5 Hours This unit does not have a fieldwork component. Credit Value: 25.0 Pre-requisite units: Nil Co-requisite units: Nil Anti-requisite units: Nil Result type: Grade/Mark Approved incidental
Premium Assessment Learning Skill
Nike‚ Inc.: Cost of Capital Case 15 Financial Administration FINC 5713-180 Team 1 Fall 2013. October 8‚ 2013. Introduction Kimi Ford a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group which is a mutual-fund management firm‚ is considering to buy some shares from Nike‚ inc even if it’s share price had declined from the beginning of the year‚ for the Northpoint Large-cap fund she managed which invested mostly in Fortune 500 companies and it was doing well despite the decline
Premium Stock market Weighted average cost of capital Stock
Integrated Case 3-16 D¡¦Leon Inc.‚ Part I Financial Statements and Taxes Donna Jamison‚ a 2000 graduate of the University of Florida with 4 years of banking experience‚ was recently brought in as assistant to the chairman of the board of D¡¦Leon Inc.‚ a small food producer that operates in north Florida and whose specialty is high-quality pecan and other nut products sold in the snack-foods market. D¡¦Leon¡¦s president‚ Al Watkins‚ decided in 2004 to undertake a major expansion and to ¡§go
Premium Balance sheet Depreciation Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Nike‚ Inc Cost of Capital NorthPoint Large Cap Fund was considering whether to buy Nike’s stock or not. Nike was experiencing declines in sales growth‚ declines in profits and market share. However‚ Nike decided it would increase exposure in mid-price footwear and apparel lines‚ and it also commits to cut down expenses. The market responded with mixed signals to Nike’s changes. Kimi Ford‚ the portfolio manager at NorthPoint‚ did a cash flow estimation‚ and ask her assistant‚ Joanna Cohen to estimate
Premium Financial markets Investment Mathematics
School Sport Standard Note: SN/SP/6052 Last updated: 24 May 2012 Author: John Bardens‚ Robert Long and Christine Gillie Section Social Policy Section The purpose of this note is to outline the current debate about the provision of sport and Physical Education (PE) in schools and to highlight recent policy developments and commentary in this area. The note relates to England only. Since the Secretary of State for Education’s October 2010 statement‚ calling for a new direction
Premium Olympic Games High school Primary education
this report we focus on Nike’s Inc. Cost of Capital and its financial importance for the company and future investors. The management of Nike Inc. addresses issues both on top-line growth and operating performance. The company’s cost of capital is a critical element in such decisions and it is important to estimate precisely the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). In our analysis‚ we examine why WACC is important in decision making and we show how WACC for Nike Inc. is calculated correctly. Also
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Arithmetic mean Mathematics
Max Leonard‚ Vice President of Marketing for Dysk Compyer‚ Inc must decide whether to introduce a mid-priced 2 version of the firm’s DC6900 minicomputer product line-the DC6900-X minicomputer. The DC6900-X would sell for $ 3900‚ 3 with unit variable costs of $ 1‚800. Projections made by an independent marketing research firm indicate that the DC6900-X 4 would achieve a sales volume of 500‚000 units next year‚ in its first year of commercialization. One-half of the first
Premium Variable cost Marketing Costs
Finance | | | | | | | | | | Course Project - Part 1 - Task 1: Assessing loan options for AirJet Best Parts‚ Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Question 1: | APR (given) | EAR (calc) | | 2nd ICONV | | | | | | National First | 3.25 + 6.75 = 10% | 10.25 | | NOM = 10% | | | | | | | | | | C/Y = 2 (semiannual) | | | | | | | | | | EFF = 10.2500 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Regions Best
Premium Stock Stock market Bond
Nike Inc.: Cost of Capital The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is the overall required rate of return on a firm as a whole. It is important to calculate a firm’s cost of capital in order to determine the feasibility of a particular investment for a firm. I do not agree with Joanna Cohen’s WACC calculation. She calculated value of equity‚ value of debt‚ cost of equity‚ and cost of debt all incorrectly. For value of equity‚ Joanna simply used the number stated on the balance sheet instead
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Dividend yield Investment