policies‚ they have already entered products close to those already available in India such as carbonated waters and fruit drinks. For promotional activities‚ Pepsi has a sponsorship at Navrati‚ a TV campaign using sports and celebrities while Coca-Cola has events and lifestyle focus such as vacations giveaways. For pricing policies‚ Pepsi uses an aggressive pricing policy to get immediate market share from Indian competitors while Coca-Cola have huge reductions up to 15-25%. For distribution arrangements
Premium Marketing Coca-Cola Carbonation
October 15‚ 2014 Case Analysis – Case#16 Coke and Pepsi in India: Issues‚ Ethics‚ and Crisis Management Introduction This case delves into whether or not Pepsi and Coke are equal targets in India. It questions whether the companies are doing their ethical duties‚ as well as whether they are managing crises and stakeholders well. The Real Problem The real problem is whether or not these companies are doing their duties to their stakeholders and to the host countries (in this case India) based on
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Corporation
Mohamed Saada. Coke vs. Pepsi War Overview: In 1985 Coke has introduced a new Coke product replacing its old Coke Formula that has been around for almost 100 years. The reaction has been outrageous by the consumers who resisted the new Coke forcing the company to go back in its decision and sell the two products together. My opinion is that the mistake was partially being a wrong strategic call and partially a mistake in interpreting the market research date. On the strategic call‚ Coke was losing
Premium Qualitative research Marketing Brand
Additionally‚ because of Pepsico’s failure to live up to some of its promises to improve the economy as part of it being allowed to conduct business in India‚ Pepsico and other MNCs developed a reputation as organizations that cannot be trusted (Pepsi ’s entry into India‚ 2009). Pepsico and Coca-Cola were well aware of the challenges present when attempting to enter emerging markets‚ and they enjoyed several years of increased market share and increased revenues prior to 2003. Major Overriding
Premium Stakeholder analysis Stakeholder Multinational corporation
YOFFIE tC Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century For over a century‚ Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60-billion industry in the United States‚ where the average American consumed 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a “carefully waged competitive struggle‚” from 1975 to 1995 both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual growth of around
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
PEPSI: REFRESH EVERYTHING CAMPAGIN By: Lorraine Reynolds March 12th 2015 GSCBC21: Effectve PR Professor Jonas LJUNGGREN PEPSI: REFRESH EVERYTHING CAMPAGIN The Pepsi Refresh Project (PRP) was a new campaign launched by Pepsi Co. It was a campaign where Pepsi asked consumers to come up with different ideas on how to improve aspects of their local communities based on four categories – arts‚ music‚ education and communities. There was also an extra Pepsi Challenge where they would post a question
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Super Bowl
have been travel with EVA Airways most of the time when we have to travel to other countries. Nevertheless‚ I was not the one who chose the airlines but my parents did. There are many other choices but why EVA Airways. I was wondering the reasons behind it. Moreover‚ I am interesting in working under EVA Airways after graduation. Therefore‚ I would like to know more about this company in more detail for future benefits when applying for the job at EVA Airways. Background EVA Airways is a Taiwan based
Premium Airline US Airways Low-cost carrier
Cory Wells Coke and Pepsi Case Coke and Pepsi have been long time rivals with competition being the name of the game in their industry. Historically‚ the soft drink industry has been so profitable because Americans tend to love soft drinks‚ more than any other beverages out there. Americans soda consumption grew by an average of 3% a year since 1970. Coke and Pepsi had an average annual growth of 10% from 1975 to 1995. Not to mention‚ the internal rivalry
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
cola giants‚ Pepsi and Coke‚ entered the Indian market‚ they brought with them the cola wars that had become part of global folklore. This case study details the various battles fought in India by the two rivals with its focus on the publicity campaigns where the two sought to steal each other fizz. The case also outlines battles fought on other fronts - conflicts with bottles‚ product modifications‚ attempts to steal the rival’s employees and other mini wars. On the whole‚ the case attempts
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing Pepsi
The Coca Cola Company: Diversity and a Global Presence You do the Research: 1. I don’t think that Coke can stay up with changing tastes for non-cola drinks. I believe that Goizueta did have the right idea to develop new products‚ but Coke fell behind after some embarrassing problems within the company‚ such as the 1999 contamination scare‚ their slowing unit growth‚ ugly class action racial discrimination suit (which result in a $195.2 million settlement with 2000 employees)‚ and an aborted
Premium Coca-Cola Gatorade Caffeine