Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley 1.360º Performance Evaluation System Overview 360 º performance evaluation system is a multi source feedback model for evaluating the performance of the employees within a company. The main purpose of this system is to develop the employees‚ not to use it for the administrative purposes as promotion‚ firing‚ and compensation package. The feedback is received from the direct manager‚ customers‚ peers and subordinates. Also‚ the self-evaluation of the employee is taken
Premium
From our previous analysis we concluded that It was the wisest choice to promote Parson. However it is obvious that this sensitive case may bring some problems in the near future. In the first place we have to analyze again who Parson is‚ the type of person he is and his personality. Then we have to agree on the path the company wish to take concerning it’s culture and it’s system of values. Parson is a type C personality‚ he is highly active and efficient‚ but lacks some belonging feelings
Premium Motivation Feedback Psychology
Management of People at Work Rob Parson Case Study 1 Case Overview The internal environment at Morgan Stanley was one of teamwork‚ employee development‚ dignity and respect. Morgan Stanley had developed a way of building consensus rather that individualism. Rob Parson was thrust into this environment – not sure of what was expected of him and with only one objective in mind – improving the performance of the Capital Markets division. He went about doing this ruthlessly without much care about
Premium Motivation Morgan Stanley Feedback
Rob Parson’s Promotion Paul Nasr made the right decision recruited Rob Parson‚ due to his character for being energetic and he has great entrepreneurship. Not only that‚ Rob Parson is the right person that is able to catalyst and help Morgan Stanley’s future business performance. Rob Parson is able to deliver and satisfy clients demand in excellent manner‚ resulting he has generated major business deal for the firm. Clients love him; they always look forward to appoint him for dinner whenever they
Premium Negative feedback Negative feedback Feedback
Case - Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley Q 1. What is your assessment of Parson’s performance? Should Parson be promoted? Parson equipped with ten years of work experience and networking skills was skeptical when he first got the invitation to join Morgan Stanley. He felt that he did not fit into the typical crowd. Our assessment of his strengths and weaknesses as mentioned in the table below. STRENGHTS WEAKNESSES Strong selling skills Lacks team player abilities Excellent networking capabilities
Premium Management Morgan Stanley Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Rob Parson The problem with Rob’s promotion is a recurring one‚ especially in professional services firms and it refers to performance evaluation and more broadly to talent management. Should a person that substantially exceeds expectations in certain skills but significantly lacks other skills‚ be promoted by virtue of the fact that the first can somehow off-set the latter? There is no doubt that Rob is a star in his position at Morgan Stanley. Businesswise‚ he has a proven track record and
Premium Management Leadership Strategic management
CASE STUDY – ROB PARSON AT MORGAN STANLEY At Morgan Stanley‚ an investment bank‚ its mission or vision statement clearly defines what it values as an organization- “exceptional performance‚ absolute integrity‚ teamwork‚ innovation‚ dignity and respect towards others” Evaluation summary : Strengths Development areas Comments / views Strengths Excellent selling Highly Aggressive Professional drive Perseverance Resourcefulness Knowledge of Markets High on initiative
Premium Motivation
CASE STUDY Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) 1. Background Morgan Stanley (MS) a leading U.S. investment bank since its inception in 1935‚ was in the midst of an organizational renewal. Our goal is to be the world’s best investment bank and the Firm of choice for clients‚ people‚ our shareholders. People: Source of competitive advantage Environment: foster teamwork‚ innovation‚ effectively co-ordinate work across the firm. Capital Markets Services Division (CMS) serve as a link between the
Premium Financial services Bank Morgan Stanley
main focus of this essay is to present an analysis on Morgan Stanley’s business condition and troubles they were facing in the past and to provide solutions to solve their struggle. First‚ we will evaluate Morgan Stanley’s business by using the Porter’s 5 Competitive Forces Model. Then‚ we will illustrate the changes in the firm’s value chain before and after June 2005 by using the Value Chain Model. More than that‚ we will also analyze Morgan Stanley’s business by using the Management‚ Organization
Premium Financial services Morgan Stanley
Why did Morgan Stanley underinvest in information technology? Morgan Stanley underinvest in information technology because the firm focused its business strategy on maximizing profits instead of generating revenue since the stock market crashed in 2001. To gain the maximizing profit‚ the company cut costs in many aspects including the investment of information technology. 2. Why was the merger with Dean Witter disruptive for the company? Because Morgan Stanley and Dean Witter
Premium Strategic management Morgan Stanley Information technology