References: “Gary Habermas.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Habermas (Accessed November 7th‚ 2011). Habermas‚ Gary R. 1990. “Dealing with Doubt.” Moody Press. Chicago. http://www.garyhabermas.com/books/dealing_with_doubt/dealing_with_doubt.htm (accessed 11-7-2011). Habermas‚ Gary R. 1990. “Jesus’ Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic. Part 2.” Criswell Theological Review.
Premium Jesus Resurrection of Jesus Christianity
of perception. One of his arguments for the real distinction of mind from body also held clear and distinct perception. This is the Argument of Doubt. While Descartes is unsure of the true existence of his body‚ he cannot doubt that his mind does indeed exist as he is a thinking thing doubting his very own existence. Therefore‚ through this certainty‚ Descartes says that he‚ an existing substance is not the same as his body as it does not exist. However‚ this is clearly not a valid argument
Premium
external world scepticism. There are many different kinds of scepticism. This essay will focus mainly on Cartesian Scepticism thusly called because of the doubt raised by Descartes in his method of doubt which I will allude to later. Scepticism arguments appear in many different forms and argue different points‚ i.e. infallibility‚ certainty. The following is a sceptic’s argument for infallibility: 1) If you know something‚ then you can’t be wrong about it. 2) You can always be wrong about
Premium
Kaelin Davis 10/17/14 Theology paper Professor Doyle It is fair for Elie Wiesel to question God’s goodness because the horrible events during the Holocaust led many Jews to understandably question God and their doubt faith in him. Elie Wiesel‚ one of those many Jews expressed his doubt in God in his work Night. Wiesel does an amazing job of describing the horrendous incidents that took place during the Holocaust. Elie goes from being very religious to being very angry and doubtful because of the
Premium Elie Wiesel God Atheism
“With the letter‚ something elemental‚ brutal‚ perhaps even criminal had been introduced‚ some principle of darkness‚ and even in her excitement over the possibilities‚ she did not doubt that her sister was in some way threatened and would need her help” (106). Briony is clearly deeply affected by the contents of this letter. “That the word had been written by a man confessing to an image in his mind‚ confiding a lonely preoccupation
Premium Fiction Literature Character
reasonable doubt that this was his idea‚ he may end up in worse shape after the legal fees and time missed for court. He may be better off not pursuing legal action. As stated above‚ this was a difficult decision. How far do we take the idea that we are not to pursue legal action or compensation? What about cases such as being in a car accident? Should we not pursue compensation for damages? While I may not be able to answer this question myself‚ one thing I can say with certainty is that the
Premium Forgiveness Law Pleading
existence of an object is not necessarily associated with the sense-data as different people receive different sense-data when they are under the belief that they are viewing the same object (Russell 20). In addition‚ a person would only know the certainty of perceived sense-data rather than of the object since sense-data depends on the perception and relation of the object to the perceiver (Russell 16). Russell then states that although there is no proof of a physical world‚ the belief that there
Premium Mind Epistemology Ontology
The Victorian age (1832-19019: GENERAL FEATURES The 1832 Great Reform Bill is generally taken as the watershed between the Romantic Age and the so-called Victorian Age. The age that was taking shape in those years and that ended at the beginning of our century was much less homogeneous than it may appear at a superficial analysis. It was an age of extremes and contradictions under a surface of balance and respectability. The key-ideas that intersected in the seventy years of Queen Victoria’s
Premium Victorian era Charles Darwin Victorian literature
Additionally‚ I could not have put the sum of the angles to equal 180 degrees. Therefore‚ whether I want this axiom or if I ever thought of it previously or imaged it‚ they necessarily exist. According to Descartes‚ this proves beyond any possibility of doubt that the sum of the angles of 180 degrees could not have been invented‚ but instead it pertains to the nature of a triangle that was not invented by me or in my
Premium Metaphysics Mind Ontology
those who have deceived us‚ even if only once’. The reason why this doubt is universal is that senses give no way to distinguish a true from a false perception. Descartes is not saying here that the senses are wrong‚ but simply that we cannot be certain that everything they tell us is correct. Having realised that our senses deceive us and so we cannot trust them‚ Descartes immediately raises an objection: if it is reasonable to doubt what the senses tell us about those things that they perceive only
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind