The idea of utilitarianism classifies actions of being "morally" right or wrong solely based on the results and outcomes of the actions. This paper will analyze the problem that Arthur‚ "the art dealer"‚ faces with artwork pieces he stumbles upon. Arthur’s predicament is that he is given an opportunity to buy looted artworks. His dilemma is to either purchase or to not purchase the art work. This paper will evaluate the two analysis views of a utilitarian: act (extreme) and rule (restricted). First
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
chosen Act-Utilitarianism to analyze in this paper. My assertion is that Act-Utilitarianism is not a viable solution to the problem of punishment. I believe this because Act-Utilitarianism‚ while attempting to maximize overall utility‚ often leads to situations where the wrong answers are given to moral questions. This results in Act-Utilitarianism finding justification for punishment in bad moral theories‚ thus invalidating any justification given. While I do not believe that Act-Utilitarianism is an
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
Explain the differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism Since it began‚ there have been two main exponents of Utilitarianism. They are Jeremy Bentham and J S Mill‚ and both of them base their own individual theories on the principle of utility‚ which defines something (an act‚ etc) dependent on if it achieves "the greatest happiness for the greatest number". This makes Utilitarianism a relativistic and consequentialist argument‚ as it takes into account only the outcome of events rather than
Free Utilitarianism
This shows that love can be impractical as it may not take into account justice alongside love. However‚ Joseph Fletcher who devised situation ethics used a working principle which stated ‘Love and Justice are the same‚ for justice is love distributed nothing else. In this case of the rapist being punished‚ there would still be justice. However‚ it would be served with love. Therefore‚ the conclusion may
Premium Love Marriage Jury
compassion‚ caring‚ self-discipline‚ hard work‚ responsibility‚ intelligence‚ and honesty. I could go on and on with the characteristics that describe nursing. I believe in Christian values and attach them to nursing. I think of the words of Jesus and the Bible when taking care of patients; “And as you wish that others would do to you‚ do so to them” (Luke 6:31). The Bible is a great source of strength and rules to live by for me. Because of this‚ I chose Watson’s Theory of Transpersonal Caring. Jean Watson’s
Premium Nursing Florence Nightingale Nurse
Act Utilitarianism vs Rule Utilitarianism Our world is governed by rules‚ either implied or implemented‚ and early on we are taught to live by these rules. Society expects us to act in such a way that will conform to these rules in order to live happy‚ harmonious lives. We do things‚ careful not to break any of the rules that might hurt or cause harm to others. Sometimes though‚ we do things not in accordance with the rules but based on what we feel is the right thing to do. Some people believe
Premium
CAFS STUDY NOTES PARENTING AND CARING Becoming parents and carers Being a parent or carer is one of the most demanding jobs there is. No one can make parenting or caring easy‚ but by understanding children‚ the cared for and their needs will make it a lot easier‚ as they require time and energy. Biological parents Biological parents are the parents who produce and provide the genetic material for a child. Pregnancy Pregnancy is the result of male and female intercourse or due to artificial
Free Family Parent Adoption
“JOY OF CARING AND SHARING” Sharing‚ taking‚ earning‚ losing‚ stealing‚ squandering‚ hoarding. These are all human impulses‚ and very natural otherwise we wouldn’t be human without them. Yet on this list only one item — sharing — appears in the world’s wisdom traditions. Why is giving or sharing set apart? After all‚ there’s no mystery to why someone might want to earn‚ hoard‚ squander‚ or steal a million dollars. One way or another‚ most of our daily actions follow the principle of more is better
Premium Happiness Lebanon, Tennessee
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that holds‚ that an action is right if it produces‚ or if it tends to produce‚ the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people affected by the action‚ otherwise the action is wrong" (DeGeorge‚ 44). The utilitarian approach assesses each action separately and the effects that arise from it. Act utilitarianism‚ the most common form used in many circumstances‚ looks at the consequences of each individual act and calculate utility each time the act
Premium Utilitarianism Business ethics Ethics
The prominant criticism of Utilitarianism is that it is extremely hard to predict the results of an action. The outcomes of all situations are hard to predict‚ so how can we possibly apply the rule of the greatest happiness for the greatest number if we do not know who will benefit most? It is also difficult to decide whether an outcome is morally good or bad. People have contrasting opinions on what they think is right or wrong and it depends on the individual who is making the decision. This causes
Premium Time Utilitarianism Decision making