ARGUMENT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Title of Article: Debilitating Effects of TV on Children Author: Dr. John M. Grohol The main purpose of this article is to convince the reader of the negative consequences of television being watched by our younger generation. Not just the quantity but the quality as well. It is too also show how parents fail to monitor what they allow their children to watch on television. It also shows how their developing minds are absorbing what they see and hear and television
Premium Television Developmental psychology Learning
A solid argument consists of a claim‚ reasons/evidence and conclusion. “Reasons are beliefs‚ evidence‚ metaphors‚ analogies‚ and other statements offered to support or justify conclusions. When a writer has a conclusion she wants you to accept‚ she must present reasons to persuade you that she is right and show you why. You cannot determine the worth of a conclusion until you identify the reasons” (Browne & Keeley‚ 2012‚ p.28). Absent reasons or conclusion the argument is weak‚ unclear‚ pointless
Free Reasoning Logic Analogy
Torture is‚ for the needs of this writing‚ defined as: “the intentional infliction of extreme physical [or mental] suffering on some non-consenting‚ defenceless‚ other person for the purpose of breaking their will”‚ (Miller‚ S. n.d.). Morality‚ as portrayed by Chazelle‚ is the difference between right and wrong. Ethical codes are used to transform moral judgment or intuition into a decision around action‚ (Chazelle‚ B. 2009). The laws surrounding torture‚ within the human
Premium Torture Human rights Morality
What is a slippery slope argument? Critically discuss the use of such arguments in one area of biomedical ethical controversy. The slippery slope argument is amongst the strongest voiced and possibly the most emotive of arguments in opposition to legalising voluntary active euthanasia (VAE‚ the act of accelerating the death of another‚ usually by lethal injection‚ for their own good and with their consent). In fact‚ in discussion on practically any change in social policy it is common place
Premium Death Suicide Euthanasia
Insalaco 1 Jared Insalaco Mrs. Smith English 11 4 April‚ 2015 An Argument for Capital Punishment Capital punishment has been around since the beginning of history. It can be dated all the way back to a part of Hammurabi ’s code‚ one of the earliest records of written law‚ that states: “If any one steals the minor son of another‚ he shall be put to death” (EAWC Anthology). That is just one instance of capital punishment‚ but there are many more. Almost all ancient civilizations had some form of
Premium Murder
that these two arguments each have the same logical pattern or form: If A then B. A. Therefore‚ B. This pattern‚ as we have seen‚ is called modus ponens. Arguments with this pattern consist of one conditional premise‚ a second premise that asserts as true the antecedent (the if part) of the conditional‚ and a conclusion that asserts as true the consequent (the then part) of the conditional. Other common varieties of hypothetical syllogisms include • chain argument • modus
Free Logic
Critical Argument Analysis - Fantasy Violence Laura Salter ENG/215 – Effective Academic Writing November 16‚ 2011 Critical Argument Analysis - Fantasy Violence Children’s programming has been a bone of contention for a very long time. As a parent and a grandparent‚ the article from this week that caught my attention was “Bang‚ You’re Dead” by Sara Rimensnyder. Since my daughter was young in the 1980’s‚ I have worried about the declining quality of children’s programming and the possible
Premium Violence Mass media Aggression
Summary and Critique of Argument In “if you assign my book don’t censor it’’ published in Kernersville‚ N.C on November 28‚ 1999‚ Mark Mathabane argues the high school that assign his novel ‘’Kaffir Boy’’ should not censor chunks of his book that contributes to the meaning of the novel. This novel is about Mathabanes childhood‚ living in Africa during the during the apartheid period. There is mature scene and language in this novel that parents would disagree with‚ but all with reason and purpose
Premium Rhetoric The Reader Peer group
I can safely say your arguments are flawed and you resort to name-calling and insults instead of providing evidence for claims‚ Yes you can safely say there is a little green man called Jeff who rules your life too‚ that’s because you are a new atheist isn’t it. Now what you must understand is when debating with me I do not take atheistic statements as statements of fact‚ but as statements of an ideology. I have given the evidence it’s just an attempt was made to refute it with talk of aliens
Premium Atheism 2008 singles
the founding fathers wrote a constitution the did not fit all Americans. The constitution was written for the white male. African Americans and women did not have these rights until later on in history. The question also is apparent in the abortion argument‚ Gary Bauer a prominent figure in the Pro-life movement fights to say unborn fetuses are people. The meaning of a person and who deserve constitutional is expanding. In history it wasn’t always so easy and people had to fight for their
Premium George W. Bush President of the United States Supreme Court of the United States