customer” (Harvard Business School. 1997‚ pg. 1). Mr. McGaran is an exceptional manager and his performance exceeds expectations with the exception of customer satisfaction. Mr. McGaran scored “below par” on customer satisfaction. It a must Mr. McGaran take correction actions to improve customer satisfaction in his division to bring his rating above par. Describe the approach you would take in your performance feedback session with James. What would you say‚ in what sequence would you say it‚ and what
Premium Customer service Customer Harvard Business School
OBJECTIVES * One of the major objectives of the case is that Citibank has aligned its new performance evaluation process to inculcate non financial measures in the performance evaluation and thereby highlighting the importance of diverse set of measures for evaluating performance it has been a year since the California division has introduced this change through a new performance scorecard and Citibank has to make sure that the change is communicated throughout the organisation. * The Citibank
Premium Management Strategic management Balanced scorecard
Signature:…………………… Date:………… Background The case discuses about the evaluation of performance of James McGaran‚ Branch Manager of Citibank in Los Angeles by his Area Manager‚ Lisa Johnson‚ and the discrepancies that crept in during the evaluation process. In the case‚ it can be seen how Lisa Johnson had failed to reflect some of the performances properly leading to a stalemate position in the performance evaluation of an efficient manager like James McGaran. James McGaran was a branch manager
Premium Balanced scorecard Business terms Management
Portfolio Performance evaluation & Analysis Portfolio Management(F-407) Submitted to: Pallabi Siddiqua Assistant Professor Department of Finance Faculty of Business Studies University of Dhaka Submitted by: Gazi Afsana Roll: 15-252 4th year 2nd Semester Department of Finance Faculty of Business Studies University of Dhaka Date of submission: January 13‚ 2013. Letter of transmittal Date Mrs. Pollobi siddiqua Lecturer‚ Department Of Finance‚ University
Premium Investment Financial markets
current evaluation form is inadequate and does not provide a complete picture of employee’s performance. The current evaluation method only focuses on personal characteristics of the employee being evaluated. Another problem with the current method is that only the plant manager evaluates the employee‚ without getting input from the individual being evaluated or anyone else. Furthermore the evaluation method currently being used focuses on perceptions and does not evaluate performance materials
Premium Employment Evaluation Human resource management
Statement of the ProblemThe California Division of Citibank has introduced a new performance scorecard to highlight the importance of a diverse set of measures in achieving the strategic goals of the division. Among the new measures introduced was a customer satisfaction indicator. Unfortunately‚ James McGaran‚ the manager of the most important branch and who consistently delivers impressive financial results scored "below par" on customer satisfaction. Frits Seeger‚ President of Citibank California
Premium Finance Customer Customer service
Citibank : Performance Evaluation “Performance management is about creating relationships and ensuring i l i hi d i effective communication Its about focusing on what organisations‚ managers and team members need to dt b dt succeed” - Robert Bacal Performance Management Why do even best of great strategies fail? A study of 275 professional portfolio managers reported that the ability to execute strategy was more important than the quality of the strategy itself (“Measures That Matter‚”
Premium Strategy Strategic planning Management
1. Evaluation of Safety Performance Can safety performance be assessed and evaluated? If so‚ how? Are there any benefits and issues associated with the assessment and evaluation of Health & Safety performance? Theory The HSE want the assessing of health and safety performance to be of equivalent importance to the measurement of financial‚ production or service delivery management. HSE ask companies to follow the HSG 65 procedure (fig1). This diagram highlights where the
Premium Management Occupational safety and health Safety
THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS A. SUPERVISORS SHOULD: 1. Translate organizational goals into individual job objectives and requirements. 2. Communicate their expectations regarding staff performance. 3. Provide feedback to staff. 4. Coach the staff on how to achieve job objectives and requirements. 5. Diagnose the staff’s relative strengths and weaknesses. 6. Determine a development plan for improving job performance and
Premium Evaluation Behavior Human behavior
Performance Appraisal for Teams Agencies are required by the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 to establish program goals and report organizational performance to stakeholders‚ including the Office of Management and Budget and the Congress. This creates pressure to use methods that improve organizational performance and maximize goal achievement. Using teams to accomplish the work— and effectively managing team performance— is one of the methods that many organizations have chosen.
Premium Management Goal