CONTRACT – REMEDIES (Pg 183) Damages |Damages is the principal common law remedy for a breach of contract. It refers to the monetary compensation payable by the defaulting party. | |Assessment |Aim of unliquidated damages | | |The general principle of assessment is that the injured party is to be placed in the same financial position he
Premium Contract law Contract Breach of contract
Charlie is going to rescind the contract. He demands return of his money and compensation for the loss of commission on several high profile sales of his business. He wants to rescind the contract because the package of software recommend by Carmine was obsolete‚ despite Carmine’s assurances. This problem is concerned with the contents of the contract which is term in the contract‚ the misrepresentation and unconscionable conduct. Charlie will claim that Carmine verbal assurances about the
Premium Contract Contract law Misrepresentation
Business Law Tutorial 11 1. [ Refer notes - creation of agency ] 2. [ Refer notes - Duties of Agent to Principal ] 3. [ Refer notes - Duties of Principal to his Agent ] 4. 4 remedies available: Principal may repudiate the contract - Section 168 Contracts Act‚ 1950 Principal may recover the bribe from agent - Section 169 Contracts Act‚ 1950 Principal may refuse to pay commission to Agent Principal may dismiss agent for breach of duty 5. [ Refer notes - Termination
Premium Breach of contract Contract law Contract
TORT‚ PRODUCT LIABILITY‚ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY‚ CRIMINAL and PROPERTY LAW CASE ANALYSIS TORT CASE OVERVIEW LEGAL ASPECTS 535 PROFESSOR T. RICE MEMORANDUM TO: Professor T. Rice FROM: RE: Denny v. Ford Motor Company (Tort Law) FILE: Court of Appeals of New York‚ 1995 639 N.Y.S. 2d 250 DATE: April 6‚ 2014 Conclusion: Nancy Denny (Plaintiff) was driving her Ford Bronco II in June of 1986‚ when she slammed on the brakes to avoid hitting a deer that had walked in front of her vehicle
Premium Strict liability Tort Contract
Contract of Sale. By the contract of sale one of the contracting parties obligates himself to transfer the ownership of and to deliver a determinate thing and the other to pay therefore a price certain in money or its equivalent. |Contract of Sale |Contract to Sell | |Title over the property passes to the buyer upon delivery unless |Ownership is retained by the seller whether or not there is |
Premium Contract Contract law
intentions for the future. Provide Comfort‚ not assurance. (Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corporation Berhad [1981] Agreement- has been a valid offer and that it has been accepted. Manifestation by 2 or more persons to the substance of the contract. Would a reasonable person think an agreement had been entered. Can be shown by conduct. Does not have to be express words “I accept your offer” Offer: 1. Offers must be distinguished from an invitation to treat or request for information.
Premium Contract Contract law
Company. In this case Abu and Shell company signed a contract of 10 years on the basis of the statement by Shell company experts that the station would be able to sell 900 000 liters of petrol per year. The approximate amount was provided on the basis of being direct access to the service station from Main street. A decision made by the local council announced that there would be a change in the traffic dierect access ‚ Shell company continued the contract without any changes and maintained that sales would
Premium Contract Contract Contract law
C. THE UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977 The basic purpose of UCTA 1977 is to restrict the extent to which liability in a contract can be excluded for breach of contract and negligence‚ largely by reference to a reasonableness requirement‚ but in some cases by a specific prohibition. S.6(2) states that as against a person dealing as consumer‚ liability for breach of the obligations arising from ss.13‚ 14 or 15 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (seller’s implied undertakings as to conformity of goods with
Premium Management Contract Sale of Goods Act 1979
Reviewer in LawObli DIFFERENT KINDS OF OBLIGATIONS Pure obligation- is one which is not subject any condition and no specific date is mentioned for its fulfillment and is‚ therefore‚ immediately demandable. Conditional obligation- is one whose consequences are subject In one way or another to the fulfillment of a condition. Condition- is a future and uncertain event‚ upon the happening of which‚ the effectivity or extinguishment of an obligation subject to it depends. Future and uncertain-
Premium Law Time Contract law
9. Yes‚ Suzy and Fred have a valid contract. Fred provided an offer to Suzy and Suzy accepted it through phone call in words. However‚ there is one concern for Suzy in this contract. By the time the contract is effective‚ Fred is‚ under 18 years old‚ a minor. If Fred is not married and nor emancipated either‚ he has the legal right to void the contract without being treated as breaching duty. 10. a. Suzy and Wally have a unilateral contract. Suzy made a promise to pay $10‚000 in exchange for Wally
Premium Contract Contract law Common law