JUST ONE PRODUCT‚ WHICH ONE SHOULD IT BE‚ AND HOW SHOULD IT BE PRICED? For every single version‚ we have calculated the total contribution for each price that segments are willing to pay‚ and chosen the price that can maximize the total contribution. SELL ONLY "STUDENT" VERSION Price Segments unit cost Unit Contribution Seg. Dev. Costs Demand Total Contribution $200 Consultants $15 $185 $200‚000 $20‚000 $3‚500‚000 $175 Small business& Consultants $15 $160 $400
Premium Small business Business Contribution margin
Will 4 3 3 4 4 This project was challenging from the beginning. We had difficulty identifying what we were going to center our project around. Once we got going however we did get a lot of productive work done. I didn’t contribute a large direct contribution to the paper‚ but I did the introduction and conclusion portions. I also worked closely with Yibo and Bobby to structure their arguments in their portions of the paper. Bobby found my assistance very helpful and him and I constantly worked on revising
Premium English-language films Writing Work
Question 2. Ignoring your answer to question 1‚ if the plant were not built and AR-42 was shipped from Netherlands to the UK‚ what transfer price would be appropriate? Firstly‚ we need to analyze the decision by identifying the advantage and disadvantage of manufacturing more product in Netherlands. The advantage is Hollandsworth would not take any financial risk‚ no borrowing would be necessary. Also‚ Axeon Dutch operations would see benefits from a lower variable cost for the entire product produced
Premium Variable cost Cost Costs
$50 ‚ the Unit Contribution will be fixed to $ 35 (50-15) for all other segments‚ and for student segment‚ it will be $15.( (60% of 50) -15). Case 2 – only Commercial software – The optimal price should be taken as 225 as that covers all other categories except the students. Case 3 – only Industrial software – the price should be 600 as the incremental contribution below this segment is less than the segment development costs. Version | Optimal Price | Total Contribution | Net Total Contribution
Premium Contribution margin Cost Marketing
Assignment Cover Sheet Student Name: Student Number: School of Law and Business Charles Darwin University Casuarina NT 0909 Phone: (08) 8946 6830 KUSH. 272261 Unit Name: Unit Code: ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS PRBA007 Lecturers Name: ANNA COOSHNA Assessment Title ASSIGNMENT 2 Semester: Year: Assignment 2 1 2014 Due Date: Lodgment Date: Applied for Extension 02/11/2014 02/11/2014 NO Lodgment Locations: (refer to specific lodgment requirements as set out by the lecturer) DO NOT LODGE
Premium Variable cost Fixed cost Direct material price variance
with an 85% acceptance rate and 2. Fill data for 144 samples from the test line set to a 10.2oz fill rate. You asked me to use this data to‚ systematically‚ determine the optimal fill rate to minimize under filled bottles (<10oz) and maximize the contribution per case. According to the report provided to Cougar Consulting‚ the main problem Lorex faces when trying to determine an optimal fill rate for their product is to reduce the number of exceptions due to an under fill event. An under fill event
Premium Variable cost Costs Contribution margin
a list of authors and reviewers to help you in this ( Preparation for learning group 1 activity.docx) Given the timelines‚ it would be great if the initial contribution to your discussion thread could be done by 3rd Feb. All reviewers should have completed their contribution by 10th Feb to enable the initiator read through all the contributions ready for our session on 12th
Premium Relationship Feedback The Opportunity
DC6900-X DC6900-Omega DC6900-Alpha Total 15 16 Sales Price per Unit $ 3‚900 $ 5‚900 $ 2‚500 17 Unit Variable Cost $ 1‚800 $ 2‚200 $ 1‚200 18 Unit Contribution $ 2‚100 $ 3‚700 $ 1‚300 19 20 Case A (Do Not Introduce DC6900-X) 21 Number of Units sold 0 400‚000 600‚000 22 Total Contribution $ - $ 1‚480‚000‚000 $ 780‚000‚000 23 Total Fixed Costs $ - $ - $ - 24 Net Profit $ - $ 1‚480‚000‚000 $ 780‚000‚000 $ 2‚260‚000‚000 25 26 Case
Premium Variable cost Marketing Costs
11/6/12 Case Analy sis f or Alpen Bank Case Analysis: Alpen Bank The main issue that Alpen bank is facing is whether or not they should launch the credit card business in the Romania market and which group of target audience they should select while applying the launching strategy. Moreover‚ specifically to Carle‚ he needs to come up with a program from which‚ Alpen bank can generate at least €5 million in profit within 2 years. Moreover‚ clarified positioning strategy and customer segmentation
Premium Variable cost Costs Fixed cost
| Dobbie | Regular | 1 | 1 / 4.63 = 0.215983 | - | 2 | 1 / 4.63 = 0.215983 | - | 3 | 1 / 5.23 = 0.191205 | 1 / 5.23 = 0.191205 | 4 | 1 / 5.23 = 0.191205 | 1 / 5.23 = 0.191205 | 5 | 1 / 4.17 = 0.239808 | 1 / 4.17 = 0.239808 | Profit Contribution per Yard: Fabric | Manufactured (Variable cost –Selling Price) | Purchased (Selling Price – Purchase Price) | 1 | 0.99-0.66=0.33 | 0.99-0.80=0.19 | 2 | 0.86-0.55=0.31 | 0.86-0.70=0.16 | 3 | 1.10-0.49=0.61 | 1.10-0.60=0.50 | 4 | 1.24-0
Premium Contribution margin Economics Profit maximization