UNIVERSITY CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN | Table of Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgement Declaration 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Project Scope 3.1. The physical size of the campus (locations of buildings & departments) 3.2. The size‚ number of computer labs & number of computers (locations) 3.3. The number of staff and their categories 3.4. The faculties and the number of students 3.5. The Servers‚ Databases‚ & Applications 3.6. Further considerations included in the project scope‚ 4. Network Design
Premium University Campus Computer network
Ad-hoc Routing Protocols for Rural Public Safety Chad Bohannan‚ Li Zhang‚ Jian Tang‚ Richard S. Wolff‚ Shen Wan‚ Neeraj Gurdasani and Doug Galarus Abstract—In this paper‚ we explore the feasibility of using Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) for rural public safety. First‚ we discuss a QoS enhancement to a standard routing protocol‚ Dynamic Source Routing (DSR). By incorporating a new routing metric and the available bandwidth and delay estimation algorithms with DSR‚ we design a new routing protocol
Premium Routing protocol Routing
Collision-Free MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Muneeb Ali‚ Tashfeen Suleman‚ and Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science Department‚ LUMS {muneeb‚tashfeens‚zartash}@lums.edu.pk Abstract Mobility in wireless sensor networks poses unique challenges to the medium access control (MAC) protocol design. Previous MAC protocols for sensor networks assume static sensor nodes and focus on energyefficiency. In this paper‚ we present a mobilityadaptive‚ collision-free medium access control protocol (MMAC) for
Premium Wireless sensor network Sensor node Sensor
Differences between distance vector (RIP) and link-state (OSPF) routing protocols: The following are advantages of link-state routing protocols (OSPF): * Link-state protocols use cost metrics to choose paths through the network. The cost metric reflects the capacity of the links on those paths. * An LSA exchange is triggered by an event in the network instead of periodic updates. This speeds up the convergence process because there is no need to wait for a series of timers to expire
Premium Routing protocol Routing
Q1-1) Identify the five components of a data communications system. 1.Message. 2.Sender 3.Receiver. 4.Transmission medium. 5.Protocol. Q1-11) Why are protocols needed? To achieve end-to-end delivery of data. Q-17) Explain the difference between an Internet draft and a proposed standard? - An Internet draft is a working document (a work inprogress) with no official status and a six- month lifetime. - A proposed standard is elevated to draft standard
Premium Internet Protocol Suite OSI model Transmission Control Protocol
Ad Hoc Wireless Networks :Architectures and Protocols Description Appropriate for all communications engineering courses that cover ad hoc wireless network planning‚ design‚ deployment‚ or management. Ad hoc wireless networks bring together mobile devices without complex infrastructure‚ setup‚ or administration-and they have enormous commercial and military potential. Ad Hoc Wireless Networks: Architectures and Protocols is the first book to address every major issue related to their design
Premium Computer network Internet Wireless network
ADVANCE ROUTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FAST IP NETWORK RECOVERY Mini Project Report Submitted to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University‚ Hyderabad. In Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the Degree of Bachelor of Technology In Computer science and engineering By PENTA VENKATA MADHUSUDHANA RAO 096A1A0518 Under the Guidance of Mr. ERUKULLA AVINASH M.E
Premium Routing
NETWORK SECURITY WITH RFID SYSTEM AND CRYPTOGRAPHY ABSTRACT: Wireless communication is very common and widely applicable technique in communication field. In these field new techniques invented that is called RFID technique‚ in which object having RFID tags on them are being accessed in radio frequency region. Cryptography (method involves the both process “encryption” and “decryption”) is widely used in network system’s security. It is also the ancient method of encoding
Premium RFID
13 IP Routing—Configuring RIP‚ OSPF‚ BGP‚ and PBR Contents Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-6 Routing Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-6 Dynamic Routing Protocols Supported on the ProCurve Secure Router . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-7 How Routing Protocols Work . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premium Routing
Routing in MANETs: Proactive vs Reactive Chigbogu Samuel Nwanjah K1161430 Network Security Coursework Network and Information Security January/February 2012 K1161430@kingston.ac.uk‚ zacchybros@gmail.com Abstract – This report aims at presenting an evaluation of Proactive and Reactive routing protocols using some performance statistics as it applies to Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs). This report also presents an evaluation of these protocols based on the result of the simulations carried out as
Premium Routing protocol Routing Computer network