FINAL EXAMINATION M8A1 YOUR NAME HERE EXCELSIOR COLLEGE 1.Identify two types of ethics and explain their role in criminal justice organizations. Support your responses with resources. Ethics- A social‚ religious‚ or civil code of behavior considered correct especially that of a particular group‚ professional‚ or individual.” (Collins‚ 2003) Kenneth Peak asserts that there are two types of ethics; absolute and relative. When dealing with absolute ethics‚ Peak claims that there is no fluctuation
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
Criminal Investigation The Criminal Procedure and Investigation Principles of Investigation Shawntee Allen Liberty University Online CJUS 420 Professor Ryan Zuidema May 6‚ 2013 1 An individual studying in criminal investigation needs to know and understand the four main principles dealing with Criminal Investigation. Knowing when and how to apply the principles is also
Premium Police Crime Criminal law
"What is the evidence for evolution?" When Darwin first introduced the idea of evolution through natural selection in his on the Origin of species (1859)‚ he faced extensive doubt surrounding his ideas. This was mainly due to the fact that he did not have a substantial amount of knowledge on the idea of inheritance. Fast forward to the twentieth century when natural selection was explained through the use of Mendelian theories‚ the knowledge of genetics was finally beginning to form evidence for the
Premium Evolution
University Assignment # 2 Evidence-Based Policing Henry Hall Class Criminal Justice Due Date January 28‚ 2012 Professor: Jane Bruce Within my paper I will be discussing evidence- based policing and its goals. I will also talk about some of the advantages within the community dealing with evidence-based policing‚ and the disadvantages as well. I will give two examples where evidence- based policing has been used and the impact that it had on the outcome of the case. Evidence Base Policing‚ is a
Premium Police
EVIDENCE AS SUPPORTING THE REASON: In other arguments‚ evidence‚ rather than being the main reason‚ supports the reason in coming to some conclusion. Evidence usually refers to something seen‚ but evidence often refers to a collection of identical things that have been seen or heard‚ called data. “Statistical evidence” usually refers to the totaling of similar things or instances. In some arguments the evidence can support a reason or reasons that in turn support the conclusion. For instance:
Premium Theory Scientific method Science
AP PSYCHOLOGY CASE STUDY 5: GREEN RIVER KILLER I. DISCOVERY OF THE CRIMINAL On August 15‚ 1982‚ Robert Ainsworth stepped into his rubber raft and began his descent south down the Green River toward the outer edge of Seattle’s city limits. It was a trip he had made on many occasions. As he drifted slowly downstream‚ he noticed a middle-aged balding man standing by the riverbank and a second‚ younger man sitting in a nearby pickup truck. Ainsworth assumed that the men were out for a day’s
Premium Ted Bundy
Extracting DNA from Bananas In the Lab: Extracting DNA from Bananas‚ DNA was removed from bananas that had been blended with water in order to examine how DNA is seen from the naked eye. DNA stands for deoxyribonucleic acid‚ which is a nucleic acid that contains the sugar deoxyribose. DNA is made up of a series of monomers called nucleotides. Each nucleotide has three parts: a deoxyribose molecule‚ a phosphate group‚ and a nitrogenous base. In addition‚ there are four kinds of nitrogenous
Premium DNA
Does all evidences can be used to convict a person? Circumstantial evidence is an indirect evidence that relies on connection with a particular case‚ but can’t be used as a proving alone. People have different thought of should circumstantial evidence can be use to convict a person. In my opinion‚ circumstantial evidence should never use for declaration of guilt because of the following reason. First‚ it is not credible. Second‚ It does not contain any or non scientific analysis. Last but not least
Premium Crime Murder Capital punishment
testing arrestees for DNA. Mandatory DNA testing is reasonable and legal by all terms. (Mandatory DNA Testing Is Constitutional 2). However‚ many have started to question it. The fourth amendment goes over privacy and personal rights‚ including unreasonable searches and seizures. Sarah B. Berson quoted in her online article‚ “DNA helps law enforcement investigate and prosecute crime‚ but the new trend of preconviction DNA collection raises serious Fourth Amendment issues for the criminal justice community
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Law
DISCUSSION FORUM _ LESSON 4 1. Summarize the Federal Rules of Evidence in your own words. The Federal Rules of Evidence (F.R.E.) enacted in 1975 and replaced prior centuries of various and sundry judge made caselaw. The F.R.E. is a complex set of statutes or penal codes legislated with the intent of replacing unfair evidentiary submission and/or unnecessary expense and delay among the courts. The basic concept behind the F.R.E. is the need for a consistent and predictable federal rule set
Premium Evidence law