their job. If one of the players is not doing their job then the system is failing in their mission of seeking justice. If you had the choice to be a highly paid criminal defense attorney or a prosecutor with 1/3 of the defense attorney’s salary which would you chose? Explain. To be honest‚ if I had the money I will probably pay a criminal defense attorney to a prosecutor that is getting 1/3 of the defense attorney’s salary. I will just feel that the attorney will be able to give me a better defense
Premium Criminal law Lawyer Judge
Notably‚ it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas‚ the Supreme Court‚ the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott‚ 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court‚ nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas
Premium Supreme court Judge Court
A Study of Recent Development in the Grounds for Judicial Review: Where are we heading? BY LO HOI CHUN 03004864 Accounting Option An Honours Degree Project Submitted to the School of Business in Partial Fulfilment of the Graduation Requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Business Administration (Honours) Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong April 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am grateful to Mr.Barreira‚ Antonio J.‚ Associate Professor‚ Department of Accountancy and Law at
Free Common law Law Human rights
Racial Disparities in the U.S. Judicial System The United States has the largest documented incarceration rate in the world. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics at yearend 2012‚ approximately 6‚937‚600 offenders were under the supervision of adult correctional systems (2013). Of this number‚ more than 60% of the inmates in prison are minorities however; they make up only 37% of the United States population. Considering the trends in which minorities commit crimes‚ such broad statistics
Premium African American Crime Criminal justice
Essay #1 – Judicial Activism Do we need judicial activism to flesh out the vague phrases in the Constitution? This question is truly at the heart of the topic. Do we need judicial activism to protect our rights? What exactly are our rights? While this may seem like a silly or obvious question‚ it is vitally important in answering this question. How is a court‚ or a legislature‚ supposed to draw meaning from such vague phrases as “Due Process of law” or “equal protection” or even “free speech
Premium Law United States Constitution United States
preserve the neutrality of judges and govern overt manifestations of judicial preference‚ whilst also protecting the judiciary from condemnation following any decisions they make . In addition to the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act‚ a substantial degree of security of tenure and remuneration‚ for instance‚ reducing a sense of fear within the judiciary. Tenure prevents judges from being removed from office on the basis of their judicial decisions‚ allowing them to perform their duties independently without
Premium Law Judge Separation of powers
modern time and in the U.S. Why‚ you may ask. The U.S’ judicial system makes sure you know and have all of your rights‚ you get to choose between a jury trial or a bench trial‚ and you are innocent until proven guilty. If the jury or judge makes a mistake on your verdict you can always appeal. Although‚ I know that the U.S’ judicial system is not perfect but it is a pretty good one if you want to ensure justice. The first reason why the U.S’ judicial system helps ensure justice is that you know all of
Premium Crime Law Police
The use of judicial waivers and remand to adult court: Several types of transfer for youths from juvenile court to adult court‚ judicial waiver‚ statutory exclusion‚ and direct file exist and are utilized. According to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2010) judicial waiver is the most popular. "47 States and the District of Columbia provide judicial discretion to waive certain juveniles to criminal court. Thirty-seven States and the District of Columbia have one or more
Free Law Judge United States
Reasoning and Institutions Question 1: “in practice the doctrine of precedent does not constrain judicial decision-making; activist judges can always creatively interpret previous cases to reach the outcome they desire.” Discuss. Answer: In considering whether the doctrine of precedent constrain activist judges like Lord Denning in making their decision‚ we should first examine the English legal system and how judicial precedents operates. The lowest court of law in England and Wales‚ which
Premium Stare decisis Common law Precedent
’Judicial Method: activism versus formalism’ A new era has emerged from the societal and legal changes that have occurred in Australia. The age of Judicial activism has taken over the more traditional method of judicial formalism. Supporters of the latter’s concerns that it promotes power without responsibility‚ and blurs the separation of powers‚ however the supporters of the former agree that inevitable changes in society force the judiciary to acknowledge that judicial formalism is a method
Free Law Judge