NOTES OF CASES THECASEOF THE SLIPPERY EQUITY IN Re Vandervell’s Trusts (No. 2)‚’ Lord Denning M.R. said: “ (‘ Hard cases make bad law ’) is a maxim which is quite misleading. It should be deleted from our vocabulary. It comes to this: ‘Unjust decisions make good law’: whereas they do nothing of the kind. Every unjust decision is a reproach to the law or to the judge who administers it.”a Now that it has been decided that there is to be no appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal‚ it is worth
Premium Law Common law Criminal law
Chapter 14 Firms in Competitive Markets Multiple Choice 1. A FIRM HAS MARKET POWER IF IT CAN |a. |maximize profits. | |b. |minimize costs. | |c. |influence the market price of the good it sells. | |d. |hire as many
Premium Perfect competition Economics
involved in establishing medical standards of care based on facts of a single case rather than on the standards of the profession (King‚ p.1236-37). In a sense‚ the issue is approached from a semantic and factual rather than medical standpoint. Helling v. Carey is a good example of such a case which excited considerable comment in the medical and legal fields. In the final analysis the case is considered unique and controversial mainly because the court dismissed the standards of medical profession and
Premium Physician Medicine Supreme Court of the United States
BA/BA(Hons) Education and professional Development DIA0120 Introduction to Research and Academic Writing A Literature Review of the Development and Integration of 14-19 Vocational and Academic Pathways. Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………...Page 3 History of 14-19 Education…………………………………………………..Page 4 Academic/Vocational Education and Funding…………………………….Page 5 -8 Teaching‚ Learning and Inspection.........................................................Page 9-11 Employer
Premium Higher education Vocational education Further education
Opinion on the Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Case As the opinion delivered by Justice Stevens‚ the U.S. Supreme Court intended to answer the significant question in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue‚ Inc. (Mosley case) that “whether objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark is a requisite for relief under the 1996 Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)”. 1 Contrary to lower courts’ holdings‚ the Supreme Court stated in a unanimous decision that it is not enough to claim
Premium Trademark Property Supreme Court of the United States
A number of advocacy organizations have labeled Bill C-14 as being unconstitutional. For example‚ Peter Hogg‚ one of the foremost authorities of constitutional law in Canada‚ said that Bill C-14 is “inconsistent with last year’s landmark Carter decision‚ which struck down the ban on assisted dying as a violation of the charter right to life‚ liberty and security of the person.” (Bryden‚ 2016‚ p.1). In reply to the government’s argument of creating safeguards for assisted dying‚ he said that the law
Premium Law Palliative care Death
GSL 504 Module 2 Henry V and Leadership Deanna Cunningham Leaders in today’s work environment are faced with challenges that are similar to challenges faced in the past. Although technology has caused our challenges to be on a broader scale they still represent the same issues that have been faced for years regarding confidence in leadership and how to foster leadership. While in battle Henry V gave his soldiers the freedom of choice to fight with him or if they had the desire to leave
Premium Henry V of England Leadership England
[1893] 1 Q.B. 256 1892 WL 9612 (CA)‚ [1893] 1 Q.B. 256 (Cite as: [1893] 1 Q.B. 256) Page 1 *256 Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. In the Court of Appeal. CA Lindley‚ Bowen and A. L. Smith‚ L.JJ. 1892 Dec. 6‚ 7. Contract--Offer by Advertisement--Performance of Condition in Advertisement-- Notification of Acceptance of Offer--Wager--Insurance--8 & 9 Vict. c. 109-- 14 Geo. 3‚ c. 48‚ s. 2. The defendants‚ the proprietors of a medical preparation called "The Carbolic Smoke Ball‚" issued an
Premium Contract Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company Invitation to treat
Introduction The case of Brown v. Board of education started when Linda Brown was forced to walk a mile to school although there was an all white school only seven blocks from her house. Mr. Oliver Brown went to the NAACP for help in presenting the case to the county‚ state‚ and if needed the federal governments. It was presented then to the state‚ but because of the Plessy v. Ferguson case‚ the state thought to have no jurisdiction over such an affair. Later that year it was presented to the Supreme
Premium United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Napoleon Hill once said‚ “Strength and growth come only through continuous effort and struggle.” This quote relates to Shin’s growth as an individual who is trying to escape Camp 14 and North Korea’s growth as a country. In the book‚ Escape from Camp 14‚ Shin is struggling to get out of Camp 14 so‚ he can experience the outside world while North Korea is struggling to hold together‚ but ends up growing from the struggle. In conclusion‚ Shin‚ and North Korea are similar in many ways through their
Premium North Korea South Korea Korean War