to spend an additional RM227m on acquiring additional land for the Free Zone development. This paper starts with the definition of corporate governance and discussion about the Port Klang Free Zone scandal. The discussion included the review of Port Klang scandal‚ reasons and impact of the scandal to Malaysian. 2.0 Definition of Corporate Governance Corporate Governance refers to the way a corporation is governed. It is the technique by which companies are directed and managed. It means carrying
Premium Corporate governance Malaysia Governance
in the midst of the situation. People are often quick to judge others and label people who do not respond as “bad people.” However‚ there are other situations to consider. The Penn State University scandal‚ for example‚ hid the horrendous
Premium Social psychology Cognitive dissonance
the main issue at hand: The company has paid £8.6m in corporation tax in its 14 years of trading in the UK and nothing in the last three years‚ despite UK sales of nearly £400m in 2011. only paid £8.5m in corporation tax since it launched in Britain in 1998 despite sales of £3bn‚ starbucks has reported a taxable profit only once in its 15 years of operating in the UK‚ often posting losses‚but on the other hand it reported profitability and good perfomance to its investors. corporation tax in the
Premium Tax British Empire European Union
Martirosyan Case 1.1 Qt.1 Several parties were responsible for Enron crisis‚ including independent auditor‚ key executive officers‚ internal auditors‚ SEC and FASB. The hypocrisy‚ dishonorable actions and unethical behavior of Kenney Lay‚ Jeffrey Skilling‚ Andrew Fastow led to bankruptcy. This and many other problems‚ such as loss in transactions involving the swaps stocks‚ SPE related issues and est.‚ finally contributed to crisis. As Enron executives‚ all of their concerns should have been focused
Premium Auditing Audit Enron
Ramalinga Raju The man behind the rise and fall of SATYAM’s success Presented By: 11/18/2014 Students of MSc. Financial and Managerial Accounting • Sonia Saher • Mohammad Waqas • Lu Tran Diem Trinh • Xin Wang 2 Roadmap: Introduction to Satyam and agency conflict overview Stakeholders at Satyam (presenter M. Waqas) Inadequacy in Satyam’s Corporate Governance (Presenter Trinh) Suggestions to save Satyam ship (Presenter Xin) Questions will be entertained at the end 11/18/2014
Premium Tax Income tax Audit
Management Scandal in 1998. They reported 1.7 billion in fake earnings by increasing the length of depreciation time for property‚ plant and equipment on the balance Page 2 sheets. The fraud was detected when a new CEO was brought in and the new management team went through the books. Motivation seems to be that this publicly traded company needed to keep stock prices up to keep investors and shareholders happy. Incentive‚ opportunity and rationalization are all at play here. The Enron Scandal in 2001
Premium Enron
Shaffer Directed by Marc Shaffer Correspondent Hedrick Smith ANNOUNCER: It was a meteoric rise. VOICE: We will become the world’s leading company. ANNOUNCER: And a devastating collapse. VOICE: Enron is a corporate Chernobyl. VOICE: You had the entire system playing fast and loose. VOICE: It is not just Enron‚ it’s an industry problem. LYNN TURNER‚ SEC Chief Accountant (1998-2001): It is real‚ real damage to the country. ANNOUNCER: Why didn’t anyone sound an alarm? VOICE: The watchdogs work for executives
Premium Enron scandal Enron Arthur Andersen
Business and Society Review 110:1 59– 76 Applying the Agency and Stakeholder Theories to the Enron Debacle: An Ethical Perspective Blackwell Oxford‚ Business BASR © 0045-3609 O 1 110 BUSINESS CULPAN riginal 2004 Center UK Article and and Publishing‚ and TRUSSEL Society for SOCIETY Business Ltd. Review REVIEW Ethics at Bentley College REFIK CULPAN AND JOHN TRUSSEL INTRODUCTION W e examine the infamous Enron debacle from an ethical perspective by defining its theoretical underpinnings and analyzing
Premium Enron Enron scandal
1913‚ Arthur Andersen LLP was found in Chicago‚ developed to become one of the “big five” largest accounting firm in the US. In 2003‚ after 90 years of business‚ the Chicago-based accounting firm was forced to close its doors because of accounting scandal I. The advent of consulting In the 1950s‚ Andersen began providing consulting services and over the next 30 years‚ Andersen’s consulting business became more profitable. With quick development of consulting sector‚ in 1999‚ Andersen separated
Premium Enron Audit Arthur Andersen
Enron- Examining a Business Failure University of Phoenix Organization Leadership LDR/531 Mr. January 12‚ 2010 Enron- Examining a Business Failure How did a multibillion dollar company arrive to the point of non existence? Was it the lack of organizational structure? Or maybe the lack of ethical management and leadership? One thing is certain and that is Enron has given the world a glance at how a leader within the energy industry‚ could have it all one minute‚ yet in a blink of
Premium Business ethics Management Ethics