To Kill A Mocking Bird By Harper Lee In the novel‚ To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee‚ a well respected lawyer named Atticus Finch agrees to defend a black man named Tom Robinson who has been accused of raping a white woman. Despite being scolded by the racist Maycomb community Atticus defends Mr. Robinson because he believes in justice and strives to prove the innocence of a black man unjustly accused of this crime. This novel depicts what it was like to live in a racist white community in the
Premium Black people Race African American
between free and slave states. Slavery was also a big issue between the Democrats in the 1860 election because they could not agree on the issue of popular sovereignty. This eventually led to their splitting which opened up the doors for Lincoln to take office. After Lincoln was inaugurated in 1860 seven states ceded and later four more. The south believed they were within their constitutional right to cede. In South Carolina’s Declaration of Causes for Session the state says‚ "Powers not delegated
Free American Civil War Reconstruction era of the United States Slavery in the United States
the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case of 1857‚ popularly known as the "Dred Scott Decision." The case was based on the fact that although he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves‚ they had lived with his slave owner‚ Dr. John Emerson‚ in states and territories where slavery was illegal according to both state laws and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787‚ including Illinois and Minnesota. The United States
Premium Slavery in the United States American Civil War Dred Scott v. Sandford
privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution‚ we have good reason for thinking that it is a fundamental human right. To defend my position‚ I will examine the term “privacy” in a philosophical and legal context‚ secondly I will explain why Supreme Court rulings over the years have established that privacy is a basic human right‚ and finally I will explain reasonable limits on this right. WHAT IS PRIVACY? In the dictionary‚ the term “privacy” is defined as “the state or condition of being free from
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Law
these rules balance out each other. Exclusionary rule is a judicially created rule that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal prosecution (Sheb and Sheb 503). It became known in 1914 after a Supreme Court case Weeks vs United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the rule was rational because police cannot illegaly do searches and
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Police
preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail‚ Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost‚ Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers
Premium Gideon v. Wainwright United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a class action suit brought by non-English speaking Chinese students against officials responsible for the operation of the San Francisco Unified School District. Certiorari[1] is an extraordinary judicial review in which the U.S. Supreme Court review cases of public importance. The primary issue of the case was whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment [to the U.S. Constitution‚ July 9‚ 1868[2]] apply
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
547 U.S. 319 (2006) I. Facts: In 1995‚ a South Carolina jury convicted and sentenced to death‚ petitioner‚ Bobby Lee Holmes‚ for the “murder‚ first-degree criminal sexual assault‚ first-degree burglary‚ and robbery‚” of 86-year-old Mary Stewart. State v. Holmes‚ 320 S.C. 259‚ 262‚ 464 S.E. 2d 334‚ 336 (1995). The defendant sought to present evidence that another party committed the crimes for which he stood trial. Id. Holmes’ defense cited information from witnesses that the other party‚ Jimmy McCaw
Free Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
involving the Fourteenth Amendment have come to the forefront of United States news. Adopted on July 9‚ 1868‚ the Fourteenth Amendment was primarily aimed at providing equal protection and protecting citizenship rights of former slaves and white Americans alike. In today’s society‚ the importance of the this far-reaching Amendment is becoming remarkably manifest. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from denying any person within the United States the equal protection
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
search and seizure conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment should be admissible in a state court? Rules: All evidence discovered as a result of a search and seizure conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in court. Analysis: Justice Clark filed the majority opinion saying: That the exclusionary rule applies to all evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s search and seizure clause in all state prosecutions. Since the Fourth Amendment’s right of privacy
Premium United States Constitution Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States