1. Out of the 12 jurors‚ juror number 10‚4‚ and 3 displayed some form of prejudice. Juror number 10 was the man that displayed his prejudice openly stating that “they” shouldn’t be trusted. He already had a view of the Turks from the time he "lived among them”. Another Juror that displayed prejudice is juror number 4. Juror number 4 was the stock broker. His prejudice was displayed when the group briefly talked about the slums and the people that come out of them. During this discussion he shows
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
TWELVE ANGRY MEN – QUOTES P1. ‘It now becomes your duty to separate the facts from the fancy’. (Judge) ‘I urge you to deliberate honestly and thoughtfully’. (Judge) ‘If‚ however‚ there is no reasonable doubt –then you must‚ in good conscience‚ find the accused guilty’. (Judge) ‘Your verdict must be unanimous’. (Judge) P3. ‘..Even when the case is as obvious as this one. I mean‚ did you ever hear so much talk about nothing?’ (Juror 3) ‘Everybody deserves a fair trial. Sometimes I think we’d
Premium Jury Law Not proven
Henry’s realized that some group members were going along with the group by voting guilty‚ similar to Asch’s Study. He realized some reluctance from juror number 2 “bank Teller”‚ 5 “man from slums”‚ 6 “painter”‚ 11 “watch maker” and 9 “old man”. Henry was the only juror voted as not guilty. His goal was to bring the group back to common sense‚ interact and brainstorm the case instead of jumping into conclusions. Henry made comments about values‚ fairness and righteousness. Then reminded the group that the final verdict has to
Premium Jury Grand jury Critical thinking
evidence to make what he thought was a logical decision. As the evening went on‚ I feel that his appeal was changed to ethos because of the juror that felt that he was innocent. He was impressed by this man because he was able to stand in front of the group and stick with his guilty verdict and not be swayed at all. The “old man” stood
Premium Jury Verdict Rhetoric
Peters Lutheran College‚ 66 Harts Road‚ Indooroopilly‚ Qld‚ 4068 COURT NAME: The Supreme Court of New York State TRIAL: Murder Case of Puerto Rican Youth DATE AND DURATION OF SERVICE: 9 July 1957‚ Duration of 4 hours DATE OF COMPOSITION: 12 August 1957 The jury system either the majority or unanimous system is a part of our Justice system. Recently‚ when present at a trial of young Puerto Rican youth accused of murder‚ it appeared that the unanimous jury was stronger and favourable
Free Jury
Its purpose was to emphasize the heated discussions going on inside the room and to increase the tension and pressure. Also‚ these men were driven to madness rapidly by the heat. The heat was one of the key elements the director used. It showed how strong the tension was in there and how hard it was for juror number eight having to persuade the other jurors‚ even when they only wanted
Premium Jury Not proven Academy Award for Best Actor
This week’s group presentation was about the jury selection. In many states they add the list of driver’s license and telephone directories to the juror pool which is how jurors get summons with a specific date and time. Other states add government list such as tax rolls and people who receive unemployment or food stamps however it is all random selection. Everyone has the right to trial and jurors are essential to this process. In order for a juror to get selected they must be citizens that are
Premium United States Crime Law
Martin Balsam (The Foreman) (Juror 1) Age: Late 30’s Early 40’s Job: Assistant Coach Very simple well organized man‚ kept things in line. Didn’t have much to say throughout the meeting. He enjoys coaching football seems to be the only time he is at ease is when he was talking about football. He was not faced with much conflict directed at him‚ but he seemed to keep the peace and didn’t want any problems. 5.5 He’s in a way quiet‚ he doesn’t have any resentment or say hurtful things to others
Premium Management Employment Organization
1 of 12 Original Research Group-as-a-whole as a context for studying individual behaviour: A group diagnostic intervention Author: Dirk J. Geldenhuys1 Affiliation: 1 Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology‚ University of South Africa‚ South Africa Orientation: Traditionalists view group interventions from three perspectives: singletons‚ dyads and whole groups. The focus of this research was on interventions from the third perspective‚ that of the whole group‚ using
Premium Research Psychology Group dynamics
because of their own personal reasons and prejudice feelings towards the case.One reason why a person should be innocent until proven guilty is because not all witnesses testify the truth or are not completely accurate.As seen in the film”Twelve Anger Men”.The testimony of the old man that lives in the same apartment building with the boy that’s on trail seems to be believable.The old man testified that he heard what
Premium Crime Jury Black people