Preview

12 Angry Men Jury Selection

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men Jury Selection
This week’s group presentation was about the jury selection. In many states they add the list of driver’s license and telephone directories to the juror pool which is how jurors get summons with a specific date and time. Other states add government list such as tax rolls and people who receive unemployment or food stamps however it is all random selection. Everyone has the right to trial and jurors are essential to this process. In order for a juror to get selected they must be citizens that are register to vote, are over the age of 18, they have to be mentally competent, speak English, and never convicted of any crimes. When selecting a jury this process is very long due to no-shows or people who responded they couldn’t make it. “Unfortunately,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay
    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay

    Juror 8 simply puts out questions and asks people to challenge their own beliefs. He is prepared to allow anyone to keep their own opinion without compromising his own.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    CJA 344 Week 3 Team Assignment Jury Nullification Paper
    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CJA 344 Week 3 Team Assignment Jury Nullification Paper

    Include contemporary examples ( within the last 10 years ) of ethnicity-based jury nullification. Note: you can use news articles ]…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecutor Forbes Court Case Study
    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prosecutor Forbes Court Case Study

    Prosecutors are not supposed to select certain gender, race or age for the jury selection. The important for the plaintiff and the defendant is to have jurors who are not in favor of any involved parties. In cases were a lawsuit involves significant amount of money, the voir dire has become extra complicated over time, so now attorneys use skilled jury selection services to help them pick analytical data to select the perfect jurors. Attorneys think with the option of selecting professional jurors can help their clients win cases. Critics complain, this special jury selection services provide an unfair help to the other party, who cannot afford the cost of the…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Character Development In Juror's Twelve Angry Men
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Character Development In Juror's Twelve Angry Men

    Twelve Angry Men is a very successful literary work even without everything that makes a good play. There are 12 main characters whose names are never said, stuck in a single room discussing the life of a man the reader knows nothing about. There is still a large amount of character development, which allows us to learn a lot about the jurors. Even though the trial is not in the play, the reader is able to figure out all the key points from it. While the entire play takes place in one room, the author is able to transform that room and allow all the necessary actions for the play to occur.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Benforado's Un Fair 'What We Must Overcome'
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Benforado's Un Fair 'What We Must Overcome'

    In chapter 11 of Unfair “What We Must Overcome” our author tackles on three serious challenges we face in realizing science-based reforms. First, he addresses the approach our justice system has towards juror screenings and exactly how we are getting it wrong. Benforado suggest that these juror screening are intended to eliminate those people who cannot be fair if selected to be a jury in a criminal case. While we purpose to address this bias, our author suggest that we are instead,” reinforcing a false narrative oh what bias is, where it comes from and how it can be remedied. “(P.g. 240) Consequently, Benforado offers us an experience of his own with the juror selection process, which he and other jurors filled out a questionnaire. Moreover, if you indicated that you are more likely to the believe the testimony of a police officer, over the testimony of a normal person all you received was speech on why it was wrong. The judge would explain to you that” your job as a juror required you to treat every witness the same regardless of his or her position, race, gender or the like. (P.g.240) After…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal
    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PSY328 final proposal

    Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty
    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    Everyone dreads Jury duty. Jury duty is commonly known as a nuisance that gets in the way of our everyday lives. When one types in the words “jury duty” into the google search bar that individual finds the first few search results to be “get out of jury duty” or “jury duty excuses”. However, we fail to realize that the role of a juror is essential to the United States justice system, we also fail to realize that every single juror counts. We often hear of jurors conforming, and switching their votes to the majority vote in hopes of going home, but this is not the case in “12 Angry Men”. In Sidney Lumet’s feature film “12 Angry Men”, we are given insight to the pressures of social psychology and how one man strives to overcome and change it.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice In 12 Angry Men
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice In 12 Angry Men

    It’s the hottest day of the year in New York City, and 12 clammy men, who were put on a jury, are locked into a room, where the fan doesn’t work and the windows stick, to discuss the case of an 18 year old accused of murder. In the opening scene, the judge states that is it a first degree murder and if found guilty the teenager will receive the death penalty. The 18 year old is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade. The 12 jurors must decide if there is enough evidence to convict the teen of murder. When the initial vote is taken it is 11-1. The one vote for not guilty is juror eight, whose real name is Davis. He is a well-spoken man, wore a suit and tie and had his dark hair slicked back for the trial. Davis admits that he doesn’t know if the teen is innocent but says he could be. In the movie 12 Angry Men, Juror eight shows true justice…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 men in the jury
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12 men in the jury

    I would have to say that it depends on the eye witness. A human being has been proven to sometimes see things that are not actually there and believe things that never happened. The emotions that we have make us susceptible to having our perceptions skewed and out senses tricked. There's also the issue of someone lying for personal gain. That being said, I wouldn't say that eye witness testimony isn't reliable, but it can't be seen as infallible and should be able to hold up to a certain amount of scrutiny.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Importance of a Jury in our Democratic System.
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Importance of a Jury in our Democratic System.

    Part of what makes a jury so fair is that not just anyone may be selected for jury duty. However, these limitations do not include pertain to race, gender, or social status, they in fact remain as anonymous as they could possibly be with numbers replacing names, and contact to outside sources limited for the sake of conducting an unbiased jury trial. Attorneys are extremely critical when deciding who will partake in a jury. Those chosen must not have any outside contact or any knowledge whatsoever of any person involved in the trial or there is the possibility of a biased vote. As much as possible, lawyers try to choose a well-rounded jury that consists of people from many different fields of work and backgrounds so as to have as many different perspectives as possible. For instance, if a psychologist were on a jury, they could offer a very in-depth perception of those on trial. Also those with a lot of different personal life experiences can usually compare those experiences and use them to benefit their decision…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men

    The American jury system, wherein citizens are judged by their peers, is one of the most democratic in the world. Nonetheless our system is far from perfect. There are many dangers in a system in which humans are asked to make decisions that could mean life or death for another person. Bias ranks amongst these dangers for it can affect the way jurors interpret testimonies and facts. Indifference is another factor; it too, can heavily affect a juror’s thinking. Personal feelings and experiences can stand in between a juror and the attainment of truth. The American jury system is intrinsically flawed in that it relies on intrinsically flawed humans to make life or death decisions…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Poop
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Poop

    The lifetime exclusion of felons from jury service is the majority rule in the U.S., used in thirty one states and in federal courts. The result is that over 6% of the adult population is excluded, including about 30% of black men,[2] creating a class of citizens defined and punished by the criminal justice system but unable to impact its function. Felon jury exclusion is less visible than felony disenfranchisement, and few socio-legal scholars have challenged the statutes that withhold a convicted felon’s opportunity to sit on a jury.[3] While constitutional challenges to felon jury exclusion almost always originate from interested litigants, some scholars contend that "it is the interests of the excluded felons that are most directly implicated." Yet, attacks on these blanket prohibitions levied by excluded felon jurors have failed consistently. The United States Supreme Court does not recognize the right to sit on a jury as fundamental.[4] It has been pointed out that, although lawmakers assert that felon jury exclusion measures protect the integrity of the adjudicative process, as felons “lack the requisite probity” to serve on a jury and are “inherently biased,” many of…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Nullification
    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jury Nullification

    A jury is most likely to acquit a defendant when members of the jury are sympathetic toward the defendant or disfavor the law under which the charges fall. Cases continue to exist, however, in which a juror's desire not to convict is for racial reasons. Some argue that after a long history of all White juries acquitting defendants who committed crimes against African Americans –and in a system in which African Americans have a higher likelihood of arrest and conviction –jury nullification can be a political tool in the face of a discriminatory process.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Duty
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Jury Duty

    My thoughts on my early morning experience during jury duty selection-I noticed a few elements of successful teaching. The judge was very explicit in explaining the judicial process for selecting a jury, and in explaining the process for a civil case. She presented, gave examples, and even checked for understanding throughout the process. It was funny how I started connecting her questioning of the potential jurors to be like TDQs in the way that each question was essential to some element of the case (were there any connections to the parties involved, the businesses, workers, was there a past experience like the case that could impact your thinking or decision…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics