Prosecutor Forbes Court Case Study

The court should appeal the incorrect actions taking by Prosecutor Forbes for removing the only two African-Americans from the jury stand. Prosecutor Forbes actions were a races act due to the fact, that all jurors should have the right to attend regardless of the race, nationality or gender. The only reason Forbes could remove the two African-Americans from the jury, is if both of the jurors were a close friend of the defendant Woodson. Then the prosecutor has the right to remove both jurors from the jury. If both of the African-Americans attend the jury stand, they can go in favor of Woodson and potentially the jurors will not have a unanimous decision for the final verdict. In the jury trail, the plaintiff and the defendant in the jury selection could reject one of the jurors without having a reason in addition, certain numbers of likely jurors who appear to have an unfavorable bias for the Woodson trial.
Prosecutors are not supposed to select certain gender, race or age for the jury selection. The important for the plaintiff and the defendant is to have jurors who are not in favor of any involved parties. In cases were a lawsuit involves significant amount of money, the voir dire has become extra complicated over time, so now attorneys use skilled jury selection services to help them pick analytical data to select the perfect jurors. Attorneys think with the option of selecting professional jurors can help their clients win cases. Critics complain, this special jury selection services provide an unfair help to the other party, who cannot afford the cost of the